Nardi G M, Sabatini S, Lauritano D, Silvestre F, Petruzzi M
Department of Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy.
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Oral Implantol (Rome). 2016 Nov 16;9(4):185-189. doi: 10.11138/orl/2016.9.4.185. eCollection 2016 Oct-Dec.
The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two different desensitizing varnishes.
Ninety healthy adults suffering from tooth sensitivity were divided into three groups. Two different varnishes were used for the study: Fluor Protector S, containing 7700 ppm fluoride (group I), and Cervitec F, containing 1400 ppm fluoride and 0.3% chlorhexidine (group II). A placebo containing water and ethanol was applied for the third group. Tooth sensitivity was collected according the Schiff' scale at baseline and after 30 and 90 days.
Group I and group II improved with statistically significant results. Group III did not show any improvements.
Desensitizing varnishes are a valid treatment for tooth hypersensitivity.
本研究旨在评估和比较两种不同脱敏漆的有效性。
90名患有牙齿敏感的健康成年人被分为三组。本研究使用了两种不同的漆：含7700 ppm氟化物的氟保护剂S（第一组）和含1400 ppm氟化物及0.3%氯己定的Cervitec F（第二组）。第三组使用含蒸馏水和乙醇的安慰剂。在基线以及30天和90天后，根据希夫量表收集牙齿敏感度数据。
第一组和第二组有统计学意义上的显著改善。第三组未显示出任何改善。
脱敏漆是治疗牙齿过敏的有效方法。
