相似文献
1
dbGaP data access requests: a call for greater transparency.
Sci Transl Med. 2011 Dec 14;3(113):113cm34. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002788.
2
dbGaPCheckup: pre-submission checks of dbGaP-formatted subject phenotype files.
BMC Bioinformatics. 2023 Mar 3;24(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05200-8.
3
The NCBI dbGaP database of genotypes and phenotypes.
Nat Genet. 2007 Oct;39(10):1181-6. doi: 10.1038/ng1007-1181.
4
Ethical aspects of participation in the database of genotypes and phenotypes of the National Center for Biotechnology Information: the Cancer and Leukemia Group B Experience.
Cancer. 2012 Oct 15;118(20):5060-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27515. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
5
The dbGaP data browser: a new tool for browsing dbGaP controlled-access genomic data.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jan 4;45(D1):D819-D826. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1139. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
6
A mechanism for controlled access to GWAS data: experience of the GAIN Data Access Committee.
Am J Hum Genet. 2013 Apr 4;92(4):479-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.08.034.
7
NCBI's Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes: dbGaP.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D975-9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1211. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
8
dbgap2x: an R package to explore and extract data from the database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP).
Bioinformatics. 2020 Feb 15;36(4):1305-1306. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz680.
9
The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.
Oncologist. 2015 May;20(5):464-e20. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0431. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
10
Characteristics of available studies and dissemination of research using major clinical data sharing platforms.
Clin Trials. 2021 Dec;18(6):657-666. doi: 10.1177/17407745211038524. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
引用本文的文献
1
Computational resources associating diseases with genotypes, phenotypes and exposures.
Brief Bioinform. 2019 Nov 27;20(6):2098-2115. doi: 10.1093/bib/bby071.
2
One Size Doesn't Fit All: Measuring Individual Privacy in Aggregate Genomic Data.
Proc IEEE Symp Secur Priv Workshops. 2015;2015:41-49. doi: 10.1109/SPW.2015.25. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
3
Use of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Data Repository.
N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1849-1858. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1603542. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
4
Controlled Access under Review: Improving the Governance of Genomic Data Access.
PLoS Biol. 2015 Dec 31;13(12):e1002339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002339. eCollection 2015 Dec.
5
The Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort: A publicly available resource for the study of normal and abnormal brain development in youth.
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 1;124(Pt B):1115-1119. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.056. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
6
Exploring pathways to trust: a tribal perspective on data sharing.
Genet Med. 2014 Nov;16(11):820-6. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.47. Epub 2014 May 15.
7
The National Institutes of Health's Biomedical Translational Research Information System (BTRIS): design, contents, functionality and experience to date.
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Dec;52:11-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
8
PhenDisco: phenotype discovery system for the database of genotypes and phenotypes.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):31-6. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001882. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
9
A mechanism for controlled access to GWAS data: experience of the GAIN Data Access Committee.
Am J Hum Genet. 2013 Apr 4;92(4):479-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.08.034.
10
Evolving approaches to the ethical management of genomic data.
Trends Genet. 2013 Jun;29(6):375-82. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
本文引用的文献
1
Ethical and practical challenges of sharing data from genome-wide association studies: the eMERGE Consortium experience.
Genome Res. 2011 Jul;21(7):1001-7. doi: 10.1101/gr.120329.111. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
2
Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf.
Science. 2011 Jan 21;331(6015):287-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1199000.
3
Glad you asked: participants' opinions of re-consent for dbGap data submission.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Sep;5(3):9-16. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.3.9.
4
Meeting the governance challenges of next-generation biorepository research.
Sci Transl Med. 2010 Jan 20;2(15):15cm3. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000361.
5
Attitudes toward genetic research review: results from a national survey of professionals involved in human subjects protection.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Mar;5(1):83-91. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.1.83.
6
Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.
Am J Hum Genet. 2009 Nov;85(5):643-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.002. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
7
Protecting aggregate genomic data.
Science. 2008 Oct 3;322(5898):44. doi: 10.1126/science.322.5898.44b. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
8
Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using high-density SNP genotyping microarrays.
PLoS Genet. 2008 Aug 29;4(8):e1000167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000167.
9
The NCBI dbGaP database of genotypes and phenotypes.
Nat Genet. 2007 Oct;39(10):1181-6. doi: 10.1038/ng1007-1181.
Zotero 插件