Suppr超能文献

比较测量和计算的渗透压水平。

Comparison of measured and calculated osmolality levels.

机构信息

Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, 26480, Odunpazarı, Eskişehir, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Exp Nephrol. 2020 May;24(5):444-449. doi: 10.1007/s10157-020-01848-1. Epub 2020 Jan 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Serum osmolality levels are measured to determine acid-base and electrolyte imbalance in serum. In cases where measurement is not possible, the serum osmolality value can be calculated by various calculation methods. In this study, we compared the Worthley osmolality calculation method which is used most frequently mentioned in literature and the measurements made with vapor pressure osmometer used in our laboratory. We compared whether there was a difference between the results obtained by measurement and calculation method in different age groups.

METHODS

221 serum samples of patients who were admitted to the Eskişehir Osmangazi University Hospital Biochemistry Laboratory between December 2016 and May 2018 were included in this study. Glucose, blood urea nitrogen and sodium values were recorded to determine the calculated osmolality values of the patients.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference between the measured osmolality values and the calculated osmolality values of the patients (p < 0.001). When compared according to age groups, there was a significant difference between calculated osmolality values (p = 0.006), but there was no difference in measured osmolality values (p = 0.787) in different age groups. It has been observed that this difference in the calculated osmolality values between the age groups is derived from the adult group (18-65, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that it is not reliable to calculate serum osmolality values, especially in the adult age group. According to our results the calculated osmolality values are higher than our measured osmolality values.

摘要

背景

血清渗透压水平的测量用于确定血清中的酸碱和电解质失衡。在无法测量的情况下,可以通过各种计算方法计算血清渗透压值。在这项研究中,我们比较了文献中最常提到的 Worthley 渗透压计算方法和我们实验室使用的蒸汽压渗透压计的测量值。我们比较了不同年龄组的测量值和计算值之间是否存在差异。

方法

本研究纳入了 2016 年 12 月至 2018 年 5 月期间在埃斯基谢希尔奥斯曼加济大学医院生物化学实验室就诊的 221 例患者的血清样本。记录葡萄糖、血尿素氮和钠值,以确定患者的计算渗透压值。

结果

患者的测量渗透压值和计算渗透压值之间存在统计学显著差异(p<0.001)。按年龄组比较时,计算渗透压值存在显著差异(p=0.006),但不同年龄组的测量渗透压值无差异(p=0.787)。观察到这种计算渗透压值在年龄组之间的差异来自成年组(18-65 岁,p<0.001)。

结论

我们的结果表明,计算血清渗透压值不可靠,特别是在成年年龄组。根据我们的结果,计算渗透压值高于我们的测量渗透压值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验