Gierut Judith A, Morrisette Michele L
Indiana University,USA.
J Child Lang. 2015 Sep;42(5):1036-72. doi: 10.1017/S0305000914000701. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
There is a noted advantage of dense neighborhoods in language acquisition, but the learning mechanism that drives the effect is not well understood. Two hypotheses--long-term auditory word priming and phonological working memory--have been advanced in the literature as viable accounts. These were evaluated in two treatment studies enrolling twelve children with phonological delay. Study 1 exposed children to dense neighbors versus non-neighbors before training sound production in evaluation of the priming hypothesis. Study 2 exposed children to the same stimuli after training sound production as a test of the phonological working memory hypothesis. Results showed that neighbors led to greater phonological generalization than non-neighbors, but only when presented prior to training production. There was little generalization and no differential effect of exposure to neighbors or non-neighbors after training production. Priming was thus supported as a possible mechanism of learning behind the dense neighborhood advantage in phonological acquisition.
在语言习得方面,密集邻里环境存在一个显著优势,但驱动这一效应的学习机制尚未得到充分理解。文献中提出了两种假说——长期听觉单词启动和语音工作记忆——作为可行的解释。在两项针对12名语音发育迟缓儿童的治疗研究中对这些假说进行了评估。研究1在训练发声之前,让儿童接触密集邻里环境中的声音与非邻里环境中的声音,以评估启动假说。研究2在训练发声之后,让儿童接触相同的刺激,作为对语音工作记忆假说的测试。结果表明,邻里环境中的声音比非邻里环境中的声音能带来更大的语音泛化,但前提是在训练发声之前呈现。在训练发声之后,几乎没有泛化,接触邻里环境或非邻里环境的声音也没有差异效应。因此,启动被认为是语音习得中密集邻里环境优势背后可能的学习机制。