Suppr超能文献

乙二醇和有毒醇类摄入的回顾性分析:阴离子间隙和渗透压间隙的作用

A retrospective analysis of glycol and toxic alcohol ingestion: utility of anion and osmolal gaps.

作者信息

Krasowski Matthew D, Wilcoxon Rebecca M, Miron Joel

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.

出版信息

BMC Clin Pathol. 2012 Jan 12;12:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6890-12-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients ingesting ethylene glycol, isopropanol, methanol, and propylene glycol ('toxic alcohols') often present with non-specific signs and symptoms. Definitive diagnosis of toxic alcohols has traditionally been by gas chromatography (GC), a technique not commonly performed on-site in hospital clinical laboratories. The objectives of this retrospective study were: 1) to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the osmolal gap in screening for toxic alcohol ingestion and 2) to determine the common reasons other than toxic alcohol ingestion for elevated osmolal gaps.

METHODS

Electronic medical records from an academic tertiary care medical center were searched to identify all patients in the time period from January 1, 1996 to September 1, 2010 who had serum/plasma ethanol, glucose, sodium, blood urea nitrogen, and osmolality measured simultaneously, and also all patients who had GC analysis for toxic alcohols. Detailed chart review was performed on all patients with osmolal gap of 9 or greater.

RESULTS

In the study period, 20,669 patients had determination of serum/plasma ethanol and osmolal gap upon presentation to the hospitals. There were 341 patients with an osmolal gap greater than 14 (including correction for estimated contribution of ethanol) on initial presentation to the medical center. Seventy-seven patients tested positive by GC for one or more toxic alcohols; all had elevated anion gap or osmolal gap or both. Other than toxic alcohols, the most common causes for an elevated osmolal gap were recent heavy ethanol consumption with suspected alcoholic ketoacidosis, renal failure, shock, and recent administration of mannitol. Only 9 patients with osmolal gap greater than 50 and no patients with osmolal gap greater than 100 were found to be negative for toxic alcohols.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study concurs with other investigations that show that osmolal gap can be a useful diagnostic test in conjunction with clinical history and physical examination.

摘要

背景

摄入乙二醇、异丙醇、甲醇和丙二醇(“有毒醇类”)的患者通常表现出非特异性的体征和症状。传统上,有毒醇类的确诊是通过气相色谱法(GC),而该技术在医院临床实验室中并不常现场进行。这项回顾性研究的目的是:1)评估渗透压间隙在筛查有毒醇类摄入方面的诊断准确性,以及2)确定除有毒醇类摄入外导致渗透压间隙升高的常见原因。

方法

检索一家学术性三级医疗中心的电子病历,以识别1996年1月1日至2010年9月1日期间同时测量血清/血浆乙醇、葡萄糖、钠、血尿素氮和渗透压的所有患者,以及所有进行了有毒醇类GC分析的患者。对所有渗透压间隙为9或更高的患者进行详细的病历审查。

结果

在研究期间,20669名患者在入院时测定了血清/血浆乙醇和渗透压间隙。有341名患者在初次就诊于医疗中心时渗透压间隙大于14(包括对乙醇估计贡献的校正)。77名患者GC检测一种或多种有毒醇类呈阳性;所有患者阴离子间隙或渗透压间隙或两者均升高。除有毒醇类外,渗透压间隙升高的最常见原因是近期大量饮酒伴疑似酒精性酮症酸中毒、肾衰竭、休克以及近期使用甘露醇。仅发现9名渗透压间隙大于50的患者和无渗透压间隙大于100的患者有毒醇类检测为阴性。

结论

我们的研究与其他调查一致,表明渗透压间隙结合临床病史和体格检查可能是一项有用的诊断测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3917/3281782/066caf4188b0/1472-6890-12-1-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验