Australian Infectious Diseases Research Centre, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Apr;78(7):2179-89. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06680-11. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
Trimeric autotransporter proteins (TAAs) are important virulence factors of many Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. A common feature of most TAAs is the ability to mediate adherence to eukaryotic cells or extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins via a cell surface-exposed passenger domain. Here we describe the characterization of EhaG, a TAA identified from enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) O157:H7. EhaG is a positional orthologue of the recently characterized UpaG TAA from uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC). Similarly to UpaG, EhaG localized at the bacterial cell surface and promoted cell aggregation, biofilm formation, and adherence to a range of ECM proteins. However, the two orthologues display differential cellular binding: EhaG mediates specific adhesion to colorectal epithelial cells while UpaG promotes specific binding to bladder epithelial cells. The EhaG and UpaG TAAs contain extensive sequence divergence in their respective passenger domains that could account for these differences. Indeed, sequence analyses of UpaG and EhaG homologues from several E. coli genomes revealed grouping of the proteins in clades almost exclusively represented by distinct E. coli pathotypes. The expression of EhaG (in EHEC) and UpaG (in UPEC) was also investigated and shown to be significantly enhanced in an hns isogenic mutant, suggesting that H-NS acts as a negative regulator of both TAAs. Thus, while the EhaG and UpaG TAAs contain some conserved binding and regulatory features, they also possess important differences that correlate with the distinct pathogenic lifestyles of EHEC and UPEC.
三聚体自转运蛋白(TAAs)是许多革兰氏阴性细菌病原体的重要毒力因子。大多数 TAAs 的一个共同特征是能够通过暴露在细胞表面的过客结构域介导对真核细胞或细胞外基质(ECM)蛋白的附着。在这里,我们描述了从肠出血性大肠杆菌(EHEC)O157:H7 中鉴定出的 TAA EhaG 的特征。EhaG 是最近从泌尿道致病性大肠杆菌(UPEC)中鉴定出的 UpaG TAA 的位置同源物。与 UpaG 相似,EhaG 定位于细菌细胞表面,并促进细胞聚集、生物膜形成以及与一系列 ECM 蛋白的附着。然而,这两个同源物显示出不同的细胞结合:EhaG 介导对结直肠上皮细胞的特异性附着,而 UpaG 促进对膀胱上皮细胞的特异性附着。EhaG 和 UpaG TAAs 在其各自的过客结构域中存在广泛的序列差异,这可能解释了这些差异。事实上,对来自几种大肠杆菌基因组的 UpaG 和 EhaG 同源物的序列分析表明,这些蛋白质在类群中分组几乎完全由不同的大肠杆菌血清型代表。还研究了 EHEC 中 EhaG(在 EHEC 中)和 UPEC 中 UpaG(在 UPEC 中)的表达情况,并表明在 hns 同基因突变体中表达显著增强,这表明 H-NS 作为这两个 TAA 的负调节剂。因此,虽然 EhaG 和 UpaG TAAs 包含一些保守的结合和调节特征,但它们也具有重要的差异,这些差异与 EHEC 和 UPEC 不同的致病生活方式相关。