• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉支架置入术后出血性脑过度灌注综合征的术中预测。

Intraprocedural prediction of hemorrhagic cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid artery stenting.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Chikushino, Japan.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Jul;22(5):615-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.10.015. Epub 2011 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.10.015
PMID:22209646
Abstract

Hyperperfusion syndrome (HPS) is a rare but severe complication after carotid artery stenting (CAS). Reliable methods for predicting HPS remain to be developed. We aimed to establish a predictive value of hemorrhagic HPS after CAS. Our retrospective study included 136 consecutive patients who had undergone CAS. We determined the cerebral circulation time (CCT) by measuring the interval between the point of maximal opacification of the terminal portion of the internal carotid artery and the cortical vein. We calculated intraprocedural CCT changes (ΔCCT) by subtracting postprocedural CCT values from preprocedural CCT values. The mean ΔCCT was 0.9 ± 0.9 seconds; 3 patients (2.2%) with prolonged ΔCCT (2.7, 5.4, and 5.8 seconds) developed HPS. The cutoff time of 2.7 seconds predicted hemorrhagic HPS retrospectively with 100% sensitivity and 99% specificity. Our findings suggest that post-CAS HPS can be predicted by using the ΔCCT value obtained by intraprocedural digital subtraction angiography. Patients with a ΔCCT >2.7 seconds require careful intensive hemodynamic and neurologic monitoring after CAS.

摘要

高灌注综合征(HPS)是颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)后一种罕见但严重的并发症。目前仍需要开发可靠的方法来预测 HPS。我们旨在建立 CAS 后出血性 HPS 的预测价值。我们的回顾性研究纳入了 136 例连续接受 CAS 的患者。我们通过测量颈内动脉终末部分最浓显点与皮质静脉之间的间隔来确定脑循环时间(CCT)。我们通过从术前 CCT 值中减去术后 CCT 值来计算术中 CCT 变化(ΔCCT)。平均 ΔCCT 为 0.9±0.9 秒;3 名(2.2%)患者的 ΔCCT 延长(2.7、5.4 和 5.8 秒)发生了 HPS。2.7 秒的截止时间可预测出血性 HPS,其敏感性为 100%,特异性为 99%。我们的研究结果表明,可通过术中数字减影血管造影获得的 ΔCCT 值来预测 CAS 后 HPS。ΔCCT>2.7 秒的患者在 CAS 后需要仔细进行强化血流动力学和神经监测。

相似文献

1
Intraprocedural prediction of hemorrhagic cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术后出血性脑过度灌注综合征的术中预测。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Jul;22(5):615-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.10.015. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
2
Hyperperfusion syndrome following carotid artery stenting: the largest single-operator series to date.颈动脉支架置入术后的高灌注综合征:迄今为止最大的单术者系列研究。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2009 Jan;21(1):27-30.
3
Hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid revascularization.颈动脉血运重建术后的高灌注综合征
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Apr;49(4):1060-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.11.026. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
4
Intraprocedural changes in angiographic cerebral circulation time predict cerebral blood flow after carotid artery stenting.血管造影脑循环时间的术中变化可预测颈动脉支架置入术后的脑血流量。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2010;50(4):269-74. doi: 10.2176/nmc.50.269.
5
Intracranial hemorrhage and hyperperfusion syndrome following carotid artery stenting: risk factors, prevention, and treatment.颈动脉支架置入术后的颅内出血和高灌注综合征:危险因素、预防及治疗
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 May 5;43(9):1596-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.039.
6
Staged carotid artery angioplasty and stenting for patients with high-grade carotid stenosis with high risk of developing hyperperfusion injury: a retrospective analysis of 44 cases.分期颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术治疗伴有高灌注损伤风险的重度颈动脉狭窄患者:44 例回顾性分析。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2016 Dec 19;1(4):147-153. doi: 10.1136/svn-2016-000024. eCollection 2016 Dec.
7
Posterior circulation hyperperfusion syndrome after bilateral vertebral artery intracranial stenting.双侧椎动脉颅内支架置入术后的后循环高灌注综合征
Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 Sep-Oct;23(5):686.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.09.006. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
8
Safety and efficacy of staged angioplasty for patients at risk of hyperperfusion syndrome: a single-center retrospective study.分期血管成形术治疗高灌注综合征高危患者的安全性和有效性:单中心回顾性研究。
Neuroradiology. 2020 Apr;62(4):503-510. doi: 10.1007/s00234-019-02343-5. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
9
Prediction of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid artery stenting by CT perfusion imaging with acetazolamide challenge.通过乙酰唑胺激发CT灌注成像预测颈动脉支架置入术后的脑过度灌注综合征
Neuroradiology. 2016 Mar;58(3):253-9. doi: 10.1007/s00234-015-1623-4. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
10
The role of perfusion computed tomography in the prediction of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome.灌注 CT 在预测脑过度灌注综合征中的作用。
PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019886. Epub 2011 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Flat Detector CT with Cerebral Pooled Blood Volume Perfusion in the Angiography Suite: From Diagnostics to Treatment Monitoring.血管造影套件中采用脑血池容积灌注的平板探测器CT:从诊断到治疗监测
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Aug 13;12(8):1962. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12081962.
2
Update on cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome.脑高灌注综合征更新。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Aug;12(8):788-793. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015621. Epub 2020 May 15.
3
Factors influencing blood flow resistance from a large internal carotid artery aneurysm revealed by a computational fluid dynamics model.
通过计算流体动力学模型揭示的影响大型颈内动脉瘤血流阻力的因素。
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2019 Nov;81(4):629-636. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.81.4.629.
4
Clinical Impact of Intracerebral Hemorrhage after Hyperacute Extracranial Stenting in Patients with Ischemic Stroke.缺血性中风患者超急性颅外支架置入术后脑出血的临床影响
Neurointervention. 2019 Sep;14(2):107-115. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2019.00108. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
5
Change in Cerebral Blood Flow after Palliative Percutaneous Angioplasty and Timing of Second Stage Carotid Artery Stenting in Staged Angioplasty.姑息性经皮血管成形术后脑血流的变化及分期血管成形术中二期颈动脉支架置入的时机
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2018 Jun 15;58(6):254-259. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2018-0027. Epub 2018 May 11.
6
Automatic flow analysis of digital subtraction angiography using independent component analysis in patients with carotid stenosis.采用独立成分分析对颈动脉狭窄患者进行数字减影血管造影的自动血流分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 26;12(9):e0185330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185330. eCollection 2017.
7
Changes in contrast transit times on digital subtraction angiography post-Pipeline Embolization Device deployment.Pipeline栓塞装置植入后数字减影血管造影的对比剂通过时间变化
Interv Neuroradiol. 2017 Apr;23(2):137-142. doi: 10.1177/1591019916685892. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
8
Clinical Comparison of Outcomes of Early versus Delayed Carotid Artery Stenting for Symptomatic Cerebral Watershed Infarction due to Stenosis of the Proximal Internal Carotid Artery.颈内动脉近端狭窄所致症状性脑分水岭梗死早期与延迟颈动脉支架置入术结局的临床比较
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:6241546. doi: 10.1155/2016/6241546. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
9
Changes of time-attenuation curve blood flow parameters in patients with and without carotid stenosis.有和没有颈动脉狭窄的患者时间-衰减曲线血流参数的变化。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Jun;36(6):1176-81. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4239. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
10
Extra-aneurysmal flow modification following pipeline embolization device implantation: focus on regional branches, perforators, and the parent vessel.管道栓塞装置植入后的动脉瘤外血流改变:聚焦于区域分支、穿支血管及母血管
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Apr;36(4):725-31. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4191. Epub 2014 Dec 18.