Raza Ali S, Cho Jungsuk, de Moraes Carlos G V, Wang Min, Zhang Xian, Kardon Randy H, Liebmann Jeffrey M, Ritch Robert, Hood Donald C
Department of Psychology, Columbia University, 1190 Amsterdam Ave, 405 Schermerhorn Hall, Room 301, New York, NY 10027-7004, USA.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Dec;129(12):1529-36. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.352.
To compare loss in sensitivity measured using standard automated perimetry (SAP) with local retinal ganglion cell layer (RGC) thickness measured using frequency-domain optical coherence tomography in the macula of patients with glaucoma.
To compare corresponding locations of RGC thickness with total deviation (TD) of 10-2 SAP for 14 patients with glaucoma and 19 controls, an experienced operator hand-corrected automatic segmentation of the combined RGC and inner plexiform layer (RGC+IPL) of 128 horizontal B-scans. To account for displacement of the RGC bodies around the fovea, the location of the SAP test points was adjusted to correspond to the location of the RGC bodies rather than to the photoreceptors, based on published histological findings. For analysis, RGC+IPL thickness vs SAP (TD) data were grouped into 5 eccentricities, from 3.4° to 9.7° radius on the retina with respect to the fovea.
The RGC+IPL thickness correlated well with SAP loss within approximately 7.2° of the fovea (Spearman ρ = 0.71-0.74). Agreement was worse (0.53-0.65) beyond 7.2°, where the normal RGC layer is relatively thin. A linear model relating RGC+IPL thickness to linear SAP loss provided a reasonable fit for eccentricities within 7.2°.
In the central 7.2°, local RGC+IPL thickness correlated well with local sensitivity loss in glaucoma when the data were adjusted for RGC displacement.
比较使用标准自动视野计(SAP)测量的敏感度损失与使用频域光学相干断层扫描测量的青光眼患者黄斑区局部视网膜神经节细胞层(RGC)厚度。
为比较14例青光眼患者和19例对照者的RGC厚度对应位置与10-2 SAP的总偏差(TD),一位经验丰富的操作人员对128次水平B扫描的RGC和内网状层(RGC+IPL)组合进行手动校正自动分割。根据已发表的组织学研究结果,为了考虑RGC细胞体在中央凹周围的位移,将SAP测试点的位置调整为与RGC细胞体的位置相对应,而不是与光感受器的位置相对应。为进行分析,将RGC+IPL厚度与SAP(TD)数据按5个偏心度分组,相对于中央凹,视网膜半径范围为3.4°至9.7°。
在中央凹约7.2°范围内,RGC+IPL厚度与SAP敏感度损失相关性良好(Spearman ρ=0.71-0.74)。在7.2°以外,一致性较差(0.53-0.65),此时正常RGC层相对较薄。将RGC+IPL厚度与线性SAP敏感度损失相关的线性模型对7.2°以内的偏心度提供了合理的拟合。
在中央7.2°范围内,当对RGC位移进行数据调整时,青光眼患者局部RGC+IPL厚度与局部敏感度损失相关性良好。