Frazier Thomas W, Shattuck Paul T, Narendorf Sarah Carter, Cooper Benjamin P, Wagner Mary, Spitznagel Edward L
Center for Autism and Center for Pediatric Behavioral Health, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2011 Dec;21(6):571-9. doi: 10.1089/cap.2011.0057. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
Many youths with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) benefit from psychotropic medication treatment of co-morbid symptom patterns consistent with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The lack of clear indications and algorithms to direct clinical practice has led to a very poor understanding of overall medication use for these youths. The present study examined the prevalence of psychotropic medication use compared across individuals with an ASD without a caregiver-reported ADHD diagnosis (ASD-only), ADHD without ASD (ADHD-only), and an ASD with co-morbid ADHD (ASD+ADHD). Correlates of medication use were also examined.
Data on psychotropic medication from the first wave of the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2, a nationally representative study of adolescents ages 13-17 in special education, were used to compare the prevalence of medication use across the three groups, overall and by class. Separate logistic regression models were constructed for each group to examine the correlates of psychotropic medication use. Poisson regression models were used to examine correlates of the number of medications.
Youths with ASD+ADHD had the highest rates of use (58.2%), followed by youths with ADHD-only (49.0%) and youths with ASD-only (34.3%). Youths with an ASD, both ASD-only and ASD+ADHD, used medications across a variety of medication classes, whereas stimulants were dominant among youths with ADHD-only. African American youths with ASD-only and with ASD+ADHD were less likely to receive medication than white youths, whereas race was not associated with medication use in the ADHD-only group.
Clearer practice parameters for ADHD have likely contributed to more consistency in treatment, whereas treatment for ASD reflects a trial and error approach based on associated symptom patterns. Additional studies examining the treatment of core and associated ASD symptoms are needed to guide pharmacologic treatment of these youths. Interventions targeting African American youths with ASD and the physicians who serve them are also warranted.
许多患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的青少年受益于针对与注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)一致的共病症状模式的精神药物治疗。缺乏明确的指导临床实践的指征和算法导致对这些青少年总体用药情况的了解非常有限。本研究比较了未被照料者报告患有ADHD诊断的ASD个体(仅ASD)、无ASD的ADHD个体(仅ADHD)以及患有共病ADHD的ASD个体(ASD+ADHD)中精神药物使用的患病率。还研究了用药的相关因素。
来自全国纵向过渡研究2第一波的数据,这是一项对13至17岁接受特殊教育的青少年进行的具有全国代表性的研究,用于比较三组总体和按类别划分的用药患病率。为每组构建单独的逻辑回归模型以研究精神药物使用的相关因素。使用泊松回归模型研究用药数量的相关因素。
患有ASD+ADHD的青少年使用率最高(58.2%),其次是仅患有ADHD的青少年(49.0%)和仅患有ASD的青少年(34.3%)。患有ASD的青少年,包括仅ASD和ASD+ADHD,使用多种药物类别,而兴奋剂在仅患有ADHD的青少年中占主导地位。仅患有ASD和患有ASD+ADHD的非裔美国青少年比白人青少年接受药物治疗的可能性更小,而种族与仅患有ADHD组的用药情况无关。
更清晰的ADHD实践参数可能有助于治疗更加一致,而ASD的治疗反映了基于相关症状模式的试错方法。需要进一步研究检查ASD核心症状和相关症状的治疗,以指导这些青少年的药物治疗。针对患有ASD的非裔美国青少年及其服务医生的干预措施也很有必要。