• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国神经病学家关于脑死亡的调查:脑死亡的概念基础和诊断测试的理解。

A survey of American neurologists about brain death: understanding the conceptual basis and diagnostic tests for brain death.

机构信息

Stollery Children's Hospital and University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Intensive Care. 2012 Feb 17;2(1):4. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-2-4.

DOI:10.1186/2110-5820-2-4
PMID:22339807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3310851/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neurologists often diagnose brain death (BD) and explain BD to families in the intensive care unit. This study was designed to determine whether neurologists agree with the standard concept of death (irreversible loss of integrative unity of the organism) and understand the state of the brain when BD is diagnosed.

METHODS

A previously validated survey was mailed to a random sample of 500 board-certified neurologists in the United States. Main outcomes were: responses indicating the concept of death that BD fulfills and the empirical state of the brain that would rule out BD.

RESULTS

After the second mailing, 218 (44%) surveys were returned. Few (n = 52, 27%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 21%, 34%) responded that BD is death because the organism has lost integrative unity. The most common justification was a higher brain concept (n = 93, 48%; 95% CI, 41%, 55%), suggesting that irreversible loss of consciousness is death. Contrary to the recent President's Council on Bioethics, few (n = 22, 12%; 95% CI, 8%, 17%) responded that the irreversible lack of vital work of an organism is a concept of death that the BD criterion may satisfy. Many responded that certain brain functions remaining are not compatible with a diagnosis of BD, including EEG activity, evoked potential activity, and hypothalamic neuroendocrine function. Many also responded that brain blood flow and lack of brainstem destruction are not compatible with a diagnosis of BD.

CONCLUSIONS

American neurologists do not have a consistent rationale for accepting BD as death, nor a clear understanding of diagnostic tests for BD.

摘要

背景

神经科医生经常在重症监护病房诊断脑死亡(BD)并向家属解释 BD。本研究旨在确定神经科医生是否同意标准的死亡概念(生物体整合统一性的不可逆转丧失),并了解诊断 BD 时大脑的状态。

方法

我们向美国随机抽取的 500 名已获得委员会认证的神经科医生邮寄了一份先前经过验证的调查问卷。主要结果是:表示 BD 符合死亡概念的答复,以及排除 BD 的大脑实际状态。

结果

第二次邮寄后,有 218 份(44%)调查问卷返回。很少有(n = 52,27%;95%置信区间(CI),21%,34%)认为 BD 是死亡,因为生物体已经失去了整合统一性。最常见的理由是高级大脑概念(n = 93,48%;95% CI,41%,55%),这表明意识的不可逆转丧失就是死亡。与最近的总统生物伦理委员会相反,很少有(n = 22,12%;95% CI,8%,17%)认为生物体不可逆转缺乏重要功能是 BD 标准可能满足的死亡概念。许多人认为,某些大脑功能的保留与 BD 的诊断不兼容,包括脑电图活动、诱发电位活动和下丘脑神经内分泌功能。许多人还认为,脑血流和脑干破坏的缺乏与 BD 的诊断不兼容。

结论

美国神经科医生对接受 BD 作为死亡的依据没有一致的理由,也没有明确了解 BD 的诊断测试。

相似文献

1
A survey of American neurologists about brain death: understanding the conceptual basis and diagnostic tests for brain death.美国神经病学家关于脑死亡的调查:脑死亡的概念基础和诊断测试的理解。
Ann Intensive Care. 2012 Feb 17;2(1):4. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-2-4.
2
A survey to determine the understanding of the conceptual basis and diagnostic tests used for brain death by neurosurgeons in Canada.
Neurosurgery. 2007 Nov;61(5):1039-45; discussion 1046-7. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000303200.84994.ae.
3
Brain death: understanding of the conceptual basis by pediatric intensivists in Canada.脑死亡:加拿大儿科重症监护医师对概念基础的理解
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Jul;160(7):747-52. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.160.7.747.
4
The Fundamental Concept of Death-Controversies and Clinical Relevance: The UDDA Revision Series.死亡的基本概念——争议与临床关联:UDDA 修订系列。
Neurology. 2024 Mar 26;102(6):e209196. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209196. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
5
Inconsistencies Between the Criterion and Tests for Brain Death.脑死亡判定标准与检测之间的不一致性。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):772-780. doi: 10.1177/0885066618784268. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
6
Brain Death: Diagnosis and Imaging Techniques.脑死亡:诊断与成像技术
Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2018 Oct;39(5):515-529. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
7
The brain and somatic integration: insights into the standard biological rationale for equating "brain death" with death.大脑与躯体整合:对将“脑死亡”等同于死亡的标准生物学原理的见解。
J Med Philos. 2001 Oct;26(5):457-78. doi: 10.1076/jmep.26.5.457.3000.
8
Brain Death as the End of a Human Organism as a Self-moving Whole.脑死亡:作为自主运动整体的人类有机个体的终点
J Med Philos. 2021 Oct 1;46(5):530-560. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhab021.
9
Integrated But Not Whole? Applying an Ontological Account of Human Organismal Unity to the Brain Death Debate.整合而非完整?将人类有机体统一性的本体论解释应用于脑死亡辩论
Bioethics. 2016 Oct;30(8):550-6. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12258. Epub 2016 May 10.
10
A Framework for Revisiting Brain Death: Evaluating Awareness and Attitudes Toward the Neuroscientific and Ethical Debate Around the American Academy of Neurology Brain Death Criteria.重新审视脑死亡的框架:评估对美国神经病学学会脑死亡标准的神经科学和伦理辩论的意识和态度。
J Intensive Care Med. 2021 Oct;36(10):1149-1166. doi: 10.1177/0885066620985827. Epub 2021 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Seeking the Soul.探寻灵魂。
J Mol Neurosci. 2025 Mar 21;75(2):40. doi: 10.1007/s12031-025-02334-7.
2
An Investigation into the Public's Attitude Toward Opting out of Brain Death.公众对选择排除脑死亡标准态度的调查
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Jan 14. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02196-8.
3
Assessing the Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria Determination Process in Korea: Insights from 10-Year Noncompleted Donation Data.评估韩国脑死亡/基于神经学标准判定死亡的判定过程:来自10年未完成捐赠数据的见解
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Feb;42(1):253-260. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02072-5. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
4
Death pluralism: a proposal.死亡多元论:一种建议。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2023 Aug 2;18(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13010-023-00139-3.
5
Challenges to Brain Death in Revising the Uniform Determination of Death Act: The UDDA Revision Series.修订《统一死亡判定法案》中脑死亡面临的挑战:《统一死亡判定法案》修订系列
Neurology. 2023 Jul 4;101(1):30-37. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207334.
6
The Understanding of Human Death by Polish Early Career Pre-Specialist Physicians.波兰早期职业专科医生对人类死亡的理解。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 9;19(24):16573. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416573.
7
Attitudes of Polish Doctors towards Brain Death.波兰医生对脑死亡的态度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 22;19(21):13729. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113729.
8
Healthcare Professionals' Understandings of the Definition and Determination of Death: A Scoping Review.医疗保健专业人员对死亡定义和判定的理解:一项范围综述。
Transplant Direct. 2022 Mar 25;8(4):e1309. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001309. eCollection 2022 Apr.
9
Brain death: a clinical overview.脑死亡:临床概述。
J Intensive Care. 2022 Mar 16;10(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40560-022-00609-4.
10
A scoping review of the perceptions of death in the context of organ donation and transplantation.器官捐献与移植背景下死亡认知的范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Dec 18;22(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00734-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Inventing a new death and making it believable.创造一种新的死亡方式并使其令人信服。
Anthropol Med. 2002 Aug;9(2):97-115. doi: 10.1080/1364847022000029705.
2
Death, brain death, and the limits of science: why the whole-brain concept of death is a flawed public policy.死亡、脑死亡与科学的局限:为何全脑死亡概念是有缺陷的公共政策。
J Law Med Ethics. 2010 Fall;38(3):667-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00520.x.
3
Imminent brain death and brain death are not the same: reply to Verheijde and Rady.即将发生的脑死亡与脑死亡并不相同:对费尔海耶德和拉迪的回应。
Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jan;37(1):174. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2035-x. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
4
The case against confirmatory tests for determining brain death in adults.反对用于确定成人脑死亡的确认性检查。
Neurology. 2010 Jul 6;75(1):77-83. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e62194.
5
Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.基于证据的指南更新:成人脑死亡判定:美国神经病学学会质量标准分委会的报告。
Neurology. 2010 Jun 8;74(23):1911-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e242a8.
6
Continuing the definition of death debate: the report of the president's council on bioethics on controversies in the determination of death.继续定义死亡的辩论:总统生物伦理问题委员会关于死亡判定争议的报告。
Bioethics. 2012 Feb;26(2):101-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01812.x. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
7
Reevaluating the dead donor rule.重新评估死亡捐献者规则。
J Med Philos. 2010 Apr;35(2):154-79. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq009. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
8
Are recent defences of the brain death concept adequate?近期对脑死亡概念的辩护是否充分?
Bioethics. 2010 Feb;24(2):47-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00709.x. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
9
Rethinking the ethics of vital organ donations.重新思考重要器官捐赠的伦理问题。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2008 Nov-Dec;38(6):38-46. doi: 10.1353/hcr.0.0085.
10
Neuropathology of brain death in the modern transplant era.现代移植时代脑死亡的神经病理学
Neurology. 2008 Apr 8;70(15):1234-7. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000289762.50376.b6. Epub 2008 Feb 6.