Kaartinen Ilkka S, Kuokkanen Hannu O
Department of Plastic Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2011 Sep;45(4-5):200-3. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2011.583515.
Split-thickness skin grafts are routine in the treatment of deep dermal burns and various other wounds. Healing of the donor site of the graft has an impact on the total recovery of the patient. We conducted a prospective clinical study at Tampere University Hospital to compare the effect of two adhesive wound dressings, Suprathel(®) and Mepilex(®) Transfer. The donor sites of 22 split-thickness skin grafts were studied, each of which was covered with Suprathel(®) and Mepilex(®) Transfer dressings side by side. Significantly less pain and bleeding was associated with Suprathel(®) treatment compared with Mepilex(®) Transfer (p < 0.05). Suprathel(®) produced a better scar at the three months' follow-up as measured using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). The results show that Suprathel(®) is a better dressing for the donor sites than Mepilex(®) Transfer.
断层皮片移植是治疗深度真皮烧伤和各种其他伤口的常规方法。移植供皮区的愈合对患者的整体恢复有影响。我们在坦佩雷大学医院进行了一项前瞻性临床研究，以比较两种粘性伤口敷料Suprathel(®)和Mepilex(®) Transfer的效果。研究了22例断层皮片移植的供皮区，每个供皮区并排覆盖Suprathel(®)和Mepilex(®) Transfer敷料。与Mepilex(®) Transfer相比，Suprathel(®)治疗的疼痛和出血明显更少（p < 0.05）。使用温哥华瘢痕量表（VSS）测量，在三个月的随访中，Suprathel(®)产生的瘢痕更好。结果表明，对于供皮区，Suprathel(®)是比Mepilex(®) Transfer更好的敷料。
