• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阅读的并行模型中的“序列”效应。

"Serial" effects in parallel models of reading.

机构信息

Neuroscience and Aphasia Research Unit (NARU), University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 2012 Jun;64(4):267-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.01.002
PMID:22343366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3657192/
Abstract

There is now considerable evidence showing that the time to read a word out loud is influenced by an interaction between orthographic length and lexicality. Given that length effects are interpreted by advocates of dual-route models as evidence of serial processing this would seem to pose a serious challenge to models of single word reading which postulate a common parallel processing mechanism for reading both words and nonwords (Coltheart, Rastle, Perry, Langdon, & Ziegler, 2001; Rastle, Havelka, Wydell, Coltheart, & Besner, 2009). However, an alternative explanation of these data is that visual processes outside the scope of existing parallel models are responsible for generating the word-length related phenomena (Seidenberg & Plaut, 1998). Here we demonstrate that a parallel model of single word reading can account for the differential word-length effects found in the naming latencies of words and nonwords, provided that it includes a mapping from visual to orthographic representations, and that the nature of those orthographic representations are not preconstrained. The model can also simulate other supposedly "serial" effects. The overall findings were consistent with the view that visual processing contributes substantially to the word-length effects in normal reading and provided evidence to support the single-route theory which assumes words and nonwords are processed in parallel by a common mechanism.

摘要

现在有相当多的证据表明,大声朗读一个单词的时间受到正字法长度和词汇性之间相互作用的影响。鉴于双通路模型的支持者将长度效应解释为序列处理的证据,这似乎对单个单词阅读模型构成了严重挑战,这些模型假设阅读单词和非单词都有一个共同的平行处理机制(Coltheart、Rastle、Perry、Langdon 和 Ziegler,2001;Rastle、Havelka、Wydell、Coltheart 和 Besner,2009)。然而,对这些数据的另一种解释是,现有平行模型之外的视觉过程负责产生与单词长度相关的现象(Seidenberg 和 Plaut,1998)。在这里,我们证明,只要一个单词阅读的平行模型包括从视觉到正字法表示的映射,并且这些正字法表示的性质不受预先限制,那么它就可以解释单词和非单词命名潜伏期中发现的不同单词长度效应。该模型还可以模拟其他所谓的“序列”效应。总体发现与视觉处理对正常阅读中单词长度效应有很大贡献的观点一致,并为支持单一路径理论提供了证据,该理论假设单词和非单词通过共同机制并行处理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/5c82760d00e6/gr11b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/fc8cdd9fb8a5/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/4dad85228072/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/72a641879f0c/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/152bb60816e4/gr4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/ce5ca3c020d4/gr4b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/4b24c9e5627d/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/41443d7bc150/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/ec0c102ee968/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/cb1da010a346/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/af0c2c7d3222/gr9a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/ab4fc783c890/gr9b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/936a6b6999f5/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/90a644ffe6d0/gr11a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/5c82760d00e6/gr11b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/fc8cdd9fb8a5/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/4dad85228072/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/72a641879f0c/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/152bb60816e4/gr4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/ce5ca3c020d4/gr4b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/4b24c9e5627d/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/41443d7bc150/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/ec0c102ee968/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/cb1da010a346/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/af0c2c7d3222/gr9a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/ab4fc783c890/gr9b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/936a6b6999f5/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/90a644ffe6d0/gr11a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6405/3657192/5c82760d00e6/gr11b.jpg

相似文献

1
"Serial" effects in parallel models of reading.阅读的并行模型中的“序列”效应。
Cogn Psychol. 2012 Jun;64(4):267-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
2
Regularity effects in word naming: what are they?单词命名中的规律性效应:它们是什么?
Mem Cognit. 2000 Dec;28(8):1269-76. doi: 10.3758/bf03211827.
3
Is the orthographic/phonological onset a single unit in reading aloud?朗读时,正字法/语音音首是否为一个单一的单位?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Feb;36(1):175-94. doi: 10.1037/a0015795.
4
When parallel processing in visual word recognition is not enough: new evidence from naming.当视觉单词识别中的并行处理不足时:来自命名的新证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Jun;10(2):405-14. doi: 10.3758/bf03196499.
5
Cerebral asymmetries in early orthographic and phonological reading processes: evidence from backward masking.早期正字法和语音阅读过程中的大脑不对称性:来自反向掩蔽的证据。
Brain Lang. 2005 Nov;95(2):342-52. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.02.005.
6
Modulation of regularity and lexicality effects in reading aloud.
Mem Cognit. 2004 Dec;32(8):1255-64. doi: 10.3758/bf03206316.
7
Phonological coding during reading.阅读过程中的语音编码。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1534-55. doi: 10.1037/a0037830. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
8
Neighbourhood density effects in reading aloud: new insights from simulations with the DRC model.朗读中的邻里密度效应:基于DRC模型模拟的新见解
Can J Exp Psychol. 2002 Dec;56(4):310-8. doi: 10.1037/h0087407.
9
Naming of short words is (almost) the same as naming of alphanumeric symbols: Evidence from two orthographies.短单词的命名(几乎)与字母数字符号的命名相同:来自两种正字法的证据。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Apr;144:152-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.11.016. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
10
Phonological dyslexia and phonological impairment: an exception to the rule?语音性诵读困难与语音障碍:规则的例外情况?
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(14):2861-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.006. Epub 2006 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
What lies beneath: a comparison of reading aloud in pure alexia and semantic dementia.表象之下:纯失读症与语义性痴呆中大声朗读的比较
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2014;31(5-6):461-81. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2014.882300. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
2
Connectionist neuropsychology: uncovering ultimate causes of acquired dyslexia.连接主义神经心理学:揭示获得性失读症的根本原因。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Dec 9;369(1634):20120398. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0398. Print 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Sequential and parallel letter processing in letter-by-letter dyslexia.逐字阅读障碍中的字母顺序和并行处理。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2002 Sep 1;19(6):535-55. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000040.
2
Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts.典型性、独特性和相关性:对生物和非生物概念的语义属性的分析。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2001 Mar 1;18(2):125-74. doi: 10.1080/02643290125857.
3
Beyond single syllables: large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model.
超越单音节:使用连接主义双过程 (CDP++) 模型进行大规模朗读建模。
Cogn Psychol. 2010 Sep;61(2):106-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 May 26.
4
A dual-route perspective on brain activation in response to visual words: evidence for a length by lexicality interaction in the visual word form area (VWFA).双通路视角下视觉词刺激的大脑激活:视词汇区(VWFA)中长度和词法性交互作用的证据。
Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2649-61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.082. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
5
Visuoperceptual deficits in letter-by-letter reading?逐字阅读中的视觉感知缺陷?
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Jun;47(7):1733-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.014. Epub 2009 Feb 14.
6
The cross-script length effect: further evidence challenging PDP models of reading aloud.跨文字脚本长度效应:对大声朗读的并行分布加工模型提出挑战的进一步证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jan;35(1):238-46. doi: 10.1037/a0014361.
7
Reading normal and degraded words: contribution of the dorsal and ventral visual pathways.阅读正常和退化的单词:背侧和腹侧视觉通路的作用
Neuroimage. 2008 Mar 1;40(1):353-66. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.036. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
8
The English Lexicon Project.英语词汇项目
Behav Res Methods. 2007 Aug;39(3):445-59. doi: 10.3758/bf03193014.
9
Using parallel distributed processing models to simulate phonological dyslexia: the key role of plasticity-related recovery.使用并行分布式处理模型模拟语音性阅读障碍:可塑性相关恢复的关键作用。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jul;19(7):1125-39. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1125.
10
SD-squared: on the association between semantic dementia and surface dyslexia.标准差平方:关于语义性痴呆与表层失读症之间的关联
Psychol Rev. 2007 Apr;114(2):316-39. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.316.