Richards Bethan L, Whittle Samuel L, Buchbinder Rachelle
Institute of Rheumatology and Orthopedics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown,
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD008922. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008922.pub2.
Pain management is a high priority for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Muscle relaxants include drugs that reduce muscle spasm (for example benzodiazepines such as diazepam (Valium), alprazolam (Xanax), lorazepam (Ativan) and non-benzodiazepines such as metaxalone (Skelaxin) or a combination of paracetamol and orphenadrine (Muscol)) and drugs that prevent increased muscle tone (baclofen and dantrolene). Despite a paucity of evidence supporting their use, antispasmodic and antispasticity muscle relaxants have gained widespread clinical acceptance as adjuvants in the management of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
The aim of this review was to determine the efficacy and safety of muscle relaxants in pain management in patients with RA. The muscle relaxants that were included in this review are the antispasmodic benzodiazepines (alprazolam, bromazepam, chlordiazepoxide,cinolazepam, clonazepam, cloxazolam, clorazepate, diazepam, estazolam, flunitrazepam, flurazepam, flutoprazepam, halazepam, ketazolam, loprazolam, lorazepam, lormetazepam, medazepam, midazolam, nimetazepam, nitrazepam, nordazepam, oxazepam, pinazepam, prazepam, quazepam, temazepam, tetrazepam, triazolam), antispasmodic non-benzodiazepines (cyclobenzaprine, carisoprodol, chlorzoxazone, meprobamate, methocarbamol, metaxalone, orphenadrine, tizanidine and zopiclone), and antispasticity drugs (baclofen and dantrolene sodium).
We performed a search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 4th quarter 2010), MEDLINE (1950 to week 1 November 2010), EMBASE (Week 44 2010), and PsycINFO (1806 to week 2 November 2010). We also searched the 2008 to 2009 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) abstracts and performed a handsearch of reference lists of relevant articles.
We included randomised controlled trials which compared a muscle relaxant to another therapy (active, including non-pharmacological therapies, or placebo) in adult patients with RA and that reported at least one clinically relevant outcome.
Two blinded review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the trials. Meta-analyses were used to examine the efficacy of muscle relaxants on pain, depression, sleep and function, as well as their safety.
Six trials (126 participants) were included in this review. All trials were rated at high risk of bias. Five cross-over trials evaluated a benzodiazepine, four assessed diazepam (n = 71) and one assessed triazolam (n = 15). The sixth trial assessed zopiclone (a non-benzodiazepine) (n = 40) and was a parallel group study. No trial duration was longer than two weeks while three single dose trials assessed outcomes at 24 hours only. Overall the included trials failed to find evidence of a beneficial effect of muscle relaxants over placebo, alone (at 24 hrs, 1 or 2 weeks) or in addition to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (at 24 hrs), on pain intensity, function, or quality of life. Data from two trials of longer than 24 hours duration (n = 74) (diazepam and zopiclone) found that participants who received a muscle relaxant had significantly more adverse events compared with those who received placebo (number needed to harm (NNTH) 3, 95% CI 2 to 7). These were predominantly central nervous system side effects, including dizziness and drowsiness (NNTH 3, 95% CI 2 to 11).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based upon the currently available evidence in patients with RA, benzodiazepines (diazepam and triazolam) do not appear to be beneficial in improving pain over 24 hours or one week. The non-benzodiazepine agent zopiclone also did not significantly reduce pain over two weeks. However, even short term muscle relaxant use (24 hours to 2 weeks) is associated with significant adverse events, predominantly drowsiness and dizziness.
疼痛管理是类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的首要任务。肌肉松弛剂包括可减轻肌肉痉挛的药物(如地西泮(安定)、阿普唑仑(佳静安定)、劳拉西泮(氯羟安定)等苯二氮䓬类药物以及美他沙酮(斯开乐)等非苯二氮䓬类药物或对乙酰氨基酚与奥芬那君的组合(肌可隆))以及可防止肌张力增加的药物(巴氯芬和丹曲林)。尽管支持其使用的证据不足,但解痉和抗痉挛性肌肉松弛剂作为慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者管理中的辅助药物已获得广泛的临床认可。
本综述的目的是确定肌肉松弛剂在RA患者疼痛管理中的疗效和安全性。本综述纳入的肌肉松弛剂包括解痉苯二氮䓬类药物(阿普唑仑、溴西泮、氯氮卓、西诺西泮、氯硝西泮、氯恶唑仑、氯氮䓬、地西泮、艾司唑仑、氟硝西泮、氟西泮、氟托西泮、哈拉西泮、凯他唑仑、洛拉唑仑、劳拉西泮、氯美扎酮、美达西泮、咪达唑仑、硝甲西泮、硝西泮、去甲西泮、奥沙西泮、匹那西泮、普拉西泮、夸西泮、替马西泮、四氢西泮、三唑仑)、解痉非苯二氮䓬类药物(环苯扎林、卡立普多、氯唑沙宗、甲丙氨酯、美索巴莫、美他沙酮、奥芬那君、替扎尼定和佐匹克隆)以及抗痉挛药物(巴氯芬和丹曲林钠)。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(《Cochrane图书馆》,2010年第4季度)、MEDLINE(1950年至2010年11月第1周)、EMBASE(2010年第44周)和PsycINFO(1806年至2010年11月第2周)。我们还检索了2008年至2009年美国风湿病学会(ACR)和欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)的摘要,并对相关文章的参考文献列表进行了手工检索。
我们纳入了将一种肌肉松弛剂与另一种疗法(活性疗法,包括非药物疗法或安慰剂)进行比较且报告了至少一项临床相关结局的成年RA患者随机对照试验。
两位盲法综述作者独立提取数据并评估试验中的偏倚风险。采用荟萃分析来检验肌肉松弛剂对疼痛、抑郁、睡眠和功能的疗效以及它们的安全性。
本综述纳入了6项试验(126名参与者)。所有试验的偏倚风险均被评为高。5项交叉试验评估了一种苯二氮䓬类药物,4项评估了地西泮(n = 71),1项评估了三唑仑(n = 15)。第6项试验评估了佐匹克隆(一种非苯二氮䓬类药物)(n = 40),是一项平行组研究。没有试验持续时间超过两周,而3项单剂量试验仅在24小时评估结局。总体而言,纳入的试验未能找到证据表明肌肉松弛剂在单独使用(24小时、1周或2周时)或与非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)联合使用(24小时时)对疼痛强度、功能或生活质量有优于安慰剂的有益效果。两项持续时间超过24小时(n = 74)(地西泮和佐匹克隆)的试验数据发现,接受肌肉松弛剂的参与者与接受安慰剂的参与者相比,不良事件显著更多(伤害所需人数(NNTH)为3,95%可信区间为2至7)。这些主要是中枢神经系统副作用,包括头晕和嗜睡(NNTH为3,95%可信区间为2至11)。
基于目前RA患者的现有证据,苯二氮䓬类药物(地西泮和三唑仑)在改善24小时或一周内的疼痛方面似乎并无益处。非苯二氮䓬类药物佐匹克隆在两周内也未显著减轻疼痛。然而,即使短期使用肌肉松弛剂(24小时至2周)也与显著的不良事件相关,主要是嗜睡和头晕。