Faculty of Physical Education and Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Aug;112(8):2785-815. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2268-6. Epub 2011 Dec 11.
Over the years, techniques for the study of human movement have ranged in complexity and precision from direct observation of the subject through activity diaries, questionnaires, and recordings of body movement, to the measurement of physiological responses, studies of metabolism and indirect and direct calorimetry. This article reviews developments in each of these domains. Particular reference is made to their impact upon the continuing search for valid field estimates of activity patterns and energy expenditures, as required by the applied physiologist, ergonomist, sports scientist, nutritionist and epidemiologist. Early observers sought to improve productivity in demanding employment. Direct observation and filming of workers were supplemented by monitoring of heart rates, ventilation and oxygen consumption. Such methods still find application in ergonomics and sport, but many investigators are now interested in relationships between habitual physical activity and chronic disease. Even sophisticated questionnaires still do not provide valid information on the absolute energy expenditures associated with good health. Emphasis has thus shifted to use of sophisticated pedometer/accelerometers, sometimes combining their output with GPS and other data. Some modern pedometer/accelerometers perform well in the laboratory, but show substantial systematic errors relative to laboratory reference criteria such as the metabolism of doubly labeled water when assessing the varied activities of daily life. The challenge remains to develop activity monitors that are sufficiently inexpensive for field use, yet meet required accuracy standards. Possibly, measurements of oxygen consumption by portable respirometers may soon satisfy part of this need, although a need for valid longer term monitoring will remain.
多年来,研究人体运动的技术在复杂性和精确性方面从通过活动日记、问卷和身体运动记录对受试者的直接观察,到测量生理反应、代谢研究以及间接和直接量热法,都有所发展。本文综述了这些领域的每一个领域的发展。特别提到了它们对应用生理学家、人类工效学家、运动科学家、营养学家和流行病学家继续寻找活动模式和能量消耗的有效现场估计的影响。早期的观察者试图提高高要求工作中的生产力。对工人的直接观察和拍摄辅以心率、通气和耗氧量监测。这些方法在人类工效学和运动中仍有应用,但许多研究人员现在对习惯性体力活动与慢性疾病之间的关系感兴趣。即使是复杂的问卷也不能提供与健康相关的绝对能量消耗的有效信息。因此,重点已转移到使用复杂的计步器/加速度计,有时将其输出与 GPS 和其他数据结合使用。一些现代计步器/加速度计在实验室中表现良好,但在评估日常生活中的各种活动时,相对于实验室参考标准(如双标记水的代谢),它们显示出较大的系统误差。挑战仍然是开发足够便宜的现场使用的活动监测器,但要满足所需的精度标准。便携式呼吸计测量耗氧量可能很快就能满足部分需求,尽管仍需要进行有效的长期监测。