Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Apr;57(4):1069-71. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1982-6. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
A needle knife is often used to gain bile duct access when standard techniques have failed. If unsuccessful, the next step may involve either radiological- or endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary access. However, repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) may be an option if the patient's clinical condition permits.
To determine the success of repeat ERCP after failed use of a needle knife to gain biliary access.
Retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent initial unsuccessful biliary cannulation after use of a needle knife between 2007 and 2010.
Seventy five patients were identified. Of these, 51 (68%) underwent repeat ERCP, and biliary cannulation was successful in 38 (75%). The median time to repeat ERCP was 7.7 days (range 1-28 days). Complications developed in two (4%) patients. These included one case each of wire-guided perforation and mild pancreatitis, both of which were resolved by conservative management.
Repeat ERCP within a few days after failed use of a needle knife for biliary access is associated with acceptable success and acceptable incidence of complications, and therefore obviates the need for alternative approaches for biliary access for most patients.
当标准技术失败时,通常使用针刀来获得胆管通路。如果不成功,下一步可能涉及放射学或内镜超声引导的胆道进入。然而,如果患者的临床状况允许,重复内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)可能是一种选择。
确定在使用针刀获得胆道通路失败后重复 ERCP 的成功率。
回顾性分析 2007 年至 2010 年间所有使用针刀进行初始胆道插管失败的患者。
共确定了 75 例患者。其中 51 例(68%)接受了重复 ERCP,38 例(75%)胆道插管成功。重复 ERCP 的中位时间为 7.7 天(范围 1-28 天)。两名(4%)患者发生并发症。包括一例导丝引导穿孔和一例轻度胰腺炎,均通过保守治疗解决。
在使用针刀进行胆道插管失败后几天内进行重复 ERCP,成功率可接受,并发症发生率可接受,因此大多数患者无需采用替代方法获得胆道通路。