Curtis Laura M, Wolf Michael S, Weiss Kevin B, Grammer Leslie C
Health Literacy and Learning Program, Division of General Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
J Asthma. 2012 Mar;49(2):178-83. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2011.648297. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
Racial/ethnic disparities have been well documented in asthma. While socioeconomic status (SES) has been repeatedly implicated as a root cause, the role of limited health literacy has not been extensively studied. The purpose of this study was to examine the independent contributions of SES and health literacy in explaining asthma disparities.
A cohort study was conducted in a Chicago-based sample of 353 adults aged 18-40 years with persistent asthma from 2004 to 2007. Health literacy, SES, and asthma outcomes including disease control, quality of life, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations were assessed in person at baseline, and asthma outcomes were measured every 3 months for 2 years by phone. Multivariate models were used to assess racial/ethnic disparities in asthma outcomes and the effect of health literacy and SES on these estimates.
Compared with White participants, African American adults fared significantly worse in all asthma outcomes (p < .05) and Latino participants had lower quality of life (β = -0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.79, -0.14; p = .01) and worse asthma control (risk ratio [RR] = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.41, 0.98; p = .04). Differences in SES partially explained these disparities. Health literacy explained an additional 20.2% of differences in quality of life between Latinos and Whites, but differences in hospitalization rates between African American and White adults remained (RR = 2.97; 95% CI = 1.09, 8.12, p = .03).
Health literacy appears to be an overlooked factor explaining racial and ethnic disparities in asthma. Evidence-based low literacy strategies for patient education and counseling should be included in comprehensive interventions.
种族/民族差异在哮喘中已有充分记录。虽然社会经济地位(SES)一再被认为是根本原因,但健康素养有限的作用尚未得到广泛研究。本研究的目的是检验SES和健康素养在解释哮喘差异方面的独立作用。
2004年至2007年,在芝加哥对353名年龄在18 - 40岁、患有持续性哮喘的成年人进行了一项队列研究。在基线时亲自评估健康素养、SES和哮喘结局,包括疾病控制、生活质量、急诊就诊和住院情况,并通过电话在2年时间里每3个月测量一次哮喘结局。使用多变量模型评估哮喘结局中的种族/民族差异以及健康素养和SES对这些估计值的影响。
与白人参与者相比,非裔美国成年人在所有哮喘结局方面明显更差(p < 0.05),拉丁裔参与者的生活质量较低(β = -0.47;95%置信区间[CI] = -0.79,-0.14;p = 0.01),哮喘控制更差(风险比[RR] = 0.63;95% CI = 0.41,0.98;p = 0.04)。SES的差异部分解释了这些差异。健康素养又解释了拉丁裔和白人之间生活质量差异的20.2%,但非裔美国成年人与白人成年人之间的住院率差异仍然存在(RR = 2.97;95% CI = 1.09,8.12,p = 0.03)。
健康素养似乎是解释哮喘种族和民族差异的一个被忽视的因素。基于证据的低素养患者教育和咨询策略应纳入综合干预措施中。