Theile G, Winter A, Hummers-Pradier E, Junius-Walker U
Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str 1, 30625 Hannover.
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 Jun;45(4):323-30. doi: 10.1007/s00391-011-0265-3.
Aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance and use of a basic geriatric assessment (BGA), as it is covered by the German pay system, in primary care practices.
We conducted qualitative interviews and collected quantitative data by an online questionnaire.
A total of 17 (10 men) general practitioners (GPs) agreed to be interviewed; 161 patients (134 men) completed the online questionnaire. GPs mainly performed BGA to substantiate the suspicion of cognitive impairment. Most of the German general practices accomplished not more than 5-10 BGA per quarter. Although those GPs who conducted BGA were convinced of its usefulness with regard to further patient care, concrete interventions were rarely named. The tests used within the BGA were not always in line with recommendations from the specific guidelines. The main reasons not to conduct BGA were the amount of time required and the lack of therapeutic consequences.
Hitherto BGA is not an established tool in German primary care practices. The question, which single instruments are most suitable for older general practice patients, still needs clarification.
本研究旨在评估德国医保体系覆盖的基本老年医学评估(BGA)在基层医疗实践中的接受度和使用情况。
我们进行了定性访谈,并通过在线问卷收集定量数据。
共有17名(10名男性)全科医生(GP)同意接受访谈;161名患者(134名男性)完成了在线问卷。全科医生主要进行BGA以证实对认知障碍的怀疑。大多数德国基层医疗实践机构每季度完成的BGA不超过5 - 10次。尽管进行BGA的全科医生确信其对进一步的患者护理有用,但很少提及具体的干预措施。BGA中使用的测试并不总是符合特定指南的建议。不进行BGA的主要原因是所需时间和缺乏治疗效果。
迄今为止,BGA在德国基层医疗实践中并非既定工具。哪种单一工具最适合老年基层医疗患者的问题仍需澄清。