Richards Bethan L, Whittle Samuel L, Buchbinder Rachelle
Institute of Rheumatology and Orthopedics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9(11):CD008920. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008920.pub2.
Pain management is a high priority for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Antidepressants are sometimes used as adjuvant agents to enhance pain relief, help with sleep and reduce depression. Such antidepressants include tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), selective serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (NRIs). However, the prescription of antidepressants in this population remains controversial because of conflicting scientific evidence.
The aim of this review was to determine the efficacy and safety of antidepressants in pain management in patients with RA.
We performed a computer assisted search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, 4th quarter); MEDLINE (1950 to November Week 1, 2010); EMBASE (2010 Week 44); and PsycINFO (1806 to November Week 2, 2010). We also searched the 2008-2009 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) abstracts and performed a handsearch of reference lists of articles.
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which compared an antidepressant therapy to another therapy (active or placebo, including non-pharmacological therapies) in adult patients with RA who had at least one clinically relevant outcome measure. Outcomes of interest were pain, adverse effects, function, sleep, depression and quality of life.
Two blinded review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the trials. We conducted meta-analyses to examine the efficacy of antidepressants on pain, depression and function, as well as their safety.
We included eight RCTs (652 participants) in this review. All trials evaluated TCAs and two trials evaluated a SSRI as a comparator. Seven of the eight trials had high risk of bias. There was insufficient data for a number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) to be calculated for the primary outcome measure of pain. The qualitative analyses found no evidence of an effect of antidepressants on pain intensity or depression in the short-term (less than one week), and conflicting evidence of a medium- (one to six weeks) or long-term (more than six weeks) benefit. There were significantly more minor adverse events in patients receiving TCAs compared with those receiving a placebo (risk ratio (RR) 2.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17 to 4.42), but there was no significant increase in withdrawals due to an adverse event (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.49 to 2.42).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently insufficient evidence to support the routine prescription of antidepressants as analgesics in patients with RA as no reliable conclusions about their efficacy can be drawn from eight placebo RCTs. The use of these agents may be associated with adverse events which are generally mild and do not lead to cessation of treatment. More high quality trials are needed in this area.
疼痛管理是类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者的一项重要任务。抗抑郁药有时用作辅助药物,以增强疼痛缓解效果、改善睡眠并减轻抑郁。这类抗抑郁药包括三环类抗抑郁药(TCA)、单胺氧化酶抑制剂(MAOI)、选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)、选择性5-羟色胺去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRI)和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(NRI)。然而,由于科学证据相互矛盾,该人群中抗抑郁药的处方仍存在争议。
本综述的目的是确定抗抑郁药在RA患者疼痛管理中的疗效和安全性。
我们利用计算机辅助检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(Cochrane图书馆2010年第4季度)、MEDLINE(1950年至2010年11月第1周)、EMBASE(2010年第44周)和PsycINFO(1806年至2010年11月第2周)。我们还检索了2008 - 2009年美国风湿病学会(ACR)和欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)的摘要,并对文章的参考文献列表进行了手工检索。
我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验比较了抗抑郁药治疗与另一种治疗(活性药物或安慰剂,包括非药物治疗)对至少有一项临床相关结局指标的成年RA患者的疗效。感兴趣的结局指标包括疼痛、不良反应、功能、睡眠、抑郁和生活质量。
两位盲法综述作者独立提取数据并评估试验中的偏倚风险。我们进行了荟萃分析,以检验抗抑郁药在疼痛、抑郁和功能方面的疗效及其安全性。
本综述纳入了8项RCT(652名参与者)。所有试验均评估了三环类抗抑郁药,两项试验评估了选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂作为对照。8项试验中的7项存在高偏倚风险。对于疼痛这一主要结局指标,没有足够的数据来计算获得额外有益结局所需的治疗人数(NNTB)。定性分析发现,没有证据表明抗抑郁药在短期(少于1周)对疼痛强度或抑郁有影响,对于中期(1至6周)或长期(超过6周)的益处,证据相互矛盾。与接受安慰剂的患者相比,接受三环类抗抑郁药的患者出现的轻微不良事件明显更多(风险比(RR)2.27,95%置信区间(CI)1.17至4.42),但因不良事件导致的退出率没有显著增加(RR 1.09,95% CI 0.49至2.42)。
目前没有足够的证据支持在RA患者中将抗抑郁药作为镇痛药常规处方,因为从8项安慰剂RCT中无法得出关于其疗效的可靠结论。使用这些药物可能会出现不良事件,这些事件通常较轻,不会导致治疗中断。该领域需要更多高质量的试验。