• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善验证性因子分析中模型拟合度的评估:对 Gundy, C.M., Fayers, P.M., Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. Aa., Scott, N.W., Sprangers, M.A.J., Velikov, G., Aaronson, N.K.(2011)的评论。比较 EORTC QLQ-C30 的高阶模型。生活质量研究,doi:10.1007/s11136-011-0082-6。

Improving the evaluation of model fit in confirmatory factor analysis: A commentary on Gundy, C.M., Fayers, P.M., Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. Aa., Scott, N.W., Sprangers, M.A.J., Velikov, G., Aaronson, N.K. (2011). Comparing higher-order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of life research, doi:10.1007/s11136-011-0082-6.

机构信息

National Crime Prevention Centre, Public Safety Canada, 269 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0P8, Canada.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2012 Nov;21(9):1619-21; discussion 1623-4. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0084-4. Epub 2012 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-011-0084-4
PMID:22249309
Abstract

This article is a brief commentary in response to "Gundy, C.M., Fayers, P.M., Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. Aa., Scott, N.W., Sprangers, M.A.J., Velikov, G., Aaronson, N.K. (2011). Comparing higher-order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of life research, doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0082-6 ." The commentary argues that approximate goodness-of-fit indexes cannot be used to salvage confirmatory factor models rejected by the Chi-square test of exact fit. Instead, rigorous diagnostic procedures should be used to identify and resolve the particular sources of model misspecification.

摘要

这是一篇针对“Gundy, C.M., Fayers, P.M., Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. Aa., Scott, N.W., Sprangers, M.A.J., Velikov, G., Aaronson, N.K. (2011). Comparing higher-order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of life research, doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0082-6.”的简要评论。该评论认为,近似拟合优度指数不能用于挽救被精确拟合卡方检验拒绝的验证性因子模型。相反,应该使用严格的诊断程序来识别和解决模型不拟合的特定原因。

相似文献

1
Improving the evaluation of model fit in confirmatory factor analysis: A commentary on Gundy, C.M., Fayers, P.M., Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. Aa., Scott, N.W., Sprangers, M.A.J., Velikov, G., Aaronson, N.K. (2011). Comparing higher-order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of life research, doi:10.1007/s11136-011-0082-6.改善验证性因子分析中模型拟合度的评估:对 Gundy, C.M., Fayers, P.M., Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. Aa., Scott, N.W., Sprangers, M.A.J., Velikov, G., Aaronson, N.K.(2011)的评论。比较 EORTC QLQ-C30 的高阶模型。生活质量研究,doi:10.1007/s11136-011-0082-6。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Nov;21(9):1619-21; discussion 1623-4. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0084-4. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
2
Comparing higher order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30.比较 EORTC QLQ-C30 的高阶模型。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Nov;21(9):1607-17. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0082-6. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
3
Underlying dimensions of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in a Cuban population of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.古巴晚期非小细胞肺癌患者 EORTC QLQ-C30 问卷的潜在维度。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Dec;29(12):3441-3448. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02584-5. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
4
Updated EORTC QLQ-C30 general population norm data for Germany.更新的 EORTC QLQ-C30 一般人群规范数据(德国)。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Sep;137:161-170. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
5
Psychometric properties of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Uganda.《EORTC QLQ-C30 在乌干达的心理测量特性》。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Apr 23;19(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01769-x.
6
International validation of the EORTC CAT Core: a new adaptive instrument for measuring core quality of life domains in cancer.EORTC CAT 核心量表的国际验证:一种新的自适应工具,用于测量癌症患者核心生活质量领域。
Qual Life Res. 2020 May;29(5):1405-1417. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02421-9. Epub 2020 Jan 18.
7
Validating and improving the reliability of the EORTC qlq-c30 using a multidimensional Rasch model.采用多维 Rasch 模型验证和改进 EORTC qlq-c30 的可靠性。
Value Health. 2013 Jul-Aug;16(5):848-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
8
Consistency matters: measurement invariance of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire in patients with hematologic malignancies.一致性很重要:EORTC QLQ-C30 问卷在血液恶性肿瘤患者中的测量不变性。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Mar;29(3):815-823. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02369-5. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
9
International field testing of the psychometric properties of an EORTC quality of life module for oral health: the EORTC QLQ-OH15.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织口腔健康生活质量模块(EORTC QLQ-OH15)心理测量特性的国际现场测试
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Sep;24(9):3915-24. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3216-0. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
10
Mapping EORTC-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 onto EQ-5D-5L in Colorectal Cancer Patients.将欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心30项(EORTC-QLQ-C30)和结直肠癌29项问卷(QLQ-CR29)映射到结直肠癌患者的欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D-5L)
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2020 Mar;51(1):196-203. doi: 10.1007/s12029-019-00229-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the arterial puncture self-efficacy scale.动脉穿刺自我效能量表中文版的翻译与心理测量学评估
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 7;24(1):861. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03514-x.
2
Nurses' self-efficacy and outcome expectancy in evidence-based practice: Translation, construct validity and internal consistency of the Dutch scales.护士在循证实践中的自我效能感与结果期望:荷兰量表的翻译、结构效度及内部一致性
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Dec 26;8:100286. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100286. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Measuring electronic health literacy in the context of diabetes care: psychometric evaluation of a Persian version of the condition-specific eHealth literacy scale for diabetes.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comparison of Bifactor and Second-Order Models of Quality of Life.生活质量的双因素模型与二阶模型比较
Multivariate Behav Res. 2006 Jun 1;41(2):189-225. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4102_5.
2
Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: a comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches.多方面构念的一般和特定方差建模:二因素模型与其他方法的比较。
J Pers. 2012 Feb;80(1):219-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00739.x.
3
Using Instrumental Variable (IV) Tests to Evaluate Model Specification in Latent Variable Structural Equation Models.
在糖尿病护理背景下测量电子健康素养:糖尿病特定条件下电子健康素养量表的波斯语版本的心理计量学评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Jul 5;24(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02594-0.
4
Negative correlations of psychological distress with quality of life and immunotherapy efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC.晚期非小细胞肺癌患者心理困扰与生活质量及免疫治疗疗效的负相关
Am J Cancer Res. 2022 Feb 15;12(2):805-815. eCollection 2022.
5
Development and validation of a Malawian version of the primary care assessment tool.马拉维版初级保健评估工具的开发与验证
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 May 16;19(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0763-0.
6
Hand-related physical function in rheumatic hand conditions: a protocol for developing a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument.风湿性手部疾病中与手相关的身体功能:开发患者报告结局测量工具的方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 14;6(12):e011174. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011174.
7
Psychometric Properties of a Short Measure for Psychosocial Factors and Associations With Phase of Physical Activity Change Among Finnish Working-Aged Men.芬兰工作年龄男性心理社会因素简短测量工具的心理测量特性及其与身体活动变化阶段的关联
Am J Mens Health. 2017 Sep;11(5):1525-1535. doi: 10.1177/1557988315614615. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
8
A cautionary note on testing latent variable models.关于检验潜在变量模型的警示说明。
Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 6;6:1715. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01715. eCollection 2015.
9
Strengthening the assessment of factorial invariance across population subgroups: a commentary on Varni et al. (2013).增强对人群亚组因子不变性的评估:对 Varni 等人(2013 年)的评论。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Nov;22(9):2595-601. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0465-y. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
10
Factor analyses of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: a Bayesian structural equation modeling approach.医院焦虑和抑郁量表的因子分析:贝叶斯结构方程建模方法。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Dec;22(10):2857-63. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0429-2. Epub 2013 May 14.
使用工具变量(IV)检验评估潜在变量结构方程模型中的模型设定
Sociol Methodol. 2009 Jul 2;39(1):327-355. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2009.01217.x.