• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用 K-均值聚类进行交叉验证评估美国安格斯肉牛基因组育种值的准确性。

Accuracies of genomic breeding values in American Angus beef cattle using K-means clustering for cross-validation.

机构信息

Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.

出版信息

Genet Sel Evol. 2011 Nov 28;43(1):40. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-43-40.

DOI:10.1186/1297-9686-43-40
PMID:22122853
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3250932/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Genomic selection is a recently developed technology that is beginning to revolutionize animal breeding. The objective of this study was to estimate marker effects to derive prediction equations for direct genomic values for 16 routinely recorded traits of American Angus beef cattle and quantify corresponding accuracies of prediction.

METHODS

Deregressed estimated breeding values were used as observations in a weighted analysis to derive direct genomic values for 3570 sires genotyped using the Illumina BovineSNP50 BeadChip. These bulls were clustered into five groups using K-means clustering on pedigree estimates of additive genetic relationships between animals, with the aim of increasing within-group and decreasing between-group relationships. All five combinations of four groups were used for model training, with cross-validation performed in the group not used in training. Bivariate animal models were used for each trait to estimate the genetic correlation between deregressed estimated breeding values and direct genomic values.

RESULTS

Accuracies of direct genomic values ranged from 0.22 to 0.69 for the studied traits, with an average of 0.44. Predictions were more accurate when animals within the validation group were more closely related to animals in the training set. When training and validation sets were formed by random allocation, the accuracies of direct genomic values ranged from 0.38 to 0.85, with an average of 0.65, reflecting the greater relationship between animals in training and validation. The accuracies of direct genomic values obtained from training on older animals and validating in younger animals were intermediate to the accuracies obtained from K-means clustering and random clustering for most traits. The genetic correlation between deregressed estimated breeding values and direct genomic values ranged from 0.15 to 0.80 for the traits studied.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that genomic estimates of genetic merit can be produced in beef cattle at a young age but the recurrent inclusion of genotyped sires in retraining analyses will be necessary to routinely produce for the industry the direct genomic values with the highest accuracy.

摘要

背景

基因组选择是一种新兴的技术,正在引发动物育种的革命。本研究的目的是估计标记效应,为美国安格斯肉牛的 16 个常规记录性状推导直接基因组值预测方程,并量化相应的预测准确性。

方法

使用去回归估计育种值作为观测值,在加权分析中为 3570 头使用 Illumina BovineSNP50 BeadChip 进行基因分型的公牛推导直接基因组值。这些公牛使用动物加性遗传关系的系谱估计值通过 K-均值聚类分为五组,目的是增加组内关系并减少组间关系。使用五组中任意四组的组合进行模型训练,在未用于训练的组中进行交叉验证。使用双变量动物模型为每个性状估计去回归估计育种值和直接基因组值之间的遗传相关性。

结果

所研究性状的直接基因组值的准确性范围为 0.22 至 0.69,平均为 0.44。当验证组中的动物与训练集中的动物更密切相关时,预测的准确性更高。当训练集和验证集通过随机分配形成时,直接基因组值的准确性范围为 0.38 至 0.85,平均为 0.65,反映了训练和验证动物之间的关系更大。从较年长的动物训练并在较年轻的动物中验证获得的直接基因组值的准确性介于 K-均值聚类和随机聚类获得的准确性之间。所研究性状的去回归估计育种值和直接基因组值之间的遗传相关性范围为 0.15 至 0.80。

结论

这些结果表明,可以在肉牛年轻时产生基因组估计的遗传优势,但为了定期为行业提供最高准确性的直接基因组值,需要将基因分型公牛反复纳入再训练分析中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba98/3250932/54be7120d273/1297-9686-43-40-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba98/3250932/352a292b6dbb/1297-9686-43-40-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba98/3250932/8a9381e368a9/1297-9686-43-40-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba98/3250932/938bb3d2ded6/1297-9686-43-40-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba98/3250932/a58bb7019161/1297-9686-43-40-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba98/3250932/54be7120d273/1297-9686-43-40-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba98/3250932/352a292b6dbb/1297-9686-43-40-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba98/3250932/8a9381e368a9/1297-9686-43-40-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba98/3250932/938bb3d2ded6/1297-9686-43-40-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba98/3250932/a58bb7019161/1297-9686-43-40-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba98/3250932/54be7120d273/1297-9686-43-40-5.jpg

相似文献

1
Accuracies of genomic breeding values in American Angus beef cattle using K-means clustering for cross-validation.利用 K-均值聚类进行交叉验证评估美国安格斯肉牛基因组育种值的准确性。
Genet Sel Evol. 2011 Nov 28;43(1):40. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-43-40.
2
Accuracies of direct genomic breeding values in Hereford beef cattle using national or international training populations.使用国家或国际训练群体评估海弗牛直接基因组育种值的准确性。
J Anim Sci. 2013 Apr;91(4):1538-51. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5593. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
3
Accuracy of direct genomic breeding values for nationally evaluated traits in US Limousin and Simmental beef cattle.美国利木赞牛和西门塔尔牛全国评估性状直接基因组育种值的准确性。
Genet Sel Evol. 2012 Dec 7;44(1):38. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-44-38.
4
Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.发展巴西安格斯牛的基因组预测,纳入相关美国父本的基因型。
J Anim Sci. 2022 Feb 1;100(2). doi: 10.1093/jas/skac009.
5
Genomic prediction using different estimation methodology, blending and cross-validation techniques for growth traits and visual scores in Hereford and Braford cattle.利用不同的估计方法、混合和交叉验证技术对赫里福德牛和布拉福德牛的生长性状和视觉评分进行基因组预测。
J Anim Sci. 2018 Jun 29;96(7):2579-2595. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky175.
6
Accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values from pure-breed and across-breed predictions in Australian beef cattle.澳大利亚肉牛纯品种和跨品种预测的基因组估计育种值的准确性。
Genet Sel Evol. 2014 Oct 24;46(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12711-014-0061-9.
7
The impact of clustering methods for cross-validation, choice of phenotypes, and genotyping strategies on the accuracy of genomic predictions.聚类方法对交叉验证、表型选择和基因分型策略对基因组预测准确性的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2019 Apr 3;97(4):1534-1549. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz055.
8
Genomic prediction for tick resistance in Braford and Hereford cattle.布拉福德牛和赫里福德牛蜱抗性的基因组预测
J Anim Sci. 2015 Jun;93(6):2693-705. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8832.
9
Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes.来源于去回归育种值和表型的多品种肉牛群体中基因组育种值的准确性。
J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90(12):4177-90. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4586. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
10
The impact of training strategies on the accuracy of genomic predictors in United States Red Angus cattle.训练策略对美国红安格斯牛基因组预测准确性的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2017 Aug;95(8):3406-3414. doi: 10.2527/jas.2017.1604.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of the linear regression method to evaluate population accuracy of predictions from non-linear models.使用线性回归方法评估非线性模型预测的总体准确性。
Front Genet. 2024 May 31;15:1380643. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1380643. eCollection 2024.
2
Enhancing Genomic Prediction Accuracy for Body Conformation Traits in Korean Holstein Cattle.提高韩国荷斯坦奶牛体型性状的基因组预测准确性
Animals (Basel). 2024 Mar 29;14(7):1052. doi: 10.3390/ani14071052.
3
Genetic parameters and genomic prediction of growth and breast morphological traits in a crossbreed duck population.

本文引用的文献

1
Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection.贝叶斯字母在基因组选择中的扩展。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 May 23;12:186. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-186.
2
The nature, scope and impact of genomic prediction in beef cattle in the United States.美国肉牛基因组预测的性质、范围和影响。
Genet Sel Evol. 2011 May 15;43(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-43-17.
3
Partial-genome evaluation of postweaning feed intake and efficiency of crossbred beef cattle.对杂交肉牛断奶后采食量和效率的部分基因组评估。
杂交鸭群体生长和胸部形态性状的遗传参数及基因组预测
Evol Appl. 2024 Feb 7;17(2):e13638. doi: 10.1111/eva.13638. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Strategies to improve genomic predictions for 35 duck carcass traits in an F population.在一个F群体中提高35种鸭胴体性状基因组预测的策略。
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2023 May 6;14(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s40104-023-00875-8.
5
Genomic Prediction Accuracies for Growth and Carcass Traits in a Brangus Heifer Population.婆罗门小母牛群体生长和胴体性状的基因组预测准确性
Animals (Basel). 2023 Apr 6;13(7):1272. doi: 10.3390/ani13071272.
6
Selective genotyping to implement genomic selection in beef cattle breeding.在肉牛育种中实施基因组选择的选择性基因分型。
Front Genet. 2023 Mar 17;14:1083106. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1083106. eCollection 2023.
7
Genomic heritability and correlation between carcass traits in Japanese Black cattle evaluated under different ceilings of relatedness among individuals.在不同个体亲缘关系上限下评估的日本黑牛胴体性状之间的基因组遗传力和相关性。
Front Genet. 2023 Feb 1;14:1053291. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1053291. eCollection 2023.
8
Estimation of Linkage Disequilibrium, Effective Population Size, and Genetic Parameters of Phenotypic Traits in Dabieshan Cattle.大别山牛连锁不平衡、有效群体大小和表型性状遗传参数的估计。
Genes (Basel). 2022 Dec 29;14(1):107. doi: 10.3390/genes14010107.
9
Genome-wide association and genotype by environment interactions for growth traits in U.S. Red Angus cattle.美国红安格斯牛生长性状的全基因组关联和基因型与环境互作分析。
BMC Genomics. 2022 Jul 16;23(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08667-6.
10
Genotyping and phenotyping strategies for genetic improvement of meat quality and carcass composition in swine.猪肌肉品质和胴体组成的遗传改良的基因分型和表型策略。
Genet Sel Evol. 2022 Jun 7;54(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12711-022-00736-4.
J Anim Sci. 2011 Jun;89(6):1731-41. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3526. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
4
Genome-wide association studies for feedlot and growth traits in cattle.牛的肥育和生长性状的全基因组关联研究。
J Anim Sci. 2011 Jun;89(6):1684-97. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3079. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
5
Genetic architecture of complex traits and accuracy of genomic prediction: coat colour, milk-fat percentage, and type in Holstein cattle as contrasting model traits.复杂性状的遗传结构和基因组预测的准确性:以荷斯坦牛的毛色、乳脂率和类型为例的对比模型性状。
PLoS Genet. 2010 Sep 23;6(9):e1001139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001139.
6
A genome scan for quantitative trait loci influencing carcass, post-natal growth and reproductive traits in commercial Angus cattle.对影响商业安格斯牛胴体、产后生长和繁殖性状的数量性状基因座进行全基因组扫描。
Anim Genet. 2010 Dec;41(6):597-607. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02063.x.
7
Impact of reduced marker set estimation of genomic relationship matrices on genomic selection for feed efficiency in Angus cattle.基因组关系矩阵标记集估计减少对安格斯牛饲料效率基因组选择的影响。
BMC Genet. 2010 Apr 19;11:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-11-24.
8
Preliminary investigation on reliability of genomic estimated breeding values in the Danish Holstein population.丹麦荷斯坦牛群体基因组估计育种值可靠性的初步研究。
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Mar;93(3):1175-83. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2192.
9
The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle.遗传关系信息对德国荷斯坦奶牛基因组育种值的影响。
Genet Sel Evol. 2010 Feb 19;42(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-42-5.
10
The pattern of linkage disequilibrium in German Holstein cattle.德国荷斯坦奶牛的连锁不平衡模式。
Anim Genet. 2010 Aug;41(4):346-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2009.02011.x. Epub 2010 Jan 3.