• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

酒精饮用量和质量的价格弹性:分位数回归估计。

Alcohol quantity and quality price elasticities: quantile regression estimates.

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.

Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Apr;20(3):439-454. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-1009-8. Epub 2018 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-018-1009-8
PMID:30276497
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6438945/
Abstract

Many people drink more than the recommended level of alcohol, with some drinking substantially more. There is evidence that suggests that this leads to large health and social costs, and price is often proposed as a tool for reducing consumption. This paper uses quantile regression methods to estimate the differential price (and income) elasticities across the drinking distribution. This is also done for on-premise (pubs, bars and clubs) and off-premise (supermarkets and shops) alcohol separately. In addition, we examine the extent to which drinkers respond to price changes by varying the 'quality' of the alcohol that they consume. We find that heavy drinkers are much less responsive to price in terms of quantity, but that they are more likely to substitute with cheaper products when the price of alcohol increases. The implication is that price-based policies may have little effect in reducing consumption amongst the heaviest drinkers, provided they can switch to lower quality alternatives.

摘要

许多人饮酒超过建议水平,其中一些人饮酒量相当大。有证据表明,这会导致巨大的健康和社会成本,而价格通常被提议作为减少消费的一种手段。本文使用分位数回归方法估计了整个饮酒分布的差异价格(和收入)弹性。这也分别针对在店(酒吧、酒馆和俱乐部)和离店(超市和商店)酒类进行了研究。此外,我们还考察了饮酒者在多大程度上通过改变所消费的酒类“质量”来对价格变化做出反应。我们发现,大量饮酒者在数量方面对价格的反应要小得多,但当酒类价格上涨时,他们更有可能转而购买更便宜的产品。这意味着,只要他们能够转向低质量的替代品,基于价格的政策可能对减少最重度饮酒者的消费影响不大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c80/6438945/2b48a5124aa2/10198_2018_1009_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c80/6438945/8b49c1117831/10198_2018_1009_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c80/6438945/832877d2e260/10198_2018_1009_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c80/6438945/c93f2cabd7ec/10198_2018_1009_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c80/6438945/57009b5b3b39/10198_2018_1009_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c80/6438945/07e0d9382761/10198_2018_1009_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c80/6438945/2b48a5124aa2/10198_2018_1009_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c80/6438945/8b49c1117831/10198_2018_1009_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c80/6438945/832877d2e260/10198_2018_1009_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c80/6438945/c93f2cabd7ec/10198_2018_1009_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c80/6438945/57009b5b3b39/10198_2018_1009_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c80/6438945/07e0d9382761/10198_2018_1009_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c80/6438945/2b48a5124aa2/10198_2018_1009_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Alcohol quantity and quality price elasticities: quantile regression estimates.酒精饮用量和质量的价格弹性:分位数回归估计。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Apr;20(3):439-454. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-1009-8. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
2
Price elasticity of on- and off-premises demand for alcoholic drinks: A Tobit analysis.酒精饮料店内和店外需求的价格弹性:一项托比特分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Jun 1;163:222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.04.026. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
3
Estimated Effects of Different Alcohol Taxation and Price Policies on Health Inequalities: A Mathematical Modelling Study.不同酒精税和价格政策对健康不平等的估计影响:一项数学建模研究
PLoS Med. 2016 Feb 23;13(2):e1001963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001963. eCollection 2016 Feb.
4
Effects of minimum unit pricing for alcohol on different income and socioeconomic groups: a modelling study.酒精最低单位定价对不同收入和社会经济群体的影响:建模研究。
Lancet. 2014 May 10;383(9929):1655-1664. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62417-4. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
5
The Big Drink Debate: perceptions of the impact of price on alcohol consumption from a large scale cross-sectional convenience survey in north west England.大饮论争:从英格兰西北部一项大规模横断面便利调查看价格对酒类消费的影响看法。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Aug 23;11:664. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-664.
6
Modelling the effects of alcohol pricing policies on alcohol consumption in subpopulations in Australia.建模澳大利亚亚人群中酒精定价政策对酒精消费的影响。
Addiction. 2020 Jun;115(6):1038-1049. doi: 10.1111/add.14898. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
7
Who Purchases Low-Cost Alcohol in Australia?谁在澳大利亚购买低成本酒精饮料?
Alcohol Alcohol. 2015 Nov;50(6):647-53. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agv066. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
8
The demand for alcohol: the differential response to price.酒精需求:对价格的差异反应。
J Health Econ. 1995 Jun;14(2):123-48. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(94)00042-3.
9
Estimation of own and cross price elasticities of alcohol demand in the UK--A pseudo-panel approach using the Living Costs and Food Survey 2001-2009.英国酒精需求的自身价格弹性和交叉价格弹性估计——一种使用2001 - 2009年生活成本与食品调查的伪面板方法。
J Health Econ. 2014 Mar;34(100):96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Jan 19.
10
Alcohol tax pass-through across the product and price range: do retailers treat cheap alcohol differently?酒精税在不同产品和价格区间的转嫁:零售商对低价酒精的处理方式是否不同?
Addiction. 2014 Dec;109(12):1994-2002. doi: 10.1111/add.12590. Epub 2014 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Economic Evaluation and Care Commissioning Focused on Achieving the Same Outcomes? Resource-Allocation Considerations and Challenges Using England as a Case Study.经济评估和委托重点关注相同的结果吗?以英格兰为例的资源配置考虑因素和挑战。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 Jul;22(4):435-445. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00875-3. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
2
Alcoholic beverage types consumed by population subgroups in the United States: Implications for alcohol policy to address health disparities.美国人群亚组消费的酒精饮料类型:解决健康差异的酒精政策的启示。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2024 May;43(4):946-955. doi: 10.1111/dar.13819. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A Behavioral Economic Model of Alcohol Advertising and Price.酒精广告与价格的行为经济学模型
Health Econ. 2016 Jul;25(7):816-28. doi: 10.1002/hec.3186. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
2
All cause mortality and the case for age specific alcohol consumption guidelines: pooled analyses of up to 10 population based cohorts.全因死亡率与特定年龄饮酒量指南的依据:对多达10个基于人群的队列研究的汇总分析
BMJ. 2015 Feb 10;350:h384. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h384.
3
Is response to price equal for those with higher alcohol consumption?对于那些饮酒量较高的人,他们对价格的反应是否相同?
Risky Drinking Cultures Among Affluent Youth in Sweden.
瑞典富裕青年中的冒险饮酒文化。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 8;10:867802. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.867802. eCollection 2022.
4
The behaviour of alcohol-dependent drinkers of spirits during level 4 COVID-19 lockdown in Auckland, New Zealand.新西兰奥克兰在 4 级 COVID-19 封锁期间,烈酒依赖型饮酒者的行为。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2022 Jan;41(1):9-12. doi: 10.1111/dar.13309. Epub 2021 May 19.
5
Washington's liquor license system and alcohol-related adverse health outcomes.华盛顿的酒类许可证制度与酒精相关的不良健康后果。
Addiction. 2021 May;116(5):1043-1053. doi: 10.1111/add.15234. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
6
Evaluation of Minimum Unit Pricing of Alcohol: A Mixed Method Natural Experiment in Scotland.评估酒精最低单位定价:苏格兰混合方法自然实验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 13;17(10):3394. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103394.
7
Heterogenous wealth effects of minimum unit price on purchase of alcohol: Evidence using scanner data.最低单位价格对酒类购买的异质财富效应:使用扫描仪数据的证据。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 5;14(12):e0225538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225538. eCollection 2019.
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Jan;17(1):23-9. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0651-z. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
4
Potential benefits of minimum unit pricing for alcohol versus a ban on below cost selling in England 2014: modelling study.2014年英格兰酒精饮料最低限价与禁止低于成本销售的潜在效益比较:建模研究
BMJ. 2014 Sep 30;349:g5452. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5452.
5
Estimation of own and cross price elasticities of alcohol demand in the UK--A pseudo-panel approach using the Living Costs and Food Survey 2001-2009.英国酒精需求的自身价格弹性和交叉价格弹性估计——一种使用2001 - 2009年生活成本与食品调查的伪面板方法。
J Health Econ. 2014 Mar;34(100):96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Jan 19.
6
Highlighting differences between conditional and unconditional quantile regression approaches through an application to assess medication adherence.通过应用于评估药物依从性的实例来突出条件和无条件分位数回归方法之间的差异。
Health Econ. 2013 Sep;22(9):1052-70. doi: 10.1002/hec.2927. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
7
How is alcohol consumption affected if we account for under-reporting? A hypothetical scenario.如果我们考虑到少报的情况,酒精消费会受到怎样的影响?一个假设的情景。
Eur J Public Health. 2013 Dec;23(6):1076-81. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt016. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
8
Alcohol as a risk factor for liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.酒精作为肝硬化的一个风险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010 Jul;29(4):437-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00153.x.
9
A meta-analysis of alcohol drinking and oral and pharyngeal cancers. Part 1: overall results and dose-risk relation.饮酒与口咽癌的荟萃分析。第 1 部分:总体结果和剂量-风险关系。
Oral Oncol. 2010 Jul;46(7):497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.03.024. Epub 2010 May 4.
10
Estimated effect of alcohol pricing policies on health and health economic outcomes in England: an epidemiological model.估计英国酒精定价政策对健康和健康经济结果的影响:一项流行病学模型。
Lancet. 2010 Apr 17;375(9723):1355-64. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60058-X. Epub 2010 Mar 24.