• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解老年人群体对酒精需求的价格弹性异质性。

Understanding heterogeneity in price elasticities in the demand for alcohol for older individuals.

机构信息

University of Iowa, Health Management and Policy, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2013 Jan;22(1):89-105. doi: 10.1002/hec.1817. Epub 2011 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1002/hec.1817
PMID:22162113
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3641566/
Abstract

This paper estimates the price elasticity of demand for alcohol using Health and Retirement Study data. To account for unobserved heterogeneity in price responsiveness, we use finite mixture models. We recover two latent groups, one is significantly responsive to price, but the other is unresponsive. The group with greater responsiveness is disadvantaged in multiple domains, including health, financial resources, education and perhaps even planning abilities. These results have policy implications. The unresponsive group drinks more heavily, suggesting that a higher tax would fail to curb the negative alcohol-related externalities. In contrast, the more disadvantaged group is more responsive to price, thus suffering greater deadweight loss, yet this group consumes fewer drinks per day and might be less likely to impose negative externalities.

摘要

本文使用健康与退休研究数据估计了酒精的需求价格弹性。为了考虑到价格反应的未观测异质性,我们使用有限混合模型。我们发现了两个潜在的群体,一个对价格的反应明显,而另一个则没有反应。反应更强烈的群体在多个领域处于不利地位,包括健康、财务资源、教育,甚至可能还有规划能力。这些结果具有政策意义。无反应群体饮酒量更大,这表明提高税收并不能遏制负面的与酒精相关的外部性。相比之下,处于更不利地位的群体对价格的反应更敏感,因此遭受更大的无谓损失,但这个群体每天的饮酒量更少,可能不太会产生负面的外部性。

相似文献

1
Understanding heterogeneity in price elasticities in the demand for alcohol for older individuals.理解老年人群体对酒精需求的价格弹性异质性。
Health Econ. 2013 Jan;22(1):89-105. doi: 10.1002/hec.1817. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
2
Is response to price equal for those with higher alcohol consumption?对于那些饮酒量较高的人,他们对价格的反应是否相同?
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Jan;17(1):23-9. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0651-z. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
3
Estimation of own and cross price elasticities of alcohol demand in the UK--A pseudo-panel approach using the Living Costs and Food Survey 2001-2009.英国酒精需求的自身价格弹性和交叉价格弹性估计——一种使用2001 - 2009年生活成本与食品调查的伪面板方法。
J Health Econ. 2014 Mar;34(100):96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Jan 19.
4
Price elasticities of alcohol demand: evidence from Russia.酒精需求的价格弹性:来自俄罗斯的证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2015 Mar;16(2):185-99. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0565-9. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
5
Modelling the effects of alcohol pricing policies on alcohol consumption in subpopulations in Australia.建模澳大利亚亚人群中酒精定价政策对酒精消费的影响。
Addiction. 2020 Jun;115(6):1038-1049. doi: 10.1111/add.14898. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
6
Price elasticity of on- and off-premises demand for alcoholic drinks: A Tobit analysis.酒精饮料店内和店外需求的价格弹性:一项托比特分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Jun 1;163:222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.04.026. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
7
Alcohol quantity and quality price elasticities: quantile regression estimates.酒精饮用量和质量的价格弹性:分位数回归估计。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Apr;20(3):439-454. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-1009-8. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
8
The demand for alcohol: the differential response to price.酒精需求:对价格的差异反应。
J Health Econ. 1995 Jun;14(2):123-48. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(94)00042-3.
9
Heterogenous wealth effects of minimum unit price on purchase of alcohol: Evidence using scanner data.最低单位价格对酒类购买的异质财富效应:使用扫描仪数据的证据。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 5;14(12):e0225538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225538. eCollection 2019.
10
The impact of a 25-cent-per-drink alcohol tax increase.每杯饮料增加 25 美分的酒精税的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Apr;42(4):382-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.12.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Did high sugar-sweetened beverage purchasers respond differently to the excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Mexico?墨西哥购买高糖甜味饮料的人群对高糖甜味饮料消费税的反应是否有所不同?
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Mar;22(4):750-756. doi: 10.1017/S136898001800321X. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
2
Equity impacts of price policies to promote healthy behaviours.促进健康行为的价格政策的公平性影响。
Lancet. 2018 May 19;391(10134):2059-2070. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30531-2. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
3
Comment on "binge drinking and alcohol prices".关于《酗酒与酒精价格》的评论
Health Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;6(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13561-016-0082-x. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
4
Binge drinking and alcohol prices: a systematic review of age-related results from econometric studies, natural experiments and field studies.酗酒与酒精价格:对计量经济学研究、自然实验和实地研究中与年龄相关结果的系统评价
Health Econ Rev. 2015 Feb 12;5:6. doi: 10.1186/s13561-014-0040-4. eCollection 2015.
5
Minimum pricing of alcohol versus volumetric taxation: which policy will reduce heavy consumption without adversely affecting light and moderate consumers?酒精最低定价与按量征税:哪种政策能减少重度饮酒,同时又不对轻度和中度饮酒者产生不利影响?
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e80936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080936. eCollection 2014.
6
The role of alcohol price in young adult drinking cultures in Scotland.
Drugs (Abingdon Engl). 2013 Aug;20(4):278-285. doi: 10.3109/09687637.2013.765386.

本文引用的文献

1
Alcohol demand and risk preference.酒精需求与风险偏好。
J Econ Psychol. 2008 Dec;29(6):810-831. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2008.03.006.
2
Effects of beverage alcohol price and tax levels on drinking: a meta-analysis of 1003 estimates from 112 studies.酒精饮料价格和税收水平对饮酒的影响:对112项研究的1003个估计值的荟萃分析。
Addiction. 2009 Feb;104(2):179-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02438.x.
3
Is prenatal care really ineffective? Or, is the 'devil' in the distribution?产前护理真的无效吗?还是说,“问题”出在其分配上?
J Health Econ. 2005 May;24(3):489-513. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.09.012.
4
The effects of beer taxes on physical child abuse.啤酒税对儿童身体虐待的影响。
J Health Econ. 2000 Mar;19(2):271-82. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(99)00025-9.
5
Program profiles. Elderly problem drinkers and alcoholics.项目简介。老年酗酒者和酒鬼。
Alcohol Health Res World. 1984 Spring;8(3):40-7.
6
The demand for alcohol: the differential response to price.酒精需求:对价格的差异反应。
J Health Econ. 1995 Jun;14(2):123-48. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(94)00042-3.
7
Alcohol consumption and mortality among middle-aged and elderly U.S. adults.美国中老年成年人的饮酒情况与死亡率
N Engl J Med. 1997 Dec 11;337(24):1705-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199712113372401.
8
Control of alcohol consumption through price increase.
J Stud Alcohol. 1980 Sep;41(9):807-18. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1980.41.807.
9
Age, drinking habits and the effects of alcohol.
J Stud Alcohol. 1984 Nov;45(6):517-21. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1984.45.517.
10
Price and income elasticities of demand for alcoholic beverages.酒精饮料需求的价格弹性和收入弹性。
Recent Dev Alcohol. 1983;1:303-45. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3617-4_18.