• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考察不同解释水平的惩罚。

Examining punishment at different explanatory levels.

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Feb;35(1):23-4. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1100121X.

DOI:10.1017/S0140525X1100121X
PMID:22289312
Abstract

Experimental studies on punishment have sometimes been over-interpreted not only for the reasons Guala lists, but also because of a frequent conflation of proximate and ultimate explanatory levels that Guala's review perpetuates. Moreover, for future analyses we may need a clearer classification of different kinds of punishment.

摘要

惩罚的实验研究有时不仅因为瓜拉列出的原因而被过度解释,而且还因为瓜拉的综述经常混淆近因和终极解释层次。此外,对于未来的分析,我们可能需要对不同类型的惩罚进行更清晰的分类。

相似文献

1
Examining punishment at different explanatory levels.考察不同解释水平的惩罚。
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Feb;35(1):23-4. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1100121X.
2
Proximate and ultimate causes of punishment and strong reciprocity.惩罚和强互惠的近因和远因。
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Feb;35(1):16-7. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11001154.
3
Altruistic punishment as an explanation of hunter-gatherer cooperation: how much has experimental economics achieved?利他性惩罚作为对狩猎采集者合作的解释:实验经济学取得了多大成就?
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Feb;35(1):40. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11000902.
4
Perspectives from ethnography on weak and strong reciprocity.从民族志视角看弱互惠和强互惠。
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Feb;35(1):44-5. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11000860.
5
What we need is theory of human cooperation (and meta-analysis) to bridge the gap between the lab and the wild.我们需要人类合作理论(和荟萃分析)来弥合实验室和野外之间的差距。
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Feb;35(1):41-2. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11000872.
6
Importing social preferences across contexts and the pitfall of over-generalization across theories.跨情境导入社会偏好与理论间过度泛化的陷阱。
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Feb;35(1):34-5. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11001294.
7
In medio stat virtus: theoretical and methodological extremes regarding reciprocity will not explain complex social behaviors.中庸之道:互惠的理论和方法极端情况无法解释复杂的社会行为。
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Feb;35(1):22-3. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11001208.
8
Experiments combining communication with punishment options demonstrate how individuals can overcome social dilemmas.实验将沟通与惩罚选项相结合,展示了个体如何克服社会困境。
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Feb;35(1):33-4. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11001282.
9
Retaliation and antisocial punishment are overlooked in many theoretical models as well as behavioral experiments.在许多理论模型和行为实验中,报复和反社会惩罚都被忽视了。
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Feb;35(1):24. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11001221.
10
Punishing for your own good: the case of reputation-based cooperation.为了自身利益而惩罚:基于声誉的合作案例。
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Feb;35(1):40-1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11001336.