• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理健康服务康复取向的衡量标准:系统评价。

Measures of the recovery orientation of mental health services: systematic review.

机构信息

Section for Recovery, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, Box PO29, SE5 8AF, UK.

出版信息

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Nov;47(11):1827-35. doi: 10.1007/s00127-012-0484-y. Epub 2012 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00127-012-0484-y
PMID:22322983
Abstract

PURPOSE

The review aimed to (1) identify measures that assess the recovery orientation of services; (2) discuss how these measures have conceptualised recovery, and (3) characterise their psychometric properties.

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken using seven sources. The conceptualisation of recovery within each measure was investigated by rating items against a conceptual framework of recovery comprising five recovery processes: connectedness; hope and optimism; identity; meaning and purpose; and empowerment. Psychometric properties of measures were evaluated using quality criteria.

RESULTS

Thirteen recovery orientation measures were identified, of which six met eligibility criteria. No measure was a good fit with the conceptual framework. No measure had undergone extensive psychometric testing and none had data on test-retest reliability or sensitivity to change.

CONCLUSIONS

Many measures have been developed to assess the recovery orientation of services. Comparisons between the measures were hampered by the different conceptualisations of recovery used and by the lack of uniformity on the level of organisation at which services were assessed. This situation makes it a challenge for services and researchers to make an informed choice on which measure to use. Further work is needed to produce measures with a transparent conceptual underpinning and demonstrated psychometric properties.

摘要

目的

本综述旨在:(1) 确定评估服务康复取向的测量工具;(2) 讨论这些测量工具如何对康复进行概念化;(3) 描述其心理测量学特性。

方法

采用七种来源进行系统综述。通过将项目与康复的概念框架进行评分,调查每个测量工具中的康复概念,该框架包括五个康复过程:联系;希望和乐观;身份认同;意义和目的;以及赋权。使用质量标准评估测量工具的心理测量学特性。

结果

确定了 13 种康复取向的测量工具,其中 6 种符合入选标准。没有一种测量工具与概念框架完全匹配。没有一种测量工具经过广泛的心理测量学测试,也没有关于重测信度或对变化的敏感性的数据。

结论

已经开发了许多测量工具来评估服务的康复取向。由于使用的康复概念不同,以及评估服务的组织层面缺乏统一性,对这些工具进行比较受到阻碍。这种情况使得服务提供者和研究人员难以做出明智的选择,决定使用哪种测量工具。需要进一步的工作来制定具有透明概念基础和经过验证的心理测量学特性的测量工具。

相似文献

1
Measures of the recovery orientation of mental health services: systematic review.心理健康服务康复取向的衡量标准:系统评价。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Nov;47(11):1827-35. doi: 10.1007/s00127-012-0484-y. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
4
Parent-training programmes for improving maternal psychosocial health.改善孕产妇心理社会健康的家长培训项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD002020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002020.pub2.
5
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
6
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
7
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
8
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the psychometric properties and validating the Portuguese version of the INSPIRE measure of staff support for personal recovery in Portugal.评估葡萄牙版INSPIRE员工支持个人康复量表的心理测量特性并进行效度验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):636. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07060-3.
2
Critical Analysis of Tools for Measuring Recovery-Oriented Practice in Mental Health Facilities: A Scoping Review.精神卫生机构中以康复为导向的实践测量工具的批判性分析:一项范围综述
Clin Pract. 2024 Oct 31;14(6):2313-2328. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14060181.
3
Implementation of the Recovery Model and Its Outcomes in Patients with Severe Mental Disorder.

本文引用的文献

1
What does recovery mean in practice? A qualitative analysis of international recovery-oriented practice guidance.在实践中,康复意味着什么?对国际康复导向实践指南的定性分析。
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Dec;62(12):1470-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.001312011.
2
Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis.心理健康中个人康复的概念框架:系统评价和叙述性综合。
Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;199(6):445-52. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083733.
3
Multiple perspectives on mental health outcome: needs for care and service satisfaction assessed by staff, patients and family members.
康复模式在重度精神障碍患者中的实施及其效果
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 6;12(9):952. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12090952.
4
Schema therapy versus treatment as usual for outpatients with difficult-to-treat depression: study protocol for a parallel group randomized clinical trial (DEPRE-ST).方案治疗与常规治疗对治疗困难的门诊抑郁症患者的比较:一项平行组随机临床试验(DEPRE-ST)的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Apr 16;25(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08079-9.
5
Psychoeducational interventions for people living with chronic communicable disease: a systematic review.慢性传染病患者的心理教育干预措施:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 23;14(3):e077007. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077007.
6
A systematic review of measures of the personal recovery orientation of mental health services and staff.对精神卫生服务及工作人员个人康复导向测量方法的系统评价。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2023 Oct 17;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13033-023-00600-y.
7
Case managers' reflections of a brief case management intervention in Canada.加拿大案例管理人员对短期案例管理干预的反思。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 28;14:1151904. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1151904. eCollection 2023.
8
Exploring the Lived Experience on Recovery from Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) among Women Survivors and Five CHIME Concepts: A Qualitative Study.探索女性幸存者从重度抑郁症(MDD)康复的生活经历及五个CHIME概念:一项定性研究
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Feb 9;13(2):151. doi: 10.3390/bs13020151.
9
The impacts of implementing recovery innovations: a conceptual framework grounded in qualitative research.实施康复创新的影响:基于定性研究的概念框架。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2022 Oct 9;16(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13033-022-00559-2.
10
Measuring mental health recovery: Cross-cultural adaptation of the 15-item Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery in Spain (QPR-15-SP).测量心理健康康复:西班牙 15 项康复进程问卷(QPR-15-SP)的跨文化调适。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Jun;31(3):650-664. doi: 10.1111/inm.12985. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
心理健康结局的多重视角:工作人员、患者和家属评估的护理需求和服务满意度。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Jul;47(7):1035-45. doi: 10.1007/s00127-011-0418-0. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
4
Service user attachments to psychiatric key workers and teams.服务使用者对精神科关键工作人员和团队的依恋。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 May;47(5):817-25. doi: 10.1007/s00127-011-0388-2. Epub 2011 May 28.
5
One size fits all: or horses for courses? Recovery-based care in specialist mental health services.一刀切还是因材施教?专科精神卫生服务中的基于康复的护理。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;46(2):127-36. doi: 10.1007/s00127-009-0174-6.
6
Assessing the value of existing recovery measures for routine use in Australian mental health services.评估现有康复措施在澳大利亚精神卫生服务中的常规使用价值。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;45(4):267-80. doi: 10.3109/00048674.2010.549996. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
7
Recovery-oriented service provision and clinical outcomes in assertive community treatment.以康复为导向的服务提供与社区强化治疗的临床结局。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2011 Winter;34(3):194-201. doi: 10.2975/34.3.2011.194.201.
8
Measuring recovery in mental health services.衡量心理健康服务中的康复情况。
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2010;47(3):206-12.
9
Mental health consumers' perceptions of receiving recovery-focused services.心理健康服务使用者对接受以康复为重点的服务的看法。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Aug;15(4):654-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01070.x.
10
Effect of feedback of treatment outcome in specialist mental healthcare: meta-analysis.专科精神卫生保健中治疗结果反馈的效果:荟萃分析
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;195(1):15-22. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.053967.