Suppr超能文献

社会经济支持可减少乌干达综合性社区艾滋病病毒治疗方案中的非保留率。

Socioeconomic support reduces nonretention in a comprehensive, community-based antiretroviral therapy program in Uganda.

机构信息

Medical Department, Reach Out Mbuya HIV/AIDS Initiative, Kampala, Uganda.

出版信息

J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012 Apr 1;59(4):e52-9. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318246e2aa.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the benefit of socioeconomic support (S-E support), comprising various financial and nonfinancial services that are available based on assessment of need, in reducing mortality and lost to follow-up (LTFU) at Reach Out Mbuya, a community-based, antiretroviral therapy program in Uganda.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort data from adult patients enrolled between May 31, 2001, and May 31, 2010, were examined.

METHODS

Patients were categorized into none, 1, and 2 or more S-E support based on the number of different S-E support services they received. Using Cox proportional hazards regression, we modeled the association between S-E support and mortality or LTFU. Kaplan-Meier curves were fitted to examine retention functions stratified by S-E support.

RESULTS

In total, 6654 patients were evaluated. After 10 years, 2700 (41%) were retained. Of the 3954 not retained, 2933 (74%) were LTFU and 1021 (26%) had died. After 1, 2, 5, and 10 years, the risks of LTFU or mortality in patients who received no S-E support were significantly higher than those who received some S-E support. In adjusted hazards ratios, patients who received no S-E support were 1.5-fold (1.39-1.64) and 6.7-fold (5.56-7.69) more likely to get LTFU compared with those who received 1 or ≥ 2 S-E support, respectively. Likewise, patients who received no S-E support were 1.5-fold (confidence interval: 1.16 to 1.89) and 4.3-fold (confidence interval: 2.94 to 6.25) more likely to die compared with those who received 1 or 2+ S-E support, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Provision of S-E support reduced LTFU and mortality, suggesting the value of incorporating such strategies for promoting continuity of care.

摘要

目的

我们评估了社会经济支持(S-E 支持)的益处,该支持包括根据需要评估提供的各种财务和非财务服务,以降低乌干达 Reach Out Mbuya 社区为基础的抗逆转录病毒治疗项目中的死亡率和失访率(LTFU)。

设计

对 2001 年 5 月 31 日至 2010 年 5 月 31 日期间登记的成年患者的回顾性观察队列数据进行了检查。

方法

根据患者接受的不同 S-E 支持服务的数量,将患者分为无、1 和 2 或更多 S-E 支持。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型,我们对 S-E 支持与死亡率或 LTFU 之间的关联进行建模。Kaplan-Meier 曲线用于检查按 S-E 支持分层的保留功能。

结果

共有 6654 名患者接受了评估。10 年后,有 2700 名(41%)患者得到保留。在未保留的 3954 名患者中,有 2933 名(74%)为 LTFU,1021 名(26%)死亡。在 1、2、5 和 10 年后,未接受 S-E 支持的患者发生 LTFU 或死亡的风险明显高于接受 S-E 支持的患者。在调整后的风险比中,未接受 S-E 支持的患者发生 LTFU 的可能性分别是接受 1 种或≥2 种 S-E 支持的患者的 1.5 倍(1.39-1.64)和 6.7 倍(5.56-7.69)。同样,未接受 S-E 支持的患者死亡的可能性分别是接受 1 种或 2 种以上 S-E 支持的患者的 1.5 倍(置信区间:1.16 至 1.89)和 4.3 倍(置信区间:2.94 至 6.25)。

结论

提供 S-E 支持可降低 LTFU 和死亡率,表明纳入此类策略促进护理连续性具有价值。

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic support reduces nonretention in a comprehensive, community-based antiretroviral therapy program in Uganda.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012 Apr 1;59(4):e52-9. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318246e2aa.
4
Return to normal life after AIDS as a reason for lost to follow-up in a community-based antiretroviral treatment program.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012 Jun 1;60(2):e36-45. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3182526e6a.
6
Loss to follow-up and mortality among HIV-infected adolescents receiving antiretroviral therapy in Pune, India.
HIV Med. 2018 Jul;19(6):395-402. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12605. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
8
Loss to follow-up among youth accessing outpatient HIV care and treatment services in Kisumu, Kenya.
AIDS Care. 2016;28(4):500-7. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2015.1110234. Epub 2015 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

6
HIV care policy in India: A review of social security schemes.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 May;11(5):1648-1657. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1755_21. Epub 2022 May 14.
7
ART use and associated factors among HIV positive caregivers of orphans and vulnerable children in Tanzania.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 17;20(1):1251. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09361-6.
9
Socioeconomic position and ten-year survival and virologic outcomes in a Ugandan HIV cohort receiving antiretroviral therapy.
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 15;12(12):e0189055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189055. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

2
Client and provider perspectives of the efficiency and quality of care in the context of rapid scale-up of antiretroviral therapy.
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2010 Nov;24(11):719-27. doi: 10.1089/apc.2010.0108. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
3
Loss to care and death before antiretroviral therapy in Durban, South Africa.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009 Jun 1;51(2):135-9. doi: 10.1097/qai.0b013e3181a44ef2.
5
Antiretroviral therapy and early mortality in South Africa.
Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Sep;86(9):678-87. doi: 10.2471/blt.07.045294.
6
Overestimates of survival after HAART: implications for global scale-up efforts.
PLoS One. 2008 Mar 5;3(3):e1725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001725.
8
Patient retention in antiretroviral therapy programs in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.
PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040298.
9
True outcomes for patients on antiretroviral therapy who are "lost to follow-up" in Malawi.
Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Jul;85(7):550-4. doi: 10.2471/blt.06.037739.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验