Suppr超能文献

一种检测B族链球菌定植的快速方法:床边检测

A rapid method for detection of group B streptococcal colonization: testing at the bedside.

作者信息

Wang E, Richardson H

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Nov;76(5 Pt 1):882-5. doi: 10.1097/00006250-199011000-00033.

Abstract

Vertical transmission of group B streptococci, the most frequent cause of early neonatal sepsis, can be interrupted by intrapartum antibiotics. However, rapid methods for detecting colonized women must be developed to limit the administration of antibiotics to those who are at risk of delivering an infected infant. The accuracy of a colorimetric test using starch serum medium on vaginal and rectal specimens from women with preterm labor or prolonged rupture of membranes was evaluated. The test was interpreted by labor and delivery room nurses without special microbiologic training. Starch serum medium results were compared with those obtained from routine cultures. Thirteen of 29 positive vaginal cultures (45%) and eight of 18 positive rectal swabs (44%) were identified by nurses using the rapid method. This was significantly different (P less than .001) from sensitivities of 93 and 95%, respectively, for the same vaginal and rectal specimens interpreted by a bacteriology technologist. The specificity for the test from both sites was 95% for the nurses. The sensitivity was 53 and 36% for vaginal and rectal swabs, respectively, for a subgroup of mothers whose infants were assessed as clinically septic. The low sensitivity of starch serum medium as interpreted by nurses in the labor suite is inadequate to allow the test to replace cultures in identifying women colonized with group B streptococci. Efforts to increase the sensitivity should be directed toward improving nursing staff interpretation rather than improving the medium itself.

摘要

B族链球菌是早期新生儿败血症最常见的病因,其垂直传播可通过产时抗生素加以阻断。然而,必须开发出快速检测带菌女性的方法,以便将抗生素的使用限制在那些有分娩感染婴儿风险的女性身上。我们评估了一种使用淀粉血清培养基对早产或胎膜早破女性的阴道和直肠标本进行比色试验的准确性。该试验由产房护士进行解读,她们未接受过特殊的微生物学培训。将淀粉血清培养基的结果与常规培养获得的结果进行比较。护士使用快速方法识别出了29份阳性阴道培养物中的13份(45%)以及18份阳性直肠拭子中的8份(44%)。这与细菌学技术人员对相同阴道和直肠标本解读的敏感性分别为93%和95%相比,有显著差异(P小于0.001)。护士对两个部位检测的特异性均为95%。对于其婴儿被评估为临床败血症的母亲亚组,阴道和直肠拭子的敏感性分别为53%和36%。产房护士解读的淀粉血清培养基敏感性较低,不足以让该检测方法替代培养法来识别B族链球菌带菌女性。提高敏感性的努力应针对改善护理人员的解读,而非改进培养基本身。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验