Servicio de Micología, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Dec;18(12):1229-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03732.x. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
In this paper we report on the development and validation of two different methods for posaconazole quantification from serum samples, HPLC/UV and bioassay. Both methods have been validated according to international guidelines and were also applied to the analysis of 61 trough serum samples from treated patients. A good correlation between both methods was observed. The HPLC method, more laborious and expensive, was demonstrated to be more accurate, precise and faster (analytical range 0.125-16 μg/mL, accuracy between -2.48 and 3.70% and precision between 2.77 and 5.93%, with an analytical run time of 11 min), making it a valuable tool for reference laboratories that centralize high numbers of samples. The microbiological method, however, is simple and offers sufficient precision and accuracy (analytical range 0.125-16 μg/mL, accuracy between -8.10 and 3.77% and a precision between 4.52 and 10.07%), to be used to monitor posaconazole. It may be a valid alternative to chromatographic methods in clinical laboratories without specialized facilities.
本文报告了两种不同的方法,用于从血清样本中定量泊沙康唑,分别为 HPLC/UV 和生物测定法。这两种方法均按照国际指南进行了验证,并应用于 61 份来自治疗患者的谷浓度血清样本的分析。两种方法之间观察到了良好的相关性。HPLC 方法虽然繁琐且昂贵,但具有更高的准确性、精密度和更快的分析速度(分析范围为 0.125-16μg/mL,准确度在-2.48%和 3.70%之间,精密度在 2.77%和 5.93%之间,分析运行时间为 11 分钟),使其成为集中处理大量样本的参考实验室的有价值工具。然而,微生物学方法简单,提供了足够的精密度和准确度(分析范围为 0.125-16μg/mL,准确度在-8.10%和 3.77%之间,精密度在 4.52%和 10.07%之间),可用于监测泊沙康唑。对于没有专业设备的临床实验室,它可能是色谱方法的有效替代方法。