Suppr超能文献

副溶血性弧菌和创伤弧菌的分子检测方法比较。

Comparison of molecular detection methods for Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus.

机构信息

Gulf Coast Seafood Laboratory, Division of Seafood Science and Technology, FDA, 1 Iberville Drive, Dauphin Island, AL 36528, USA.

出版信息

Food Microbiol. 2012 May;30(1):105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2011.12.011. Epub 2011 Dec 16.

Abstract

Pathogenic vibrios are a global concern for seafood safety and many molecular methods have been developed for their detection. This study compares several molecular methods for detection of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus, in MPN enrichments from oysters and fish intestine samples. This study employed the DuPont Qualicon BAX® System Real-Time PCR assay for detection of V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus. Multiplex real-time PCR detection of total (tlh+), tdh+, and trh+V. parahaemolyticus was conducted on the Cepheid SmartCycler II. Total (rpoD) and tdh+V. parahaemolyticus were also detected using LAMP. V. vulnificus detection was performed using real-time PCR methods developed for the SmartCycler and the AB 7500 Fast. Recommended template preparations were compared to BAX® lysis samples for suitability. There was no significant difference in detection of V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus using the BAX® or SmartCycler assays. The AB assay showed no difference from other methods in detection of V. vulnificus unless boiled templates were utilized. There was a significant difference in detection of tdh+V. parahaemolyticus between SmartCycler and LAMP assays unless the total (tlh+) V. parahaemolyticus gene target was omitted from the SmartCycler assay; a similar trend was observed for trh+V. parahaemolyticus.

摘要

致病性弧菌对海产品安全构成了全球性威胁,因此已经开发出许多分子方法来检测它们。本研究比较了几种分子方法,用于检测贝类和鱼类肠道样品中总致病性副溶血性弧菌和创伤弧菌的 MPN 富集物。本研究采用杜邦 Qualicon BAX®系统实时 PCR 法检测副溶血性弧菌和创伤弧菌。采用 Cepheid SmartCycler II 进行总(tlh+)、tdh+和 trh+副溶血性弧菌的多重实时 PCR 检测。使用 LAMP 检测总(rpoD)和 tdh+副溶血性弧菌。采用为 SmartCycler 和 AB 7500 Fast 开发的实时 PCR 方法检测创伤弧菌。比较了推荐的模板制备方法与 BAX®裂解样品的适用性。使用 BAX®或 SmartCycler 检测副溶血性弧菌和创伤弧菌时,没有显著差异。AB 检测方法与其他方法在检测创伤弧菌时没有差异,除非使用煮沸的模板。SmartCycler 和 LAMP 检测 tdh+副溶血性弧菌时存在显著差异,除非 SmartCycler 检测方法中省略了总(tlh+)副溶血性弧菌基因靶标;在 trh+副溶血性弧菌中也观察到类似的趋势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验