Suppr超能文献

语音发育迟缓儿童的密度、频率和表现性语音。

Density, frequency and the expressive phonology of children with phonological delay.

机构信息

Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.

出版信息

J Child Lang. 2012 Sep;39(4):804-34. doi: 10.1017/S0305000911000304. Epub 2011 Dec 19.

Abstract

The effect of word-level variables on expressive phonology has not been widely studied, although the properties of words likely bear on the emergence of sound structure (Stoel-Gammon, 2011). Eight preschoolers, diagnosed with phonological delay, were assigned to treatment to experimentally induce gains in expressive phonology. Erred sounds were taught using stimulus words that varied orthogonally in neighborhood density and word frequency as the independent variables. Generalization was the dependent variable, defined as production accuracy of treated and untreated (erred) sounds. Blocked comparisons showed that dense neighborhoods triggered greater generalization, but frequency did not have a clear differential effect. Orthogonal comparisons revealed graded effects, with frequent words from dense neighborhoods being optimal for generalization. The results contrast with prior literature, which has reported a sparse neighborhood advantage for children with phonological delay. There is a suggestion that children with phonological delay require greater than usual cue redundancy and convergence to prompt expressive phonological learning.

摘要

词级变量对表达性语音的影响尚未得到广泛研究,尽管词的属性可能对语音结构的出现产生影响(Stoel-Gammon,2011)。8 名被诊断为语音延迟的学龄前儿童被分配到治疗组,以通过实验诱导表达性语音的提高。错误的音被使用在邻密度和词频上呈正交变化的刺激词来教授,作为自变量。泛化是因变量,定义为治疗和未治疗(错误)音的产生准确性。分组比较表明,密集的邻域引发了更大的泛化,但频率并没有产生明显的差异效果。正交比较显示出渐进的效果,来自密集邻域的高频词最有利于泛化。结果与先前的文献形成对比,先前的文献报告了语音延迟儿童稀疏邻域的优势。有迹象表明,语音延迟儿童需要比通常更多的冗余和收敛提示来促进表达性语音学习。

相似文献

1
Density, frequency and the expressive phonology of children with phonological delay.
J Child Lang. 2012 Sep;39(4):804-34. doi: 10.1017/S0305000911000304. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
2
How to meet the neighbors: Modality effects on phonological generalization.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2014 Jul-Aug;28(7-8):477-92. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2014.926992.
3
Early phonological development: creating an assessment test.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2013 Apr;27(4):278-86. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2013.766764.
4
Intelligibility as a clinical outcome measure following intervention with children with phonologically based speech-sound disorders.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Sep-Oct;49(5):584-601. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12095. Epub 2014 May 26.
5
Promoting Speech Intelligibility in Autism Spectrum Disorder through the Implementation of Phonologically Similar Stimuli.
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2021;73(3):174-184. doi: 10.1159/000511346. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
6
I remembered the chorm! Word learning abilities of children with and without phonological impairment.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 May-Jun;59(3):913-931. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12967. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
8
Assessing phonology in young children.
Clin Commun Disord. 1991 Summer;1(2):25-39.
9
What factors place children with speech sound disorders at risk for reading problems?
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011 May;20(2):146-60. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0053). Epub 2011 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Speech Intervention Outcomes Associated With Word Lexicality and Intervention Intensity.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2019 Jan 28;50(1):83-98. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-18-0026.
2
Neighborhood Density and Syntactic Class Effects on Spoken Word Recognition: Specific Language Impairment and Typical Development.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 May 17;61(5):1226-1237. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0099.
3
Nexus to Lexis: Phonological Disorders in Children.
Semin Speech Lang. 2016 Nov;37(4):280-290. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1587704. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
4
Effect Size for Single-Subject Design in Phonological Treatment.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Oct;58(5):1464-81. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-14-0299.
5
Dense neighborhoods and mechanisms of learning: evidence from children with phonological delay.
J Child Lang. 2015 Sep;42(5):1036-72. doi: 10.1017/S0305000914000701. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
6
How to meet the neighbors: Modality effects on phonological generalization.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2014 Jul-Aug;28(7-8):477-92. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2014.926992.
7
Grammatical treatment and specific language impairment: neighbourhood density & third person singular -s.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2013 Sep;27(9):661-80. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2013.789928. Epub 2013 Jul 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Speech Perception, Word Recognition and the Structure of the Lexicon.
Speech Commun. 1985 Aug;4(1-3):75-95. doi: 10.1016/0167-6393(85)90037-8.
2
Age of word acquisition effects in treatment of children with phonological delays.
Appl Psycholinguist. 2012 Jan 1;33(1):121-144. doi: 10.1017/S0142716411000294.
3
Effect size in clinical phonology.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2011 Nov;25(11-12):975-80. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2011.601392. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
5
The dynamics of lexical competition during spoken word recognition.
Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;31(1):133-56. doi: 10.1080/03640210709336987.
6
Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children.
J Child Lang. 2011 Jan;38(1):1-34. doi: 10.1017/S0305000910000425. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
8
Nonwords and generalization in children with phonological disorders.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010 May;19(2):167-77. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2009/09-0020). Epub 2010 Jan 19.
9
Word learning by children with phonological delays: differentiating effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density.
J Commun Disord. 2010 Mar-Apr;43(2):105-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
10
Lexical effects on spoken-word recognition in children with normal hearing.
Ear Hear. 2010 Feb;31(1):102-14. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181b7892f.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验