Demanet Jelle, Liefooghe Baptist, Verbruggen Frederick
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University Ghent, Belgium.
Front Psychol. 2011 Nov 24;2:336. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00336. eCollection 2011.
The present study focused on the interplay between arousal, valence, and cognitive control. To this end, we investigated how arousal and valence associated with affective stimuli influenced cognitive flexibility when switching between tasks voluntarily. Three hypotheses were tested. First, a valence hypothesis that states that the positive valence of affective stimuli will facilitate both global and task-switching performance because of increased cognitive flexibility. Second, an arousal hypothesis that states that arousal, and not valence, will specifically impair task-switching performance by strengthening the previously executed task-set. Third, an attention hypothesis that states that both cognitive and emotional control ask for limited attentional resources, and predicts that arousal will impair both global and task-switching performance. The results showed that arousal affected task-switching but not global performance, possibly by phasic modulations of the noradrenergic system that reinforces the previously executed task. In addition, positive valence only affected global performance but not task-switching performance, possibly by phasic modulations of dopamine that stimulates the general ability to perform in a multitasking environment.
本研究聚焦于唤醒、效价和认知控制之间的相互作用。为此,我们调查了与情感刺激相关的唤醒和效价如何在自愿进行任务切换时影响认知灵活性。我们检验了三个假设。首先,效价假设,即情感刺激的正性效价将由于认知灵活性的提高而促进整体和任务切换表现。其次,唤醒假设,即唤醒而非效价将通过强化先前执行的任务集来特别损害任务切换表现。第三,注意假设,即认知和情绪控制都需要有限的注意资源,并预测唤醒将损害整体和任务切换表现。结果表明,唤醒影响任务切换但不影响整体表现,这可能是通过去甲肾上腺素能系统的相位调制来强化先前执行的任务。此外,正性效价仅影响整体表现而不影响任务切换表现,这可能是通过多巴胺的相位调制来刺激在多任务环境中执行的一般能力。