Suppr超能文献

人工关节感染清创后保留治疗的成本分析。

Cost analysis of debridement and retention for management of prosthetic joint infection.

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Vic., Australia.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013 Feb;19(2):181-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03758.x. Epub 2012 Jan 20.

Abstract

Prosthetic joint infection remains one of the most devastating complications of arthroplasty. Debridement and retention of the prosthesis is an attractive management option in carefully selected patients. Despite this, there are no data investigating the cost of this management modality for prosthetic joint infections. The aim of this case-control study was to calculate the cost associated with debridement and retention for management of prosthetic joint infection compared with primary joint replacement surgery without prosthetic joint infection. From 1 January 2008 to 30 June 2010, there were 21 prosthetic joint infections matched to 42 control patients. Controls were matched to cases according to the arthroplasty site, age and sex. Cases had a greater number of unplanned readmissions (100% vs. 7.1%; p <0.001), more additional surgery (3.3 vs. 0.07; p <0.001) and longer total bed days (31.6 vs. 7.9 days; p <0.001). In addition they had more inpatient, outpatient and emergency department visits (p <0.001, respectively). For patients with prosthetic joint infection the total cost, including index operation and costs of management of the prosthetic joint infection, was 3.1 times the cost of primary arthoplasty; the mean cost for cases was Australian dollars (AUD) $69,414 (±29,869) compared with $22,085 (±8147) (p <0.001). The demand for arthroplasty continues to grow and with that, the number of prosthetic joint infections will also increase, placing significant burden on the health system. Our study adds significantly to the growing body of evidence highlighting the substantial costs associated with prosthetic joint infection.

摘要

人工关节感染仍然是关节置换术最严重的并发症之一。在精心挑选的患者中,保留假体的清创术是一种有吸引力的治疗选择。尽管如此,目前尚无关于这种人工关节感染治疗方式的成本数据。本病例对照研究的目的是计算与初次关节置换术相比,保留假体清创术治疗人工关节感染的相关成本,而初次关节置换术无人工关节感染。从 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2010 年 6 月 30 日,有 21 例人工关节感染与 42 例对照患者相匹配。对照组根据关节置换部位、年龄和性别与病例相匹配。病例组有更多的非计划再入院(100%比 7.1%;p<0.001)、更多的额外手术(3.3 比 0.07;p<0.001)和更长的总住院天数(31.6 比 7.9 天;p<0.001)。此外,他们的住院、门诊和急诊就诊次数也更多(分别为 p<0.001)。对于人工关节感染患者,包括索引手术和人工关节感染治疗费用在内的总费用是初次关节成形术的 3.1 倍;病例组的平均费用为澳元(AUD)69414 美元(±29869),而初次关节成形术的平均费用为 22085 美元(±8147)(p<0.001)。人工关节置换术的需求继续增长,随之而来的是人工关节感染的数量也会增加,这给卫生系统带来了巨大的负担。我们的研究大大增加了越来越多的证据,突出了与人工关节感染相关的巨大成本。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验