Suppr超能文献

两种不同含 CHX 脱敏剂的疗效:一项对照双盲研究。

Efficacy of two different CHX-containing desensitizers: a controlled double-blind study.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Dentistry, University of Goettingen, Germany.

出版信息

Oper Dent. 2012 Mar-Apr;37(2):161-71. doi: 10.2341/10-231-C. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and duration of action of the tooth desensitization agent Cervitec (C) vs that of the new Cervitec Plus (C+). In this monocentric, single-center, three-armed, controlled, double-blind study, 120 subjects were randomly assigned to one of three groups:group I received Cervitec Plus (C+), group II received Cervitec (C), and group III received placebo (P). Varnishes were applied after base-line determination of cervical dentin hyper-sensitivity using a pain score of one or higher.Re-evaluation was performed 1, 7, 30, and 90 days after application. Statistical evaluation was carried out using nonparametric statistics for relative effects and analysis of variance(ANOVA). Thirty days after application of Cand C+, all hypersensitivity decreased significantly in relation to baseline measurements(p<0.001), with no changes taking place in the placebo group. Significant differences were observed between C and C+ vs placebo(p<0.001), whereas no significant difference between C and C+ was seen after 30 days(p=0.840). After 90 days, the reduction in hypersensitivity with C+ was still significant compared with baseline measurements(p=0.001). However, C was not significantly different compared with baseline measurements (p=0.05). Analysis of all hypersensitive posterior teeth examined showed no significant difference between C and C+ after 90 days(p=0.362). For anterior teeth, the difference between C and C+ was significant (p=0.012).Both C and C+ reduce cervical tooth hypersensitivity, whereas C+ reduces hypersensitivity for a longer period of time.

摘要

本研究旨在比较牙脱敏剂 Cervitec(C)和新 Cervitec Plus(C+)的疗效和作用持续时间。在这项单中心、单中心、三臂、对照、双盲研究中,120 名受试者被随机分为三组:I 组接受 Cervitec Plus(C+),II 组接受 Cervitec(C),III 组接受安慰剂(P)。在用疼痛评分 1 或更高值确定颈牙本质超敏度的基线后,应用清漆。应用后 1、7、30 和 90 天进行重新评估。使用相对效果的非参数统计和方差分析(ANOVA)进行统计评估。应用 Cand C+后 30 天,所有超敏度与基线测量相比均显著降低(p<0.001),安慰剂组无变化。C 和 C+与安慰剂相比差异显著(p<0.001),但 30 天后 C 和 C+之间无显著差异(p=0.840)。90 天后,C+的超敏度降低仍与基线测量相比具有显著差异(p=0.001)。然而,C 与基线测量相比无显著差异(p=0.05)。分析所有检查的敏感后牙,90 天后 C 和 C+之间无显著差异(p=0.362)。对于前牙,C 和 C+之间的差异有统计学意义(p=0.012)。C 和 C+均可降低颈牙敏感性,而 C+的作用持续时间更长。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验