Suppr超能文献

密集社区与学习机制:来自语音延迟儿童的证据

Dense neighborhoods and mechanisms of learning: evidence from children with phonological delay.

作者信息

Gierut Judith A, Morrisette Michele L

机构信息

Indiana University,USA.

出版信息

J Child Lang. 2015 Sep;42(5):1036-72. doi: 10.1017/S0305000914000701. Epub 2014 Oct 31.

Abstract

There is a noted advantage of dense neighborhoods in language acquisition, but the learning mechanism that drives the effect is not well understood. Two hypotheses--long-term auditory word priming and phonological working memory--have been advanced in the literature as viable accounts. These were evaluated in two treatment studies enrolling twelve children with phonological delay. Study 1 exposed children to dense neighbors versus non-neighbors before training sound production in evaluation of the priming hypothesis. Study 2 exposed children to the same stimuli after training sound production as a test of the phonological working memory hypothesis. Results showed that neighbors led to greater phonological generalization than non-neighbors, but only when presented prior to training production. There was little generalization and no differential effect of exposure to neighbors or non-neighbors after training production. Priming was thus supported as a possible mechanism of learning behind the dense neighborhood advantage in phonological acquisition.

摘要

在语言习得方面,密集邻里环境存在一个显著优势,但驱动这一效应的学习机制尚未得到充分理解。文献中提出了两种假说——长期听觉单词启动和语音工作记忆——作为可行的解释。在两项针对12名语音发育迟缓儿童的治疗研究中对这些假说进行了评估。研究1在训练发声之前,让儿童接触密集邻里环境中的声音与非邻里环境中的声音,以评估启动假说。研究2在训练发声之后,让儿童接触相同的刺激,作为对语音工作记忆假说的测试。结果表明,邻里环境中的声音比非邻里环境中的声音能带来更大的语音泛化,但前提是在训练发声之前呈现。在训练发声之后,几乎没有泛化,接触邻里环境或非邻里环境的声音也没有差异效应。因此,启动被认为是语音习得中密集邻里环境优势背后可能的学习机制。

相似文献

1
Dense neighborhoods and mechanisms of learning: evidence from children with phonological delay.
J Child Lang. 2015 Sep;42(5):1036-72. doi: 10.1017/S0305000914000701. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
2
How to meet the neighbors: Modality effects on phonological generalization.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2014 Jul-Aug;28(7-8):477-92. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2014.926992.
3
Density, frequency and the expressive phonology of children with phonological delay.
J Child Lang. 2012 Sep;39(4):804-34. doi: 10.1017/S0305000911000304. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
4
5
Low intensity phonological awareness training in a preschool classroom for children with communication impairments.
J Commun Disord. 2005 Jan-Feb;38(1):65-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2004.03.009.
6
Phonological processing skills of adolescents with residual speech sound errors.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2007 Oct;38(4):297-308. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2007/032).
7
Word-frequency and phonological-neighborhood effects on verbal short-term memory.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Nov;28(6):1019-34. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.6.1019.
8
Speech perception training can facilitate sound production learning.
J Speech Hear Res. 1994 Apr;37(2):347-57. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3702.347.
9
Systematic sound preference in phonological disorders: a case study.
J Commun Disord. 1991 Apr;24(2):79-87. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(91)90012-8.
10
The effect of target-selection strategy on phonological learning.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001 Jun;44(3):610-23. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2001/050).

引用本文的文献

1
Extending Complexity to Word-Final Position via Telepractice: Intervention Effects for English-Speaking Children With Speech Sound Disorder.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2025 Jan 9;56(1):42-57. doi: 10.1044/2024_LSHSS-24-00020. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
2
Speech Intervention Outcomes Associated With Word Lexicality and Intervention Intensity.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2019 Jan 28;50(1):83-98. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-18-0026.
3
Nexus to Lexis: Phonological Disorders in Children.
Semin Speech Lang. 2016 Nov;37(4):280-290. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1587704. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
4
How to meet the neighbors: Modality effects on phonological generalization.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2014 Jul-Aug;28(7-8):477-92. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2014.926992.

本文引用的文献

1
How to meet the neighbors: Modality effects on phonological generalization.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2014 Jul-Aug;28(7-8):477-92. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2014.926992.
2
Grammatical treatment and specific language impairment: neighbourhood density & third person singular -s.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2013 Sep;27(9):661-80. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2013.789928. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
4
Age of word acquisition effects in treatment of children with phonological delays.
Appl Psycholinguist. 2012 Jan 1;33(1):121-144. doi: 10.1017/S0142716411000294.
5
Statistical learning in emerging lexicons: the case of Danish.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Oct;55(5):1265-73. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/10-0291). Epub 2012 Jan 31.
6
Lexical and phonological effects in early word production.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Apr;55(2):596-608. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0113). Epub 2011 Dec 29.
7
Density, frequency and the expressive phonology of children with phonological delay.
J Child Lang. 2012 Sep;39(4):804-34. doi: 10.1017/S0305000911000304. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
8
Effect size in clinical phonology.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2011 Nov;25(11-12):975-80. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2011.601392. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
9
Beyond syntactic priming: evidence for activation of alternative syntactic structures.
J Child Lang. 2012 Mar;39(2):258-83. doi: 10.1017/S0305000911000055. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
10
Statistical, practical, clinical, and personal significance: definitions and applications in speech-language pathology.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011 Aug;20(3):233-42. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0034). Epub 2011 Apr 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验