Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298–0003, USA.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;53(6):668-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02494.x. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
A critical issue in devising effective interventions for the treatment of children's behavioral and emotional problems identifying genuine family environmental factors that place children at risk. In most twin and family studies, environmental factors are confounded with both direct genetic risk from parents and the indirect effect of genes influencing parents' ability to provide an optimal rearing environment. The present study was undertaken to determine whether parental psychopathology, specifically parental antisocial behavior (ASP), is a genuine environmental risk factor for juvenile conduct disturbance, depression and hyperactivity, or whether the association between parental ASP and children's behavioral and emotional problems can be explained as a secondary consequence of the intergenerational transmission of genetic factors.
An extended children of twins design comprised of data collected on 2,674 adult female and male twins, their spouses, and 2,454 of their children was used to test whether genetic and/or family environmental factors best accounted for the association between parental antisocial behavior and children's behavioral problems. An age-matched sample of 2,826 juvenile twin pairs from the Virginia Twin Study of Adolescent Behavioral Development was also included to examine developmental differences in gene expression by partitioning child-specific transmissible effects from those effects that persist into adulthood. The fit of alternative models was evaluated using the statistical program Mx.
We found distinct patterns of transmission between parental antisocial behavior and juvenile conduct, depression and hyperactivity. Genetic and family environmental factors accounted for the resemblance between parents' ASP and children's conduct disturbance. Family environmental factors alone explained the association between child depression and parental ASP, and the impact of parental ASP on hyperactivity was entirely genetic.
These findings underscore differences in the contribution of genetic and environmental factors on the patterns of association between parental antisocial behavior and juvenile psychopathology, having important clinical implications for the prevention and amelioration of child behavioral and emotional problems.
设计有效的干预措施来治疗儿童行为和情绪问题的一个关键问题是确定真正使儿童面临风险的家庭环境因素。在大多数双胞胎和家庭研究中,环境因素与父母的直接遗传风险以及基因影响父母提供最佳养育环境的能力的间接效应相混淆。本研究旨在确定父母的精神病理学,特别是父母的反社会行为(ASP),是否是青少年行为障碍、抑郁和多动的真正环境风险因素,或者父母的 ASP 与儿童的行为和情绪问题之间的关联是否可以解释为遗传因素代际传递的次生后果。
采用扩展的双胞胎子女设计,收集了 2674 对成年女性和男性双胞胎及其配偶及其 2454 名子女的数据,以测试遗传和/或家庭环境因素是否最能解释父母反社会行为与儿童行为问题之间的关联。还纳入了来自弗吉尼亚青少年行为发展双胞胎研究的 2826 对青少年双胞胎的年龄匹配样本,以通过从成年期持续存在的效应中划分儿童特异性可传递效应来检验基因表达的发展差异。使用统计程序 Mx 评估替代模型的拟合情况。
我们发现父母的反社会行为与青少年行为、抑郁和多动之间存在不同的传递模式。遗传和家庭环境因素解释了父母的 ASP 与儿童行为障碍之间的相似性。家庭环境因素单独解释了儿童抑郁与父母 ASP 之间的关联,而父母 ASP 对多动的影响完全是遗传的。
这些发现强调了遗传和环境因素对父母反社会行为与青少年精神病理学之间关联模式的贡献差异,对预防和改善儿童行为和情绪问题具有重要的临床意义。