• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种预测模型可识别出最有可能因结肠镜检查而肠道准备不足的患者。

A predictive model identifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

机构信息

Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Irccs, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 May;10(5):501-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.12.037. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2011.12.037
PMID:22239959
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: An inadequate level of bowel preparation can affect the efficacy and safety of colonoscopy. Although some factors have been associated with outcome, there is no strategy to identify patients at high risk for inadequate preparation. We searched for factors associated with an inadequate level of preparation and tested the validity of a predictive clinical rule based on these factors.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study of 2811 consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy examinations at 18 medical centers; clinical and demographic data were collected before the colonoscopy. Bowel preparation was classified as adequate or inadequate; 925 patients (33%) were found to have inadequate preparation. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with inadequate preparation, which were expressed as odds ratio (OR) and used to build a predictive model.

RESULTS

Factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation included being overweight (OR, 1.5), male sex (OR, 1.2), a high body mass index (OR, 1.1), older age (OR, 1.01), previous colorectal surgery (OR, 1.6), cirrhosis (OR, 5), Parkinson disease (OR, 3.2), diabetes (OR, 1.8), and positive results in a fecal occult test (OR, 0.6). These factors predicted which patients would have inadequate cleansing with 60% sensitivity, 59% specificity, 41% positive predictive value, and 76% negative predictive value; they had an under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.63. Assuming 100% efficacy of a hypothetical regimen to address patients predicted to be at risk of inadequate preparation, the rate would decrease from 33% to 13%.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy and used these to build an accurate predictive model.

摘要

背景与目的

肠道准备不充分会影响结肠镜检查的效果和安全性。虽然一些因素与结果相关,但目前尚无确定肠道准备不充分高危患者的策略。我们寻找与肠道准备不充分相关的因素,并基于这些因素验证预测性临床规则的有效性。

方法

我们对在 18 家医疗中心进行结肠镜检查的 2811 例连续患者进行了前瞻性研究;在结肠镜检查前收集了临床和人口统计学数据。肠道准备分为充分和不充分;925 例(33%)患者肠道准备不充分。采用多变量分析确定与肠道准备不充分相关的因素,并用比值比(OR)表示,并用于构建预测模型。

结果

与肠道准备不充分相关的因素包括超重(OR,1.5)、男性(OR,1.2)、高体重指数(OR,1.1)、年龄较大(OR,1.01)、既往结直肠手术史(OR,1.6)、肝硬化(OR,5)、帕金森病(OR,3.2)、糖尿病(OR,1.8)和粪便潜血试验阳性(OR,0.6)。这些因素预测了哪些患者的肠道清洁效果不佳,其敏感性为 60%、特异性为 59%、阳性预测值为 41%、阴性预测值为 76%;它们在接受者操作特征曲线下的值为 0.63。假设一种针对预测为肠道准备不充分的高危患者的假设方案的疗效为 100%,则该方案的发生率将从 33%降至 13%。

结论

我们确定了与结肠镜肠道准备不充分相关的因素,并使用这些因素构建了一个准确的预测模型。

相似文献

1
A predictive model identifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy.一种预测模型可识别出最有可能因结肠镜检查而肠道准备不足的患者。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 May;10(5):501-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.12.037. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
2
Patient factors predictive of inadequate bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol: a prospective study in Korea.使用聚乙二醇肠道准备不充分的患者预测因素:韩国的一项前瞻性研究
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009 May-Jun;43(5):448-52. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181662442.
3
Usefulness of an intensive bowel cleansing strategy for repeat colonoscopy after preparation failure.强化肠道清洁策略在结肠镜检查失败后的重复应用。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Dec;54(12):1578-84. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823434c8.
4
Predicting inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in participants receiving split-dose bowel preparation: development and validation of a prediction score.预测接受分次肠道准备的参与者结肠镜检查肠道准备不足:预测评分的制定和验证。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):665-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.066. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
5
Patient factors predicting the completion of sedation-free colonoscopy.预测非镇静结肠镜检查完成情况的患者因素。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 Sep-Oct;55(86-87):1606-8.
6
Optimizing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: what are the predictors of an inadequate preparation?优化结肠镜检查的肠道准备:准备不充分的预测因素有哪些?
Am J Surg. 2015 May;209(5):787-92; discussion 792. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.12.018. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
7
Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查肠道准备不充分的预测因素。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Jun;96(6):1797-802. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03874.x.
8
High-dose senna compared with conventional PEG-ES lavage as bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial.大剂量番泻叶与传统聚乙二醇电解质溶液灌洗用于择期结肠镜检查肠道准备的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、研究者设盲试验
Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Dec;100(12):2674-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00335.x.
9
Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality.肠道准备完成至结肠镜检查开始之间的间隔时间可预测肠道准备质量。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):700-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.047.
10
Afternoon colonoscopies have higher failure rates than morning colonoscopies.下午进行的结肠镜检查比上午进行的结肠镜检查失败率更高。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Dec;101(12):2726-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00887.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a gut motility based model for predicting bowel preparation quality.一种基于肠道动力预测肠道准备质量模型的开发与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 2;15(1):28265. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13739-0.
2
Enhancing Patient Education for Colonoscopy Preparation: Strategies, Tools, and Best Practices.加强结肠镜检查准备的患者教育:策略、工具和最佳实践。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 19;14(12):4375. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124375.
3
Exploring intraprocedural performance in colonoscopy: Insights from a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.
探索结肠镜检查术中的操作表现:来自沙特阿拉伯一家三级医疗中心的见解。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2025 May 1;31(3):185-192. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_17_25. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
4
Applying machine learning to predict bowel preparation adequacy in elderly patients for colonoscopy: development and validation of a web-based prediction tool.应用机器学习预测老年患者结肠镜检查肠道准备的充分性:一种基于网络的预测工具的开发与验证
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2474172. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2474172. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
5
Derivation and validation of a prediction model for inadequate bowel preparation in Chinese outpatients.中国门诊患者肠道准备不充分预测模型的推导与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 9;15(1):1430. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85816-3.
6
One-day low-residue diet is equally effective as the multiple-day low-residue diet in achieving adequate bowel cleansing: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.一日低渣饮食在实现充分肠道清洁方面与多日低渣饮食同样有效:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Endosc. 2025 Jan;58(1):63-76. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.061. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
7
Incidence and predicting factors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy: A cross-sectional study.结肠镜检查肠道准备不充分的发生率及预测因素:一项横断面研究。
JGH Open. 2024 Aug 20;8(8):e13116. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.13116. eCollection 2024 Aug.
8
AN ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD PREDICTION MODEL TO IDENTIFY INADEQUATE BOWEL PREPARATION IN PATIENTS AT OUTPATIENT COLONOSCOPY.一种用于识别门诊结肠镜检查患者肠道准备不充分的电子病历预测模型。
Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc. 2024;26(2):130-137. doi: 10.1016/j.tige.2023.12.008. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
9
Development and validation of a novel scoring system based on a nomogram for predicting inadequate bowel preparation.基于列线图的预测不充分肠道准备新型评分系统的建立与验证。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Sep;26(9):2262-2273. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03443-2. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
10
Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulfate tablet versus 2 L-polyethylene glycol/ascorbate for bowel preparation in older patients: prospective, multicenter, investigator single-blinded, randomized study.口服硫酸盐片与 2 L 聚乙二醇/抗坏血酸在老年患者肠道准备中的疗效、耐受性和安全性:前瞻性、多中心、研究者单盲、随机研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2024 May;59(5):402-410. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02089-9. Epub 2024 Mar 16.