Suppr超能文献

养老院居民中抗精神病药物的比较安全性。

Comparative safety of antipsychotic medications in nursing home residents.

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02120, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Mar;60(3):420-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03853.x. Epub 2012 Feb 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the risk of major medical events in nursing home residents newly initiated on conventional or atypical antipsychotic medications (APMs).

DESIGN

Cohort study, using linked Medicaid, Medicare, Minimum Data Set, and Online Survey Certification and Reporting data. Propensity score-adjusted proportional hazards models were used to compare risks for medical events at a class and individual drug level.

SETTING

Nursing homes in 45 U.S. states.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-three thousand nine hundred fifty-nine Medicaid-eligible residents aged 65 and older who initiated APM treatment after nursing home admission in 2001 to 2005.

MEASUREMENTS

Hospitalization for myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular events, serious bacterial infections, and hip fracture within 180 days of treatment initiation.

RESULTS

Risks of bacterial infections (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05-1.49) and possibly myocardial infarction (HR = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.81-1.86) and hip fracture (HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.95-1.76) were higher, and risks of cerebrovascular events (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.65-1.02) were lower in participants initiating conventional APMs than in those initiating atypical APMs. Little variation existed between individual atypical APMs, except for a somewhat lower risk of cerebrovascular events with olanzapine (HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.81-1.02) and quetiapine (HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.79-1.02) and a lower risk of bacterial infections (HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.73-0.94) and possibly a higher risk of hip fracture (HR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.96-1.43) with quetiapine than with risperidone. Dose-response relationships were observed for all events (HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.05-1.19 for high vs low dose for all events combined).

CONCLUSION

These associations underscore the importance of carefully selecting the specific APM and dose and monitoring their safety, especially in nursing home residents who have an array of medical illnesses and are undergoing complex medication regimens.

摘要

目的

比较新启用传统或非典型抗精神病药物(APM)的养老院居民发生主要医疗事件的风险。

设计

使用链接的医疗补助、医疗保险、最低数据集和在线调查认证和报告数据的队列研究。使用倾向评分调整后的比例风险模型比较了在药物类别和个别药物水平上发生医疗事件的风险。

设置

美国 45 个州的养老院。

参与者

83959 名符合医疗补助条件的 65 岁及以上居民,他们在 2001 年至 2005 年养老院入院后开始使用 APM 治疗。

测量

治疗开始后 180 天内的心肌梗死、脑血管事件、严重细菌感染和髋部骨折住院。

结果

细菌感染的风险(危险比(HR)=1.25,95%置信区间(CI)=1.05-1.49)和可能的心肌梗死(HR=1.23,95%CI=0.81-1.86)和髋部骨折(HR=1.29,95%CI=0.95-1.76)的风险较高,而传统 APM 起始组的脑血管事件风险(HR=0.82,95%CI=0.65-1.02)较低。除了奥氮平和喹硫平的脑血管事件风险略低(HR=0.91,95%CI=0.81-1.02)和喹硫平的细菌感染风险较低(HR=0.83,95%CI=0.73-0.94)以及髋部骨折风险可能较高(HR=1.17,95%CI=0.96-1.43)外,个别非典型 APM 之间几乎没有差异,与利培酮相比。所有事件均观察到剂量反应关系(所有事件的 HR=1.12,95%CI=1.05-1.19,高剂量与低剂量)。

结论

这些关联强调了仔细选择特定的 APM 和剂量并监测其安全性的重要性,尤其是在患有一系列医疗疾病并接受复杂药物治疗方案的养老院居民中。

相似文献

1
Comparative safety of antipsychotic medications in nursing home residents.养老院居民中抗精神病药物的比较安全性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Mar;60(3):420-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03853.x. Epub 2012 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

3
Psychotropic Drug-Associated Pneumonia in Older Adults.老年人与精神药物相关的肺炎。
Drugs Aging. 2020 Apr;37(4):241-261. doi: 10.1007/s40266-020-00754-1.
7
'Big data' in mental health research: current status and emerging possibilities.心理健康研究中的“大数据”:现状与新机遇
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;51(8):1055-72. doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1266-8. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
10
Big data are coming to psychiatry: a general introduction.大数据正在进入精神病学领域:概论。
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2015 Dec;3(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40345-015-0038-9. Epub 2015 Sep 29.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验