Bath-Hextall Fiona J, Jenkinson Claire, Humphreys Rosemary, Williams Hywel C
School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham,
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;2012(2):CD005205. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005205.pub3.
Many people with atopic eczema are reluctant to use the most commonly recommended treatments because they fear the long-term health effects. As a result, many turn to dietary supplements as a possible treatment approach, often with the belief that some essential ingredient is 'missing' in their diet. Various supplements have been proposed, but it is unclear whether any of these interventions are effective.
To evaluate dietary supplements for treating established atopic eczema/dermatitis.Evening primrose oil, borage oil, and probiotics are covered in other Cochrane reviews.
We searched the following databases up to July 2010: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (from 2005), EMBASE (from 2007), PsycINFO (from 1806), AMED (from 1985), LILACS (from 1982), ISI Web of Science, GREAT (Global Resource of EczemA Trials) database, and reference lists of articles. We searched ongoing trials registers up to April 2011.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of dietary supplements for the treatment of those with established atopic eczema/dermatitis.
Two authors independently screened the titles and abstracts, read the full text of the publications, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias.
We included 11 studies with a total of 596 participants. Two studies assessed fish oil versus olive oil or corn oil placebo. The following were all looked at in single studies: oral zinc sulphate compared to placebo, selenium versus selenium plus vitamin E versus placebo, vitamin D versus placebo, vitamin D versus vitamin E versus vitamins D plus vitamin E together versus placebo, pyridoxine versus placebo, sea buckthorn seed oil versus sea buckthorn pulp oil versus placebo, hempseed oil versus placebo, sunflower oil (linoleic acid) versus fish oil versus placebo, and DHA versus control (saturated fatty acids of the same energy value). Two small studies on fish oil suggest a possible modest benefit, but many outcomes were explored. A convincingly positive result from a much larger study with a publicly-registered protocol is needed before clinical practice can be influenced.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no convincing evidence of the benefit of dietary supplements in eczema, and they cannot be recommended for the public or for clinical practice at present. Whilst some may argue that at least supplements do not do any harm, high doses of vitamin D may give rise to serious medical problems, and the cost of long-term supplements may also mount up.
许多特应性皮炎患者不愿使用最常推荐的治疗方法,因为他们担心长期健康影响。因此,许多人转向膳食补充剂作为一种可能的治疗方法,通常认为他们的饮食中“缺少”某些必需成分。已经提出了各种补充剂,但尚不清楚这些干预措施是否有效。
评估膳食补充剂治疗已确诊的特应性皮炎/皮炎的效果。月见草油、琉璃苣油和益生菌在其他Cochrane综述中已有涉及。
我们检索了截至2010年7月的以下数据库:Cochrane皮肤小组专业注册库、Cochrane图书馆中的Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE(自2005年起)、EMBASE(自2007年起)、PsycINFO(自1806年起)、AMED(自1985年起)、LILACS(自1982年起)、ISI科学网、GREAT(全球湿疹试验资源)数据库以及文章的参考文献列表。我们检索了截至2011年4月的正在进行的试验注册库。
膳食补充剂治疗已确诊的特应性皮炎患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。
两位作者独立筛选标题和摘要,阅读出版物全文,提取数据并评估偏倚风险。
我们纳入了11项研究,共596名参与者。两项研究评估了鱼油与橄榄油或玉米油安慰剂的对比。以下均在单项研究中进行了观察:口服硫酸锌与安慰剂对比、硒与硒加维生素E与安慰剂对比、维生素D与安慰剂对比、维生素D与维生素E与维生素D加维生素E联合与安慰剂对比、吡哆醇与安慰剂对比、沙棘籽油与沙棘果肉油与安慰剂对比、大麻籽油与安慰剂对比、向日葵油(亚油酸)与鱼油与安慰剂对比,以及DHA与对照(相同能量值的饱和脂肪酸)对比。两项关于鱼油的小型研究表明可能有适度益处,但探索了许多结局。在影响临床实践之前,需要一项有公开注册方案的更大规模研究得出令人信服的阳性结果。
没有令人信服的证据表明膳食补充剂对湿疹有益,目前不能向公众或临床实践推荐。虽然有些人可能认为至少补充剂无害,但高剂量的维生素D可能会引发严重的医学问题,而且长期补充剂的费用也可能会增加。