Suppr超能文献

训练状态改善了抗阻运动中主观疲劳感知评分与相对运动容量之间的关系。

Training state improves the relationship between rating of perceived exertion and relative exercise volume during resistance exercises.

机构信息

Sport Sciences Faculty, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Nov;26(11):2990-6. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31824301d1.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate how the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) during resistance exercises was influenced by the exercise volume and athletes' training state. Eighty physical education students (well trained, less well trained, and novices) rated their perceived exertion of multilift sets using the category-ratio scale. These sets were performed with moderate (60-80% of 1-repetition maximum [1RM]) and heavy loads (80-100% of 1RM) involving low volume of exercise (5.5 ± 1.1 reps for moderate and 1.3 ± 0.4 reps for the heavy load) and high volume of exercise (moderate load: 17.5 ± 2.1 reps; high load: 2.9 ± 0.6 reps). The exercise volume of the sets was expressed relatively to individual maximal capacities using the maximum number of repetition (MNR) for the load lifted. General linear model describes that RPE was related to MNR % with a training state effect (p < 0.01) observed only for sets involving a low MNR % and without effect of absolute volume and exercise intensity (high MNR sets: adjusted R = 0.65 and 0.78 and low MNR sets adjusted R = 0.37 and 0.34 in low MNR tests). High standard errors of estimated relative volume appeared when using the RPE from low exercise volume sets (12.8 and 14.4% of actual relative volume). Coaches should consider the RPE resulting from high exercise-induced physical strain to estimate the actual relative volume and to estimate the individual MNR at a given load.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨在进行抗阻训练时,感觉用力程度(RPE)评分是如何受到运动负荷和运动员训练状态影响的。80 名体育专业学生(训练有素、训练水平一般和新手)使用等级比率量表对多组举重的感觉用力程度进行评分。这些练习采用中等负荷(60-80%的 1 次重复最大重量[1RM])和大负荷(80-100%的 1RM)进行,运动负荷较低(中等负荷组:5.5±1.1 次;大负荷组:1.3±0.4 次)和较高(中等负荷组:17.5±2.1 次;大负荷组:2.9±0.6 次)。通过用所举重量的最大重复次数(MNR)表示,将练习的运动负荷与个体的最大能力相联系。一般线性模型表明,RPE 与 MNR%相关,仅在低 MNR%的练习组中观察到训练状态的影响(p<0.01),且不受绝对运动负荷和运动强度的影响(高 MNR 组:调整 R = 0.65 和 0.78;低 MNR 组调整 R = 0.37 和 0.34)。在使用低运动负荷组的 RPE 时,估计相对运动负荷的标准误差较大(实际相对运动负荷的 12.8%和 14.4%)。教练员应考虑高运动引起的身体应激产生的 RPE 来估计实际的相对运动负荷,并估计在给定负荷下的个体 MNR。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验