• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大流行后期 H1N1 时行为反应的个体差异。

Individual differences in behavioral reactions to H1N1 during a later stage of the epidemic.

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Bacteriology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Infect Public Health. 2012 Mar;5(1):9-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2011.09.008. Epub 2011 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jiph.2011.09.008
PMID:22341839
Abstract

Previous studies regarding individuals' behavioral reactions to the H1N1 epidemic have been conducted nearly exclusively on the pre-pandemic phase of the epidemic or when the vaccine was not available. The prevalence and correlates of behavioral reactions to the H1N1 epidemic in Turkey were investigated by surveying 1045 respondents. The results indicate that behavioral responses can be divided into three classifications: recommended protective behaviors, avoidance behaviors, and ineffective behaviors. The frequency of recommended behaviors was higher than other behaviors, and respondents perceived these behaviors to be more effective. Recommended behaviors were predicted by the following factors: age, being female and married, the individual's beliefs in the effectiveness of the behavior, the perception that one's own behavior influences the infection risk, and the personality factors "Activity" and "Impulsive Sensation Seeking." Avoidance behaviors were predicted by the following factors: marital status, having small children, beliefs in the effectiveness of the behavior, mistrust of the government's ability to manage the epidemic, State Anxiety, and "Impulsive Sensation Seeking." Ineffective behaviors were predicted by the following factors: lower socio-economic status, marital status, the presence of chronic illness, the perceived effectiveness of the behavior, and State Anxiety. This study demonstrates that different types of behavioral reactions to the epidemic have different contributing factors and that these differences should be taken into account in public health interventions.

摘要

先前关于个体对 H1N1 疫情的行为反应的研究几乎完全是在疫情的大流行前阶段或疫苗不可用的情况下进行的。本研究通过调查 1045 名受访者,调查了土耳其人群对 H1N1 疫情的行为反应的流行情况及其相关因素。结果表明,行为反应可分为三类:推荐的保护行为、回避行为和无效行为。推荐行为的频率高于其他行为,受访者认为这些行为更有效。推荐行为可由以下因素预测:年龄、女性和已婚、对行为有效性的个人信念、认为自己的行为会影响感染风险,以及人格因素“活动”和“冲动寻求感觉”。回避行为可由以下因素预测:婚姻状况、有小孩、对行为有效性的信念、对政府管理疫情能力的不信任、状态焦虑和“冲动寻求感觉”。无效行为可由以下因素预测:社会经济地位较低、婚姻状况、慢性病的存在、对行为有效性的感知,以及状态焦虑。本研究表明,对疫情的不同类型的行为反应有不同的促成因素,在公共卫生干预措施中应考虑这些差异。

相似文献

1
Individual differences in behavioral reactions to H1N1 during a later stage of the epidemic.大流行后期 H1N1 时行为反应的个体差异。
J Infect Public Health. 2012 Mar;5(1):9-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2011.09.008. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
2
Anxiety, worry and cognitive risk estimate in relation to protective behaviors during the 2009 influenza A/H1N1 pandemic in Hong Kong: ten cross-sectional surveys.香港 2009 年甲型 H1N1 流感大流行期间与保护行为相关的焦虑、担忧和认知风险估计:十项横断面调查。
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Mar 27;14:169. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-169.
3
Community psychological and behavioral responses through the first wave of the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic in Hong Kong.社区心理和行为反应在 2009 年香港甲型 H1N1 流感大流行的第一波中。
J Infect Dis. 2010 Sep 15;202(6):867-76. doi: 10.1086/655811.
4
Public risk perceptions and preventive behaviors during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic.2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行期间的公众风险认知与预防行为。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2015 Apr;9(2):145-54. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2014.87.
5
Why were Turks unwilling to accept the A/H1N1 influenza-pandemic vaccination? People's beliefs and perceptions about the swine flu outbreak and vaccine in the later stage of the epidemic.为什么土耳其人不愿意接受 A/H1N1 流感大流行疫苗接种?人们对猪流感爆发和疫苗的信仰和看法在疫情后期。
Vaccine. 2010 Dec 16;29(2):329-33. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.10.030. Epub 2010 Oct 24.
6
Attitudes and behaviors of international air travelers toward pandemic influenza.国际航空旅客对大流行性流感的态度和行为。
J Travel Med. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):203-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2011.00500.x.
7
Prevalence and associated psychosocial factors of increased hand hygiene practice during the influenza A/H1N1 pandemic: findings and prevention implications from a national survey in Taiwan.甲型 H1N1 流感大流行期间增加手部卫生实践的流行情况及相关社会心理因素:来自台湾全国性调查的结果和预防意义。
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 May;17(5):604-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.02966.x. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
8
An evaluation of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of employees of a university hospital in an H1N1 influenza pandemic.对一所大学医院员工在甲型H1N1流感大流行期间的知识、态度和行为的评估。
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2014 May 14;8(5):561-9. doi: 10.3855/jidc.3400.
9
[Personal protective and healthcare seeking behaviors urban residents before and during an influenza pandemic in Beijing].[北京流感大流行期间及之前城市居民的个人防护及就医行为]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Nov;30(11):1121-4.
10
Avoidance behaviors and negative psychological responses in the general population in the initial stage of the H1N1 pandemic in Hong Kong.香港 H1N1 流感大流行初期一般人群的回避行为和负面心理反应。
BMC Infect Dis. 2010 May 28;10:139. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-139.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting digital contact tracing tool adoption during COVID-19 from the perspective of TAM: The role of trust, fear, privacy, anxiety, and social media.从技术接受模型的角度预测COVID-19期间数字接触追踪工具的采用:信任、恐惧、隐私、焦虑和社交媒体的作用。
Digit Health. 2025 May 5;11:20552076251336271. doi: 10.1177/20552076251336271. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Predicting individuals' behaviors during a pandemic: why we might have acted as we did during the COVID-19 pandemic.预测大流行期间个体的行为:为何我们在新冠疫情期间会如此行事。
Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2024 Mar 4;12(4):225-233. doi: 10.5114/cipp/174521. eCollection 2024.
3
The role of personality traits and emotional intelligence in the evaluation of the benefits and costs of social distancing during a pandemic outbreak.
人格特质和情绪智力在评估大流行爆发期间社会隔离的收益和成本中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 14;14(1):24018. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74217-7.
4
Does pre-COVID impulsive behaviour predict adherence to hygiene and social distancing measures in youths following the COVID-19 pandemic onset? Evidence from a South African longitudinal study.新冠疫情前的冲动行为是否能预测新冠疫情爆发后青少年对卫生和社交距离措施的遵守情况?来自南非纵向研究的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 20;23(1):533. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15310-w.
5
Patient-reported factors associated with avoidance of in-person care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from a national survey.与 COVID-19 大流行期间避免当面护理相关的患者报告因素:来自全国性调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 5;17(8):e0272609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272609. eCollection 2022.
6
Exposure Detection Applications Acceptance: The Case of COVID-19.暴露检测应用程序的接受度:以 COVID-19 为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 14;19(12):7307. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127307.
7
Psychological distress among hospital caregivers during and after the first wave of COVID-19: Individual factors involved in the severity of symptoms expression.新冠疫情第一波期间及之后医院护理人员的心理困扰:症状表达严重程度所涉及的个体因素。
Psychiatry Res Commun. 2022 Jun;2(2):100037. doi: 10.1016/j.psycom.2022.100037. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
8
Psychological Distancing Usage Uniquely Predicts Reduced Perceived Stress During the COVID-19 Pandemic.心理距离的运用独特地预测了在新冠疫情期间感知压力的减轻。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 16;13:838507. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.838507. eCollection 2022.
9
Psychological responses of Tunisian general population during COVID-19 pandemic.突尼斯普通民众在 COVID-19 大流行期间的心理反应。
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Oct 4;40:74. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.40.74.26379. eCollection 2021.
10
Developmental antecedents of young adults' solidarity during the Covid-19 pandemic: The role of sympathy, social trust, and peer exclusion from early to late adolescence.年轻人在新冠疫情期间团结精神的发展前因:同理心、社会信任以及青少年晚期对同伴排斥的作用。
Child Dev. 2021 Sep;92(5):e832-e850. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13660. Epub 2021 Aug 31.