Suppr超能文献

儿童边缘型人格特征量表的临床临界分数,用于区分边缘型人格障碍青少年、其他精神病理学情况青少年和无精神病理学情况青少年:一项重复研究

Clinical cut-off scores for the Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children to differentiate among adolescents with Borderline Personality Disorder, other psychopathology, and no psychopathology: a replication study.

作者信息

Gecha Tess, McLaren Veronica, Sharp Carla

机构信息

University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Middlesex Health, Middletown, CT, USA.

出版信息

Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2024 Aug 26;11(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40479-024-00264-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite being one of the most popular measures of borderline pathology in adolescents, only one study has evaluated clinical cut-off scores for the Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children (BPFS-C) using a small sample without a healthy comparison group (Chang B, Sharp C, Ha C. The Criterion Validity of the Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children in an Adolescent Inpatient Setting. J Personal Disord. 2011;25(4):492-503. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2011.25.4.492 .). The purpose of the current study was to replicate and improve on the limitations of the prior study conducted by Chang et al. to more definitively establish clinical cut-off scores for the self- and parent-report versions of the BPFS-C to detect clinical and sub-clinical borderline personality disorder (BPD) in a large sample of adolescents with BPD, other psychopathology, and no psychopathology.

METHODS

A total of 900 adolescents ranging from ages 12-17 participated in this study. The clinical sample consisted of 622 adolescents recruited from an inpatient psychiatric facility, and the healthy control sample consisted of 278 adolescents recruited from the community. All participants completed the BPFS-C and were administered the Child Interview for DSM-IV Borderline Personality Disorder (CI-BPD).

RESULTS

Using three-way ROC analyses, cut-off scores on the self- and parent-report versions of the BPFS-C distinguishing adolescents with BPD from those with subclinical BPD, and those with subclinical BPD from healthy adolescents were established.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the use of both versions of the BPFS-C to detect adolescents with BPD and sub-clinical BPD.

摘要

背景

尽管儿童边缘型人格特质量表(BPFS-C)是青少年边缘型病理最常用的测量方法之一,但仅有一项研究在未设健康对照组的小样本中评估了该量表的临床临界分数(Chang B, Sharp C, Ha C. 青少年住院患者中儿童边缘型人格特质量表的效标效度. 人格障碍杂志. 2011;25(4):492 - 503. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2011.25.4.492.)。本研究的目的是重复并改进Chang等人之前研究的局限性,以便更明确地确定BPFS-C自评和家长报告版本的临床临界分数,从而在患有边缘型人格障碍(BPD)、其他精神病理学问题和无精神病理学问题的大量青少年样本中检测临床和亚临床边缘型人格障碍。

方法

共有900名年龄在12 - 17岁的青少年参与了本研究。临床样本包括从住院精神科机构招募的622名青少年,健康对照样本包括从社区招募的278名青少年。所有参与者都完成了BPFS-C,并接受了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版边缘型人格障碍儿童访谈(CI-BPD)。

结果

通过三元ROC分析,确定了BPFS-C自评和家长报告版本区分患有BPD的青少年与亚临床BPD青少年以及区分亚临床BPD青少年与健康青少年的临界分数。

结论

这些发现支持使用BPFS-C的两个版本来检测患有BPD和亚临床BPD的青少年。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f463/11346013/62ba90e8ac25/40479_2024_264_Figa_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验