Department of Pulmonary Medicine, CSM Medical University, UP, Lucknow, India.
Ann Thorac Med. 2012 Jan;7(1):26-30. doi: 10.4103/1817-1737.91561.
This study was designed to compare the pattern of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) among obese and nonobese subjects regarding clinical and polysomnographic data obtained for a polysomnographic study.
A cross-sectional retrospective descriptive study was conducted by analyzing polysomnographic data in 112 consecutive patients underwent a sleep study at our sleep laboratory from January 2009 to July 2010. Out of them, 81 were diagnosed to have OSA (apnea-hypopnoea Index ≥5). These patients were classified in two groups with body mass index (BMI) < 27.5 kg/m(2) as nonobese and BMI≥27.5 kg/m(2) as obese. Clinical as well as polysomnographic data were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Patients were also evaluated for other risk factors such as smoking, alcoholism, and use of sedatives. Data were subjected to statistical analysis (χ(2)-test, P value <0.05 considered to be significant). The Fisher Exact test was applied wherever the expected frequency for a variable was ≤5.
Of 81 patients with OSA, 36 (44.4%) were nonobese with a mean BMI of 26.62 ± 2.29 kg/m(2) and 45 (55.6%) were obese with a mean BMI of 35.14 ± 3.74 kg/m(2). Mean AHI per hour was significantly more in the obese than in the nonobese group (50.09 ± 29.49 vs. 24.36 ± 12.17, P<0.001). The use of one or more sedatives was more in nonobese as compared to obese (58.3% vs. 24.4%, P=0.002). The obese group had significantly higher desaturation and arousal index (P<0.001). The minimal oxygen saturation was lower in the obese than the nonobese group (68.5 ± 13.00 vs. 80.3 ± 7.40, P<0.001) and was well below 90% in both groups. Overall, the OSA in nonobese patients was mild-to-moderate as compared to that of the obese and no significant differences were observed between them as regard to age, gender, mean neck circumference, excessive daytime sleepiness, adenoid or tonsillar enlargement, smoking, and remaining polysomnographic parameters.
Obstructive sleep apnea can occur in nonobese persons though with less severity as compared to obese leading to a concept that OSA is not restricted to obese persons only and there is a high demand of its awareness regarding evaluation, diagnosis, and management in such individuals.
本研究旨在比较肥胖和非肥胖患者在临床和多导睡眠图数据方面阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的模式,这些数据是为多导睡眠图研究而获得的。
这是一项回顾性的横断面研究,对 2009 年 1 月至 2010 年 7 月在我们的睡眠实验室进行睡眠研究的 112 例连续患者的多导睡眠图数据进行了分析。其中 81 例被诊断为 OSA(呼吸暂停-低通气指数≥5)。这些患者被分为两组,体重指数(BMI)<27.5kg/m2为非肥胖组,BMI≥27.5kg/m2为肥胖组。评估和比较了两组之间的临床和多导睡眠图数据。还评估了患者的其他危险因素,如吸烟、酗酒和使用镇静剂。数据进行了统计学分析(χ2-检验,P 值<0.05 被认为有显著性差异)。Fisher 精确检验用于变量的预期频率≤5 的情况。
在 81 例 OSA 患者中,36 例(44.4%)为非肥胖者,平均 BMI 为 26.62±2.29kg/m2,45 例(55.6%)为肥胖者,平均 BMI 为 35.14±3.74kg/m2。肥胖组每小时的平均 AHI 明显高于非肥胖组(50.09±29.49 与 24.36±12.17,P<0.001)。与肥胖组相比,非肥胖组使用一种或多种镇静剂的比例更高(58.3%与 24.4%,P=0.002)。肥胖组的脱氧和觉醒指数明显更高(P<0.001)。肥胖组的最低氧饱和度低于非肥胖组(68.5±13.00 与 80.3±7.40,P<0.001),两组均低于 90%。总的来说,与肥胖患者相比,非肥胖患者的 OSA 为轻度至中度,两者之间在年龄、性别、颈围平均值、白天嗜睡、腺样体或扁桃体肿大、吸烟以及其余多导睡眠图参数方面无显著差异。
尽管与肥胖患者相比,非肥胖患者的 OSA 严重程度较轻,但仍可能发生 OSA,这一概念表明 OSA 不仅限于肥胖患者,因此需要提高对此类患者进行评估、诊断和治疗的意识。