包皮环切术、杀微生物剂和疫苗导致的避孕套移位：简要综述及方法学考量
Condom migration resulting from circumcision, microbicides and vaccines: brief review and methodological considerations.
作者信息
Crosby Richard A, Ricks Janelle, Young April
机构信息
College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, 111 Washington Avenue, Lexington, KY 40536-0003, USA.
出版信息
Sex Health. 2012 Mar;9(1):96-102. doi: 10.1071/SH11091.
OBJECTIVE
To provide an updated review of condom migration as a means of highlighting methodological issues for future studies of this behavioural issue.
METHODS
Electronic searches of PubMed, MEDLINE and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases were carried out in October 2010 and updated in January 2011 for English-language articles published from 1994 onward.
RESULTS
Evidence addressing condom migration from microbicides and vaccines is vastly underdeveloped, simply because these products are still experimental. In contrast, the more advanced evidence regarding male circumcision is hopeful because it suggests that migration may not be an overwhelming issue. Nonetheless, the entire body of empirical evidence on this question could be substantially expanded and improved.
CONCLUSION
Until stronger evidence suggests that condom migration is unlikely, it is important to be mindful of the potential for condom migration to occur in response to biomedical interventions (circumcision, microbicides and vaccines).
目的
对避孕套移位进行更新综述，以此强调该行为问题未来研究中的方法学问题。
方法
2010年10月对PubMed、MEDLINE及护理与健康相关文献累积索引数据库（CINAHL）进行电子检索，并于2011年1月更新，检索1994年以后发表的英文文章。
结果
关于杀微生物剂和疫苗导致避孕套移位的证据极为匮乏，原因很简单，这些产品仍处于试验阶段。相比之下，关于男性包皮环切术的更先进证据则带来了希望，因为这表明移位可能并非一个压倒性的问题。尽管如此，关于这个问题的整个实证证据体系仍可大幅扩充和完善。
结论
在有更有力的证据表明避孕套移位不太可能发生之前，重要的是要注意到避孕套因生物医学干预（包皮环切术、杀微生物剂和疫苗）而发生移位的可能性。
Zotero 插件