Suppr超能文献

结肠镜检查准备质量对腺瘤检出率的影响。

The effect of colonoscopy preparation quality on adenoma detection rates.

机构信息

Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):545-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.022. Epub 2011 Dec 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopy reduces the risk of colorectal cancer mortality by removing precancerous adenomas. The detection rate of subcentimeter (<10 mm) polyps is lower for procedures with inadequate preparation quality.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the adenoma detection rates of small (6-9 mm) and diminutive (≤ 5 mm) adenomas in patients with poor and fair quality preparations with those with adequate quality preparations.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study and multivariable, hierarchical model.

SETTING

Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

PATIENTS

This study involved 8800 colonoscopies performed from 2001 to 2010.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Preparation quality rating, polyp size, and polyp histology.

RESULTS

Preparation quality was rated as fair in 2809 (31.9%) and poor in 829 (9.4%) colonoscopies. In patients with poor compared with adequate quality, the detection rate was lower for diminutive adenomas (odds ratio [OR] 0.57; 95% CI, 0.47-0.70) but not for small adenomas (OR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.65-1.07). There were no differences in the detection rate of diminutive (OR 1.08; 95% CI, 0.94-1.24]) or small (OR 1.09; 95% CI, 0.94-1.27) adenomas in patients with fair compared with adequate quality preparation. Detection of advanced histology in patients with poor preparation quality was lower than in those with adequate quality (P = .027; 3.3% vs 5.0%), but there was no difference in those with fair compared with adequate quality (P = .893; 4.9% vs 5.0%).

LIMITATIONS

Single-center study; no standardization of preparation quality or size measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

A fair preparation quality rating does not decrease the detection rate for adenomas of any size or for advanced histology, suggesting that fair quality may be considered adequate and that follow-up intervals may not need to be shortened. Poor preparation quality decreases the detection rate of diminutive adenomas and advanced histology, suggesting substandard colonoscopy performance.

摘要

背景

结肠镜检查通过切除癌前腺瘤降低结直肠癌死亡率。对于准备质量不足的检查,亚厘米(<10mm)息肉的检出率较低。

目的

比较准备质量差和一般的患者中直径 6-9mm 小腺瘤和<5mm 微小腺瘤的腺瘤检出率与准备质量足够的患者相比。

设计

横断面研究和多变量、分层模型。

地点

罗德斯巴什退伍军人事务医疗中心。

患者

本研究纳入 2001 年至 2010 年进行的 8800 例结肠镜检查。

主要观察指标

准备质量评分、息肉大小和息肉组织学。

结果

829 例(9.4%)结肠镜检查被评为准备质量差,2809 例(31.9%)被评为准备质量一般。与准备质量足够的患者相比,准备质量差的患者微小腺瘤的检出率较低(比值比[OR]0.57;95%CI,0.47-0.70),但小腺瘤的检出率无差异(OR 0.84;95%CI,0.65-1.07)。准备质量一般的患者微小(OR 1.08;95%CI,0.94-1.24)或小(OR 1.09;95%CI,0.94-1.27)腺瘤的检出率与准备质量足够的患者无差异。准备质量差的患者高级别组织学的检出率低于准备质量足够的患者(P=0.027;3.3%比 5.0%),但准备质量一般的患者与准备质量足够的患者无差异(P=0.893;4.9%比 5.0%)。

局限性

单中心研究;准备质量或大小测量无标准化。

结论

准备质量一般不会降低任何大小腺瘤或高级别组织学的检出率,提示一般质量可能被认为是足够的,不需要缩短随访间隔。准备质量差会降低微小腺瘤和高级别组织学的检出率,提示结肠镜检查表现不佳。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验