Department of Emergency Medicine, Brown University; and Medical Simulation Center, Rhode Island Hospital, Suite 106, Coro West Bldg, 1 Hoppin St, Providence, RI 02903, USA.
Simul Healthc. 2012 Apr;7(2):81-94. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31823b9923.
Emergency department procedural sedation (EDPS) is becoming widespread. Simulation may enhance patient safety through evidence-based training, effective assessment, and research of EDPS operators in pertinent knowledge, skills, processes, and teamwork.
Investigators developed a 2-scenario in situ simulation-based methodology and research tool kit for objective examination of EDPS practice. The emphasis was on protocol-driven presedation preparation, intrasedation vigilance and readiness for adverse events, and postsedation reassessment. Pilot sessions were conducted to test the methodology at an academic 719-bed hospital, with Institutional Review Board approval.
Five interns and 5 attending emergency physicians completed pilot sessions resulting in protocol revisions to optimize simulation consistency, research tool sets, data acquisition, and operational conditions. Pilot data sets demonstrated interscenario consistency and intersubject reproducibility for timing, progression, and duration of critical EDPS events; high levels of perceived realism and relevance; and utility and suggested validity of the study methodology as an EDPS research mechanism. Small sample sizes limited the study methodology's ability to distinguish between the subject groups' clinical performances (critical action completion, probe detection, and situational awareness) except with composite scoring of presedation and postsedation assessments. Key EDPS preparation, adverse event management, and reassessment actions were selected to derive a Simulation EDPS Safety Composite Score that differentiated inexperienced [4.60 ± 0.8 on a 10-point score (n = 3)] and experienced EDPS operators [8.95 ± 1.03 (n = 5); P = 0.0007].
In situ simulation is a useful and relevant means to investigate EDPS patient safety. Pilot sessions have cleared the way for further experimental safety intervention research and development with the simulation-based methodology.
急诊程序镇静(EDPS)正在广泛应用。通过基于证据的培训、对 EDPS 操作人员相关知识、技能、流程和团队合作的有效评估以及研究,模拟可以提高患者安全性。
研究人员开发了一种基于 2 个情景的现场模拟方法和研究工具包,用于客观检查 EDPS 实践。重点是协议驱动的预镇静准备、镇静期间的警惕性和对不良事件的准备以及镇静后评估。在获得机构审查委员会批准的情况下,在一所拥有 719 张床位的学术医院进行了试点课程,以测试该方法。
五名住院医师和五名主治急诊医师完成了试点课程,从而对协议进行了修订,以优化模拟一致性、研究工具集、数据采集和操作条件。试点数据集证明了关键 EDPS 事件的时间、进展和持续时间的情景一致性和受试者间可重复性;高水平的感知真实性和相关性;以及该研究方法作为 EDPS 研究机制的实用性和有效性。由于样本量小,研究方法除了对预镇静和镇静后评估进行综合评分外,无法区分受试者组的临床表现(关键操作完成、探针检测和情境意识)。选择了关键的 EDPS 准备、不良事件管理和重新评估操作,以得出区分经验不足的 EDPS 操作人员[10 分制下 4.60 ± 0.8(n = 3)]和经验丰富的 EDPS 操作人员[8.95 ± 1.03(n = 5);P = 0.0007]的模拟 EDPS 安全综合评分。
现场模拟是一种调查 EDPS 患者安全性的有用且相关的方法。试点课程为使用基于模拟的方法进行进一步的实验性安全干预研究和开发铺平了道路。