• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Why do single event probabilities confuse patients?

作者信息

Gigerenzer Gerd, Galesic Mirta

机构信息

Centre for Adaptive Behaviour and Cognition, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin.

出版信息

BMJ. 2012 Jan 11;344:e245. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e245.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.e245
PMID:22236599
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Why do single event probabilities confuse patients?为什么单事件概率会让患者感到困惑？
BMJ. 2012 Jan 11;344:e245. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e245.
2
Probability information in risk communication: a review of the research literature.风险沟通中的概率信息：研究文献综述
Risk Anal. 2009 Feb;29(2):267-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01137.x. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
3
Why patients complain and what health professionals can do about it.
Strateg Healthc Excell. 2000 Apr;13(4):11-2.
4
[Communicating risk--a matter of chance?].[沟通风险——关乎机遇？]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2007 Jun 11;169(24):2325-8.
5
Improving patient care and reducing risk through effective communication.
Health Law Can. 1997 Aug;18(1):30-2.
6
What I'm doing and why.
Emerg Med Serv. 2003 Mar;32(3):103.
7
Personal experience in doctor and patient decision making: from psychology to medicine.医生与患者决策中的个人经验：从心理学到医学。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Dec;15(6):993-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01350.x.
8
The illusion of the therapist's power and the patient's fragility: my rejoinder.
Ethics Behav. 1994;4(3):299-306. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0403_17.
9
Communication between patients, nurses, physicians and surgeons.
Hosp Top. 1977 Mar-Apr;55(2):6-7. doi: 10.1080/00185868.1977.9950379.
10
Speaking up for our patients, and ourselves.
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2011;30(4):1-2. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.20062.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Implementation of the Dutch Breast Cancer Surveillance Decision Aid including Personalized Risk Estimates in the SHOUT-BC Study: A Mixed Methods Approach.在SHOUT-BC研究中对荷兰乳腺癌监测决策辅助工具（包括个性化风险评估）实施情况的评估：一种混合方法研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 31;16(7):1390. doi: 10.3390/cancers16071390.
2
Ambiguity and unintended inferences about risk messages for COVID-19.关于 COVID-19 风险信息的歧义与意外推断。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2022 Sep;28(3):486-508. doi: 10.1037/xap0000416. Epub 2022 May 19.
3
Patient Utilization of Online Information and its Influence on Orthopedic Surgeon Selection: Cross-sectional Survey of Patient Beliefs and Behaviors.
患者对在线信息的利用及其对骨科医生选择的影响：患者信念与行为的横断面调查
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jan 19;6(1):e22586. doi: 10.2196/22586.
4
Qualitative Evaluation of a Novel Educational Tool to Communicate Individualized Hip Fracture Prognostic Information to Patients and Surrogates: My Hip Fracture (My-HF).一种向患者及代理人传达个体化髋部骨折预后信息的新型教育工具——“我的髋部骨折（My-HF）”的定性评估
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2021 Oct 23;12:21514593211050513. doi: 10.1177/21514593211050513. eCollection 2021.
5
A qualitative exploration of clinicians' strategies to communicate risks to patients in the complex reality of clinical practice.对临床医生在复杂临床实践现实中向患者传达风险的策略进行定性探索。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0236751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236751. eCollection 2020.
6
Benefits and harms of selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) to reduce breast cancer risk: a cross-sectional study of methods to communicate risk in primary care.选择性雌激素受体调节剂（SERMs）降低乳腺癌风险的获益与危害：初级保健中沟通风险方法的横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Nov 28;69(689):e836-e842. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X706841. Print 2019 Dec.
7
"The median isn't the message": How to communicate the uncertainties of survival prognoses to cancer patients in a realistic and hopeful way.“中位数不是关键”：如何以现实和有希望的方式向癌症患者传达生存预后的不确定性。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Jul;28(4):e13056. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13056. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
8
Exploring the perspectives and preferences for HTA across German healthcare stakeholders using a multi-criteria assessment of a pulmonary heart sensor as a case study.以肺动脉心脏传感器的多标准评估为例，探索德国医疗保健利益相关者对卫生技术评估的看法和偏好。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Apr 28;13:24. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0011-1.
9
Breast cancer specialists' views on and use of risk prediction models in clinical practice: a mixed methods approach.乳腺癌专家对风险预测模型在临床实践中的看法及应用：一种混合方法研究
Acta Oncol. 2015 Mar;54(3):361-7. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.964810. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
10
Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers.呈现决策结果的定量信息：为患者决策辅助工具开发者提供风险沟通基础
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S7. Epub 2013 Nov 29.