• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与癌症随机临床试验的障碍:文献系统综述

Obstacles to participation in randomised cancer clinical trials: a systematic review of the literature.

作者信息

Grand Melissa M, O'Brien Peter C

机构信息

TROG Cancer Research, Calvary Mater Newcastle Calvary Mater Newcastle University of Newcastle, HRMC, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2012 Feb;56(1):31-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2011.02337.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1754-9485.2011.02337.x
PMID:22339743
Abstract

Accrual to clinical trials continues to be a problem in many countries including Australia despite its fundamental importance to the progress of evidence-based medicine. This paper reviews the current literature addressing the obstacles to accrual excluding those related to protocol design. An electronic search of the literature identified publications in oncology specifically addressing the obstacles to participation in clinical trials. This search was supplemented by searches of key oncology journals. Obstacles fall into three main categories - clinician, patient and system; however, there are overlaps between categories. Clinician behaviour is the most important of these. Exclusion of patients for reasons other than defined eligibility criteria, concerns about increased time requirements, and suboptimal communication with patients all affect accrual. Risk management strategies for clinical trials need to be individualised to address the obstacles most likely to negatively impact on accrual. Communication between clinician and patient appears to be a greater issue than previously recognised. Time concerns need to be addressed as generational change affects the expectations of the medical workforce.

摘要

尽管临床试验入组对循证医学的发展至关重要,但在包括澳大利亚在内的许多国家,临床试验入组仍然是一个问题。本文综述了当前关于入组障碍的文献,不包括与方案设计相关的障碍。通过电子检索文献,确定了肿瘤学领域专门论述参与临床试验障碍的出版物。通过检索主要肿瘤学期刊对这一检索进行了补充。障碍主要分为三类——临床医生、患者和系统;然而,各类别之间存在重叠。其中临床医生的行为最为重要。因既定合格标准以外的原因排除患者、对时间要求增加的担忧以及与患者沟通欠佳都会影响入组。临床试验的风险管理策略需要个性化,以解决最有可能对入组产生负面影响的障碍。临床医生与患者之间的沟通似乎是一个比以往认识到的更大的问题。由于代际变化影响医疗劳动力的期望,需要解决对时间的担忧。

相似文献

1
Obstacles to participation in randomised cancer clinical trials: a systematic review of the literature.参与癌症随机临床试验的障碍:文献系统综述
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2012 Feb;56(1):31-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2011.02337.x.
2
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about entering screening programs.个性化风险沟通,以便就参与筛查项目做出明智决策。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(1):CD001865. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001865.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
7
Interventions for infantile haemangiomas of the skin.皮肤婴儿血管瘤的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD006545. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006545.pub3.
8
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
9
Population-based interventions for reducing sexually transmitted infections, including HIV infection.基于人群的减少性传播感染(包括艾滋病毒感染)的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD001220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001220.pub2.
10
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients.改善医院住院患者抗生素处方行为的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 9;2(2):CD003543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Why do patients take part in research? An updated overview of systematic reviews of psychosocial barriers and facilitators.患者为何参与研究?心理社会障碍与促进因素的系统评价最新综述。
Trials. 2025 May 27;26(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08850-6.
2
Knowledge and understanding of information after taking decision to participate or not in a randomized trial of surgery vs radiotherapy among patients with locally advanced prostate cancer - an observational study.在决定是否参与局部晚期前列腺癌患者手术与放疗随机试验后对信息的知晓与理解——一项观察性研究。
Acta Oncol. 2025 Jan 28;64:167-172. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42218.
3
Community Engagement Strategies for Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Populations.
针对代表性不足的种族和族裔群体的社区参与策略
Mayo Clin Proc. 2024 Jan;99(1):159-171. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.07.015.
4
Barriers and facilitators to the participation of subjects in clinical trials: An overview of reviews.受试者参与临床试验的障碍与促进因素:综述概述
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Aug 3;23:100829. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100829. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
Overcoming Barriers to Clinical Trial Participation: Outcomes of a National Clinical Trial Matching and Navigation Service for Patients With a Blood Cancer.克服临床试验参与障碍:为血液癌症患者提供全国临床试验匹配和导航服务的结果。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Dec;17(12):e1866-e1878. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.01068. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
6
Deciding to Enrol in a Cancer Trial: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.决定参加癌症试验:定性研究的系统评价
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Oct 27;13:1257-1281. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S266281. eCollection 2020.
7
Feasibility of the PalliSupport care pathway: results from a mixed-method study in acutely hospitalized older patients at the end of life.姑息支持护理路径的可行性:一项针对急性住院临终老年患者的混合方法研究结果
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Sep 15;6:129. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00676-0. eCollection 2020.
8
Why do patients take part in research? An overview of systematic reviews of psychosocial barriers and facilitators.患者为什么参与研究?对心理社会障碍和促进因素的系统评价综述
Trials. 2020 Mar 12;21(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4197-3.
9
What is the effect of self-identified HIV activism in willingness to participate in HIV cure-related clinical trials? Results from the ANRS-APSEC study.自我认定的艾滋病病毒维权行动对参与艾滋病病毒治愈相关临床试验的意愿有何影响?法国国家艾滋病研究机构-艾滋病预防与研究协会(ANRS-APSEC)研究的结果。
J Virus Erad. 2019 Sep 18;5(3):152-162. doi: 10.1016/S2055-6640(20)30045-5.
10
Patient perceptions concerning clinical trials in oncology patients.肿瘤患者对临床试验的看法。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Sep 21;4:179-185. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.09.005. eCollection 2016 Dec 15.