• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚助产士在分娩中使用无菌水注射减轻疼痛的知识和使用情况的横断面研究。

Cross sectional study of Australian midwives knowledge and use of sterile water injections for pain relief in labour.

机构信息

Australian Catholic University, Qld 4014, Australia.

出版信息

Women Birth. 2012 Dec;25(4):e74-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2011.11.002. Epub 2012 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.wombi.2011.11.002
PMID:22222092
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of sterile water injections (SWI) to relieve back pain in labour is supported by a number of randomised controlled trials. Although the procedure is available in a number of Australian maternity units, there is no information regarding the use of SWI by midwives, in terms of knowledge and availability, clinical application or technique used. Neither is there any data on midwives who do not use SWI nor the specific challengers and barriers encountered by midwives introducing SWI.

METHOD

An invitation to participate in an online survey was emailed to 4700 members of the Australian College of Midwives (ACM) and 484 members of CRANAplus (Remote Health Organisation). Nine hundred and seventy midwives completed the survey (19%).

RESULTS

Four hundred and seven (42.5%) midwives currently used SWI in their practice and five hundred and fifty-one (57.5%) indicated they did not. Eighty-six percent (n=478/548) indicated they would consider using SWI and 90% (n=500/547) were interested in obtaining further information about SWI. The main reasons cited for not using SWI was the lack of a policy or guideline (n=271, 57.5%) and being unable to access workshops or resource material (n=68, 14.4%).

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that SWI is not being used by the majority of midwives participating in the study, although there is a strong desire by midwives to learn about and explore its use. Greater access to information and workshops on SWI is highlighted. In response to the findings of this survey the authors are currently developing an online resource and training to support units to introduce SWI.

摘要

背景

多项随机对照试验支持无菌水注射(SWI)缓解分娩背痛的有效性。尽管该程序在澳大利亚的一些产科单位都有提供,但对于助产士在知识和可用性、临床应用或使用的技术方面使用 SWI 的情况,没有任何信息。也没有关于不使用 SWI 的助产士的数据,也没有关于引入 SWI 的助产士遇到的具体挑战和障碍的数据。

方法

向澳大利亚助产士学院(ACM)的 4700 名成员和 CRANAplus(远程健康组织)的 484 名成员发送了参加在线调查的邀请。970 名助产士完成了调查(19%)。

结果

407 名(42.5%)助产士目前在实践中使用 SWI,而 551 名(57.5%)表示他们没有。86%(n=478/548)表示他们会考虑使用 SWI,90%(n=500/547)表示有兴趣获得更多关于 SWI 的信息。不使用 SWI 的主要原因是缺乏政策或指南(n=271,57.5%)和无法获得讲习班或资源材料(n=68,14.4%)。

结论

本研究表明,大多数参与研究的助产士并未使用 SWI,但助产士强烈希望了解并探索其使用。更多地获得有关 SWI 的信息和讲习班被强调。针对这项调查的结果,作者目前正在开发一个在线资源和培训,以支持单位引入 SWI。

相似文献

1
Cross sectional study of Australian midwives knowledge and use of sterile water injections for pain relief in labour.澳大利亚助产士在分娩中使用无菌水注射减轻疼痛的知识和使用情况的横断面研究。
Women Birth. 2012 Dec;25(4):e74-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2011.11.002. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
2
US midwives' knowledge and use of sterile water injections for labor pain.美国助产士对分娩疼痛使用无菌水注射的知识与应用情况。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2008 Mar-Apr;53(2):115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2007.09.008.
3
Knowledge and use of sterile water injections amongst midwives in the United Kingdom: A cross-sectional study.英国助产士对无菌水注射的知识掌握与使用情况:一项横断面研究。
Midwifery. 2019 Jan;68:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
4
'Tough love': The experiences of midwives giving women sterile water injections for the relief of back pain in labour.“严厉的爱”:助产士为分娩时背痛的女性注射无菌水的经历。
Midwifery. 2017 Oct;53:80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Jul 22.
5
Use of acupuncture and sterile water injection for labor pain: a survey in Sweden.针刺疗法和注射无菌水用于分娩镇痛:瑞典的一项调查
Birth. 2006 Dec;33(4):289-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00121.x.
6
"No pain, no gain": The experience of women using sterile water injections.“一分耕耘,一分收获”:女性使用无菌水注射的经历。
Women Birth. 2017 Apr;30(2):153-158. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
7
'Facing the wrong way': Exploring the Occipito Posterior position/back pain discourse from women's and midwives perspectives.“胎位不正”:从女性和助产士的角度探讨枕后位/背痛话题
Midwifery. 2015 Oct;31(10):1008-14. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
8
'Soothing the ring of fire': Australian women's and midwives' experiences of using perineal warm packs in the second stage of labour.“缓解分娩剧痛”:澳大利亚女性和助产士在第二产程中使用会阴热敷袋的经历
Midwifery. 2009 Apr;25(2):e39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.08.002. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
9
How effectively do midwives manage the care of obese pregnant women? A cross-sectional survey of Australian midwives.澳大利亚助产士如何有效地管理肥胖孕妇的护理?一项横断面调查。
Women Birth. 2013 Jun;26(2):119-24. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
10
A randomised non-inferiority controlled trial of a single versus a four intradermal sterile water injection technique for relief of continuous lower back pain during labour.一项随机非劣效对照试验,比较单次与四次皮内无菌水注射技术缓解分娩期间持续下腰痛的效果。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Mar 23;11:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-21.

引用本文的文献

1
The barriers to offering non-pharmacological pain management as an initial option for laboring women: A review of the literature.将非药物性疼痛管理作为分娩女性的初始选择所面临的障碍:文献综述
Eur J Midwifery. 2022 Jun 10;6:37. doi: 10.18332/ejm/149244. eCollection 2022.
2
Effectiveness of injecting lower dose subcutaneous sterile water versus saline to relief labor back pain: Randomized controlled trial.注射低剂量皮下无菌水与生理盐水缓解分娩背痛的效果:随机对照试验。
Eur J Midwifery. 2018 Mar 14;2:3. doi: 10.18332/ejm/85793. eCollection 2018.
3
Caesarean delivery rates and analgesia effectiveness following injections of sterile water for back pain in labour: A multicentre, randomised placebo controlled trial.
分娩时注射无菌水治疗背痛后的剖宫产率及镇痛效果:一项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照试验
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jul 3;25:100447. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100447. eCollection 2020 Aug.
4
Knowledge, and use of labour pain relief methods and associated factors among obstetric caregivers at public health centers of East Gojjam zone, Amhara region, Ethiopia: a facility based cross- sectional study.东戈贾姆地区阿姆哈拉地区公共卫生中心产科护理人员对分娩镇痛方法的认知、使用情况及其影响因素:一项基于机构的横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Mar 23;20(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2844-z.
5
Impact on caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (ICARIS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.注射无菌水(ICARIS)对剖宫产率的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 May 3;13:105. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-105.