Suppr超能文献

Elecsys HBsAg II与Architect HBsAg QT检测法在HIV和乙肝病毒合并感染患者中对乙肝表面抗原定量的比较。

Comparison between Elecsys HBsAg II and architect HBsAg QT assays for quantification of hepatitis B surface antigen among patients coinfected with HIV and hepatitis B virus.

作者信息

Maylin Sarah, Boyd Anders, Delaugerre Constance, Zoulim Fabien, Lavocat Fabien, Simon François, Girard Pierre-Marie, Lacombe Karine

机构信息

Laboratoire de Virologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, Paris, France.

出版信息

Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012 Feb;19(2):242-8. doi: 10.1128/CVI.05454-11. Epub 2011 Dec 21.

Abstract

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) quantification has been steadily gaining interest as a clinical marker of therapeutic efficacy, for which two commercial assays are currently available: Architect HBsAg QT (Architect) and Elecsys HBsAg II (Elecsys). HBsAg quantification was evaluated using both assays in 126 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV)-coinfected patients initiating treatment with tenofovir dipivoxil fumarate. Linear regression and correlation were used to establish the relationship between the two methods. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to determine mean between-assay difference and limits of agreement (LOA) (±2 standard deviations [SD]) both overall and stratified on HBV (hepatitis B envelope antigen [HBeAg] status, replication, genotype, HBV mutants) or HIV (CD4(+) cell count) cofactors. There was a significant correlation between Elecsys and Architect assays (correlation coefficient, r = 0.959; P < 0.001). HBsAg quantification using the Elecsys assay was on average 0.200 log(10) IU/ml (LOA, -0.500, 0.800) higher than that using Architect, which was consistent across levels of CD4(+) cell count, presence of precore and YMDD mutations, and HBeAg status. A slightly larger mean between-assay difference was observed with genotypes A and G (0.196 and 0.201, respectively) versus HBV genotypes D and E (0.036 and 0.030, respectively). Mutations on the S region at position s120/s145 were the only determinant in which the mean between-assay difference in HBsAg quantification was lower than the null value (-0.078). In conclusion, the Elecsys assay, with automatic on-board dilution, is capable of quantifying serum HBsAg levels in HIV-HBV-coinfected patients, with very high correlation with the Architect assay.

摘要

乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)定量作为治疗效果的临床标志物,其关注度一直在稳步上升,目前有两种商业检测方法:Architect HBsAg QT(Architect)和Elecsys HBsAg II(Elecsys)。在126例开始接受富马酸替诺福韦酯治疗的人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)和乙肝病毒(HBV)合并感染患者中,使用这两种检测方法对HBsAg进行了定量评估。采用线性回归和相关性分析来确定两种方法之间的关系。进行Bland-Altman分析,以确定整体以及根据HBV(乙肝e抗原[HBeAg]状态、复制情况、基因型、HBV突变体)或HIV(CD4(+)细胞计数)辅助因子分层后的检测间平均差异和一致性界限(LOA)(±2标准差[SD])。Elecsys和Architect检测之间存在显著相关性(相关系数,r = 0.959;P < 0.001)。使用Elecsys检测法对HBsAg的定量平均比使用Architect检测法高0.200 log(10) IU/ml(LOA,-0.500,0.800),在CD4(+)细胞计数水平、前核心和YMDD突变的存在情况以及HBeAg状态方面均保持一致。与HBV基因型D和E(分别为0.036和0.030)相比,基因型A和G的检测间平均差异略大(分别为0.196和0.201)。s120/s145位置S区域的突变是唯一使得HBsAg定量检测间平均差异低于零值(-0.078)的决定因素。总之,具有自动机载稀释功能的Elecsys检测法能够对HIV-HBV合并感染患者的血清HBsAg水平进行定量,与Architect检测法具有非常高的相关性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Update on hepatitis B and C virus diagnosis.乙型和丙型肝炎病毒诊断的最新进展。
World J Virol. 2015 Nov 12;4(4):323-42. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v4.i4.323.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验