Rahman A M, Bari A
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka.
J Diarrhoeal Dis Res. 1990 Mar-Jun;8(1-2):18-23.
Feasibility of home treatment of diarrhoea with packaged rice-based oral rehydration salts (R-ORS) was compared, in terms of cost, with that for glucose-based oral rehydration salts (G-ORS). Packets of G-ORS (World Health Organization-recommended composition) were distributed in two Bangladeshi villages (G-ORS area). Packets of R-ORS with similar composition, except that glucose was replaced with rice flour (50 g/l), were distributed in other two villages (R-ORS area). During the 7-month study period, 1061 and 1348 diarrhoeal episodes were detected among 409 under-five children in each of the study areas. R-ORS was used, either alone or in combination with drugs, to treat 662 (62%) episodes in the R-ORS area, compared to 1101 (82%) episodes in the G-ORS area. The treatment cost per episode was more with R-ORS than with G-ORS, though fewer R-ORS packets were used per episode. Among others, the main factor for the higher cost was found to be the higher production cost of R-ORS packets. Expected early recovery from diarrhoea with use of R-ORS was not observed in this study. Under the study situation, the feasibility of home treatment of diarrhoea with packaged R-ORS was not apparent.
将基于大米的口服补液盐(R-ORS)用于腹泻家庭治疗的可行性,在成本方面与基于葡萄糖的口服补液盐(G-ORS)进行了比较。将G-ORS包(世界卫生组织推荐的成分)分发给孟加拉国的两个村庄(G-ORS地区)。将成分相似但葡萄糖被米粉(50克/升)替代的R-ORS包分发给另外两个村庄(R-ORS地区)。在为期7个月的研究期间,每个研究地区的409名五岁以下儿童中分别检测到1061例和1348例腹泻发作。在R-ORS地区,单独或与药物联合使用R-ORS治疗了662例(62%)腹泻发作,而在G-ORS地区这一数字为1101例(82%)。尽管每例腹泻发作使用的R-ORS包较少,但R-ORS的每次治疗成本高于G-ORS。其中,成本较高的主要因素是R-ORS包的生产成本较高。本研究未观察到使用R-ORS腹泻有望早期恢复的情况。在本研究情况下,用包装好的R-ORS进行腹泻家庭治疗的可行性并不明显。