Suppr超能文献

分离语言和非语言手势处理:来自美国手语的电生理证据。

Dissociating linguistic and non-linguistic gesture processing: electrophysiological evidence from American Sign Language.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA 92868-4280, United States.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 2012 Apr;121(1):12-24. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 17.

Abstract

A fundamental advance in our understanding of human language would come from a detailed account of how non-linguistic and linguistic manual actions are differentiated in real time by language users. To explore this issue, we targeted the N400, an ERP component known to be sensitive to semantic context. Deaf signers saw 120 American Sign Language sentences, each consisting of a "frame" (a sentence without the last word; e.g. BOY SLEEP IN HIS) followed by a "last item" belonging to one of four categories: a high-close-probability sign (a "semantically reasonable" completion to the sentence; e.g. BED), a low-close-probability sign (a real sign that is nonetheless a "semantically odd" completion to the sentence; e.g. LEMON), a pseudo-sign (phonologically legal but non-lexical form), or a non-linguistic grooming gesture (e.g. the performer scratching her face). We found significant N400-like responses in the incongruent and pseudo-sign contexts, while the gestures elicited a large positivity.

摘要

如果能详细说明语言使用者如何实时区分非语言和语言手势,那么我们对人类语言的理解将会取得重大进展。为了探索这个问题,我们以 N400 为研究对象,这是一种已知对语义语境敏感的 ERP 成分。失聪的手语使用者观看了 120 个美国手语句子,每个句子都由一个“框架”(没有最后一个词的句子;例如 BOY SLEEP IN HIS)和一个属于四个类别之一的“最后一项”组成:高概率关闭的词(句子的“语义合理”完成词;例如 BED)、低概率关闭的词(真实的词,但句子的“语义奇怪”完成词;例如 LEMON)、伪词(语音上合法但非词汇形式)或非语言修饰手势(例如表演者抓她的脸)。我们在手语使用者的不和谐和伪词语境中发现了显著的 N400 样反应,而手势则引起了很大的正性反应。

相似文献

1
Dissociating linguistic and non-linguistic gesture processing: electrophysiological evidence from American Sign Language.
Brain Lang. 2012 Apr;121(1):12-24. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
2
Electrophysiological correlates of cross-linguistic semantic integration in hearing signers: N400 and LPC.
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Jul;59:57-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.04.011. Epub 2014 Apr 19.
3
Neural systems supporting linguistic structure, linguistic experience, and symbolic communication in sign language and gesture.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 15;112(37):11684-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510527112. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
4
Age of acquisition effects differ across linguistic domains in sign language: EEG evidence.
Brain Lang. 2020 Jan;200:104708. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104708. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
5
Lexical access in American Sign Language: an ERP investigation of effects of semantics and phonology.
Brain Res. 2012 Aug 15;1468:63-83. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.04.029. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
8
ERP correlates of German Sign Language processing in deaf native signers.
BMC Neurosci. 2014 May 10;15:62. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-15-62.

引用本文的文献

1
Sign and Spoken Language Processing Differences in the Brain: A Brief Review of Recent Research.
Ann Neurosci. 2022 Jan;29(1):62-70. doi: 10.1177/09727531211070538. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
2
Predictive Processing in Sign Languages: A Systematic Review.
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 14;13:805792. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.805792. eCollection 2022.
3
Neurophysiological Correlates of Frequency, Concreteness, and Iconicity in American Sign Language.
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2020;1(2):249-267. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00012. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
4
Handling Sign Language Data: The Impact of Modality.
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 12;10:483. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00483. eCollection 2019.
5
Phonological and semantic priming in American Sign Language: N300 and N400 effects.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2018;33(9):1092-1106. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1446543. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
6
The Processing of Biologically Plausible and Implausible forms in American Sign Language: Evidence for Perceptual Tuning.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(3):361-374. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1100315. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
7
Neural language processing in adolescent first-language learners.
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Oct;24(10):2772-83. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht137. Epub 2013 May 21.

本文引用的文献

1
The processing nature of the n400: evidence from masked priming.
J Cogn Neurosci. 1993 Winter;5(1):34-44. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.1.34.
2
Syntactically based sentence processing classes: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
J Cogn Neurosci. 1991 Spring;3(2):151-65. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.2.151.
4
N400 to semantically anomalous pictures and words.
J Cogn Neurosci. 1992 Winter;4(1):15-22. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1992.4.1.15.
5
Word, pseudoword, and nonword processing: a multitask comparison using event-related brain potentials.
J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Nov;9(6):758-75. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.758.
6
Handshape monitoring: Evaluation of linguistic and perceptual factors in the processing of American Sign Language.
Lang Cogn Process. 2012 Jan 1;27(1):117-141. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2010.549667. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
7
CNS activation and regional connectivity during pantomime observation: no engagement of the mirror neuron system for deaf signers.
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 1;49(1):994-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
8
Brain systems mediating semantic and syntactic processing in deaf native signers: biological invariance and modality specificity.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 26;106(21):8784-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809609106. Epub 2009 May 11.
9
The evolution of language.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Mar;1156:19-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04423.x.
10
Gesture and metaphor comprehension: electrophysiological evidence of cross-modal coordination by audiovisual stimulation.
Brain Cogn. 2009 Jun;70(1):42-52. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.12.005. Epub 2009 Feb 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验