• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别 2 型糖尿病低收入患者适当饮食行为障碍。

Identification of barriers to appropriate dietary behavior in low-income patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Clinical and Administrative Sciences, University of Oklahoma College of Pharmacy, 1110 N Stonewall, Oklahoma City, OK, 73117-1200, USA,

出版信息

Diabetes Ther. 2011 Mar;2(1):9-19. doi: 10.1007/s13300-010-0012-6. Epub 2011 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1007/s13300-010-0012-6
PMID:22127765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3124642/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify barriers to appropriate dietary behavior in an urban, low-income population of patients with type 2 diabetes and to examine a new instrument in the identification of these barriers in this population.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was developed, validated, and anonymously administered to low-income adults with type 2 diabetes in an academic family medicine physician group practice with a pharmacist-operated diabetes education and comanagement service. The survey consisted of three key subscales: determinants of food selection, importance of life challenges, and barriers to appropriate eating.

RESULTS

The survey was administered to 98 patients with a mean age of 51.98 years, a mean duration of diabetes of 9.76 years, and a mean hemoglobin A1c of 7.99%. When asked to rate factors most important in food selection, the highest mean responses were taste (3.97 out of 5) and cost (score of 3.94 out of 5). Barriers that the majority of respondents agreed or strongly agreed were important included: stress causing over-eating or unhealthy food choices, difficulty resisting the temptation to eat unhealthy food, and healthy food being too expensive. The Cronbach's Alpha for the subscales of food selection, importance of life challenges, and barrier were 0.673, 0.853, and 0.786, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In a low-income, urban, predominantly African American and Caucasian diabetic population, cost of healthy food, stress-related inappropriate eating, and the temptation to eat unhealthy food were the most frequently reported barriers to healthy eating. Diabetes education programs serving similar populations should evaluate the presence of these barriers. The survey instrument was a reliable measure of the constructs it purported to measure.

摘要

目的

确定 2 型糖尿病城市低收入人群适当饮食行为的障碍,并在该人群中检验一种识别这些障碍的新工具。

方法

开发了一个横断面调查,对一家学术家庭医学医生集团实践中由药剂师运营的糖尿病教育和共同管理服务的 2 型糖尿病低收入成年人进行了验证和匿名管理。该调查包括三个关键子量表:食物选择的决定因素、生活挑战的重要性和适当饮食的障碍。

结果

该调查共向 98 名平均年龄为 51.98 岁、糖尿病平均病程为 9.76 年、血红蛋白 A1c 平均为 7.99%的患者进行了调查。当被要求对食物选择最重要的因素进行评分时,最高的平均评分为口味(5 分制得 3.97 分)和价格(5 分制得 3.94 分)。大多数受访者同意或强烈同意的重要障碍包括:压力导致过度进食或选择不健康的食物、难以抵制吃不健康食物的诱惑、以及健康食品太贵。食物选择、生活挑战和障碍的子量表的 Cronbach's Alpha 分别为 0.673、0.853 和 0.786。

结论

在一个低收入、城市、以非裔美国人和白人为主要人口的 2 型糖尿病人群中,健康食品的成本、与压力相关的不适当饮食以及吃不健康食品的诱惑是健康饮食的最大障碍。为类似人群提供的糖尿病教育计划应评估这些障碍的存在。该调查工具是对其声称要衡量的结构的可靠测量。

相似文献

1
Identification of barriers to appropriate dietary behavior in low-income patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.识别 2 型糖尿病低收入患者适当饮食行为障碍。
Diabetes Ther. 2011 Mar;2(1):9-19. doi: 10.1007/s13300-010-0012-6. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
2
Perceived facilitators and barriers to healthy dietary behaviour in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Kenya: A qualitative study.肯尼亚2型糖尿病成年人健康饮食行为的感知促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Oct 10;25(12):1-24. doi: 10.1017/S136898002200221X.
3
Assessing the determinants of unhealthy dietary habits among a sample of survey participants in Jamaica.评估牙买加调查参与者样本中不健康饮食习惯的决定因素。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2022 Aug 25;46:e72. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2022.72. eCollection 2022.
4
Demographic characteristics and food choices of participants in the Special Diabetes Program for American Indians Diabetes Prevention Demonstration Project.美国印第安人糖尿病预防示范项目特殊糖尿病计划参与者的人口统计学特征和食物选择
Ethn Health. 2015;20(4):327-40. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2014.921890. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
5
Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes-Related Distress in Patients With Insulin-Dependent Type 2 Diabetes: Cross-sectional, Mixed Methods Approach.胰岛素依赖型2型糖尿病患者健康的社会决定因素与糖尿病相关困扰:横断面混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Oct 12;6(10):e40164. doi: 10.2196/40164.
6
Perceived barriers to recommended dietary adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes in Iran.伊朗 2 型糖尿病患者遵医嘱饮食的障碍感知。
Eat Behav. 2016 Apr;21:205-10. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
7
Individual, social and environmental factors influencing dietary behaviour in shift workers with type 2 diabetes working in UK healthcare: A cross-sectional survey.影响英国医疗保健行业2型糖尿病轮班工作者饮食行为的个人、社会和环境因素:一项横断面调查。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2023 Oct;36(5):1992-2009. doi: 10.1111/jhn.13198. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
8
Diabetes in urban African Americans. V. Use of discussion groups to identify barriers to dietary therapy among low-income individuals with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.美国城市非裔美国人中的糖尿病。五、利用讨论小组确定低收入非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者饮食治疗的障碍。
Diabetes Educ. 1996 Sep-Oct;22(5):488-92. doi: 10.1177/014572179602200508.
9
Barriers to healthy food access: Associations with household income and cooking behavior.获取健康食品的障碍:与家庭收入及烹饪行为的关联
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Jan 31;13:298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.01.023. eCollection 2019 Mar.
10
The Dietary Choices of Women Who Are Low-Income, Pregnant, and African American.低收入、怀孕且为非裔美国人的女性的饮食选择
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016 Sep;61(5):606-612. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12463. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Effect of a Food Voucher on the Dietary Intake of Patients with Diabetes Using the Canadian Diet History Questionnaire III: A Randomized Control Trial.使用加拿大饮食史问卷III评估食品券对糖尿病患者饮食摄入量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Nutrients. 2025 Sep 4;17(17):2865. doi: 10.3390/nu17172865.
2
Association of the glycemic background patterns and the diabetes management efficacy in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.血糖背景模式与血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者糖尿病管理疗效的关联
World J Diabetes. 2025 Jan 15;16(1):98322. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i1.98322.
3
Cooking Well with Diabetes: A Healthy Cooking School for Diabetes Prevention and Management.《糖尿病的健康烹饪:预防和管理糖尿病的健康烹饪学校》
Nutrients. 2024 Aug 3;16(15):2543. doi: 10.3390/nu16152543.
4
Redesigning Recruitment and Engagement Strategies for Virtual Culinary Medicine and Medical Nutrition Interventions in a Randomized Trial of Patients with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes.重新设计招募和参与策略,以在一项针对未控制 2 型糖尿病患者的随机试验中进行虚拟烹饪医学和医学营养干预。
Nutrients. 2023 Sep 25;15(19):4124. doi: 10.3390/nu15194124.
5
Personal Goals, Barriers to Self-Management and Desired mHealth Application Features to Improve Self-Care in Multi-Ethnic Asian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study.多族群亚裔 2 型糖尿病患者的个人目标、自我管理障碍及改善自我护理所需的移动医疗应用功能特征:一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 21;19(22):15415. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215415.
6
A Pharmacist and Health Coach-Delivered Mobile Health Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Crossover Study.药剂师与健康教练提供的2型糖尿病移动健康干预:一项随机对照交叉研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Mar 10;10(3):e17170. doi: 10.2196/17170.
7
Identifying Barriers and Facilitators to Diet and Physical Activity Behaviour Change in Type 2 Diabetes Using a Design Probe Methodology.使用设计探针方法识别2型糖尿病患者饮食和身体活动行为改变的障碍与促进因素。
J Pers Med. 2021 Jan 26;11(2):72. doi: 10.3390/jpm11020072.
8
Mediating role diet self-efficacy plays in the relationship between social support and diet self-management for patients with type 2 diabetes.饮食自我效能在2型糖尿病患者社会支持与饮食自我管理关系中所起的中介作用。
Arch Public Health. 2021 Jan 31;79(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00533-3.
9
Type 2 Diabetes Patients' Perspectives, Experiences, and Barriers Toward Diabetes-Related Self-Care: A Qualitative Study From Pakistan.2 型糖尿病患者对糖尿病相关自我护理的看法、经验和障碍:来自巴基斯坦的定性研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Nov 27;11:534873. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.534873. eCollection 2020.
10
A Resilience Intervention for Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Proof-of-Concept in Community Health Centers.一项针对2型糖尿病成人患者的复原力干预措施:社区卫生中心的概念验证
Int J Behav Med. 2020 Oct;27(5):565-575. doi: 10.1007/s12529-020-09894-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010.《糖尿病医疗护理标准——2010》
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-61. doi: 10.2337/dc10-S011.
2
Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes.强化降糖对2型糖尿病的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2545-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802743. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
3
Cultural factors and patients' adherence to lifestyle measures.文化因素与患者对生活方式措施的依从性。
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Apr;57(537):291-5.
4
Association of socio-economic status with diabetes prevalence and utilization of diabetes care services.社会经济地位与糖尿病患病率及糖尿病护理服务利用情况的关联
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct 3;6:124. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-124.
5
Perceived barriers and effective strategies to diabetes self-management.糖尿病自我管理中感知到的障碍及有效策略。
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Apr;54(2):151-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03799.x.
6
Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins.降低胆固醇治疗的疗效与安全性:对他汀类药物14项随机试验中90,056名参与者数据的前瞻性荟萃分析
Lancet. 2005 Oct 8;366(9493):1267-78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67394-1. Epub 2005 Sep 27.
7
Family history, diabetes, and other demographic and risk factors among participants of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2002.1999 - 2002年美国国家健康与营养检查调查参与者的家族病史、糖尿病及其他人口统计学和风险因素。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2005 Apr;2(2):A19. Epub 2005 Mar 15.
8
Barriers to following dietary recommendations in Type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者遵循饮食建议的障碍。
Diabet Med. 2005 Jan;22(1):32-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01342.x.
9
Meta-analysis: glycosylated hemoglobin and cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus.荟萃分析:糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白与心血管疾病
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Sep 21;141(6):421-31. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-6-200409210-00007.
10
Food habits are related to glycemic control among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.饮食习惯与2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制有关。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2004 Apr;104(4):560-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2004.01.013.